Genetic Mutations vs Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) in Autism

 

Genes make proteins and you need the right amount in the right place

at the right time.

I should start this post by confessing to not having carried out genetic testing on Monty, now aged 18 with autism.  When I did mention this to one autism doctor at a conference, I was surprised by her reply:- “ You did not need to.  Now there’s no point doing it”.

I got lucky and treated at least some of Monty’s Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) by approaching the problem from a different direction.

People do often ask me about what diagnostic tests to run and in particular about genetic testing.  In general, people have far too high expectations regarding such tests and assume that there will be definitive answers, leading to effective therapeutic interventions.

I do include an interesting example today where parent power is leading a drive towards an effective therapeutic intervention in one single gene type of autism.  The approach has been to start with the single gene that has the mutation and look downstream at the resulting Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs). The intervention targets one of the DEGs and not the mutated gene itself.

This is a really important lesson.

It can be possible to repurpose existing drugs to treat DEGs quite cheaply.  Many DEGs encode ion channels and there are very many existing drugs that affect ion channels.

Entirely different types of autism may share some of the same DEGs and so benefit from the same interventions.

 

Genetic Testing 

Genetic testing has not proved to be the holy grail in diagnosing and treating autism, but it remains a worthwhile tool at a population level (i.e. maybe not in your specific case).  What matters most of all are Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs), which is something different.

A paper was recently published that looked into commercially available genetic testing.  Its conclusion was similar to my belief that you risk getting a “false negative” from these tests, in other words they falsely conclude that there is no genetic basis for the person’s symptoms of autism. 

 

Brief Report: Evaluating the Diagnostic Yield of Commercial Gene Panels in Autism

Autism is a prevalent neurodevelopmental condition, highly heterogenous in both genotype and phenotype. This communication adds to existing discussion of the heterogeneity of clinical sequencing tests, “gene panels”, marketed for application in autism. We evaluate the clinical utility of available gene panels based on existing genetic evidence. We determine that diagnostic yields of these gene panels range from 0.22% to 10.02% and gene selection for the panels is variable in relevance, here measured as percentage overlap with SFARI Gene and ranging from 15.15% to 100%. We conclude that gene panels marketed for use in autism are currently of limited clinical utility, and that sequencing with greater coverage may be more appropriate.

 

To save time and money, the commercial gene panels only test genes that the company defines as autism genes.  There is no approved list of autism genes. 

You have more than 20,000 genes and very many are implicated directly, or indirectly, in autism and its comorbities. To be thorough you need Whole Exome Sequencing (WES), where you check them all.  

There are tiny mutations called SNPs ("snips") which you inherit from your parents; there are more than 300 million known SNPs and most people will carry 4-5 million.  Some SNPs are important but clearly most are not.  Some SNPs are very common and some are very rare. 

Even WES only analyses 2% of your DNA, it does not consider the other 98% which is beyond the exome.  Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) which looks at 100% of your DNA will be the ideal solution, but at some time in the future.  The interpretation of WES data is often very poor and adding all the extra data from WGS is going to overwhelm most people involved. 

Today we return to the previous theme of treating autism by treating the downstream effects caused by Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGS).

Genetics is very complicated and so people assume that is must be able to provide answers. For a minority of autism current genetics does indeed provide an answer, but for most people it does not.

Early on in this blog I noted so many overlaps between the genes and signaling pathways that drive cancer and autism, that is was clear that to understand autism you probably first have to understand cancer; and who has time to do that!

Some people’s cancer is predictable. Chris Evert, the American former world No. 1 tennis player, announced that she has ovarian cancer.  Her sister had exactly the same cancer.  Examining family history can often yield useful information and it is a lot less expensive that genetic testing.  Most people’s cancer is not so predictable; sure if you expose yourself to known environmental triggers you raise its chances, but much appears to be random.  Cancer, like much autism, is usually a multiple hit process. Multiple events need to occur and you may only need to block one of them to avoid cancer. We saw this with a genetic childhood leukemia that you can prevent with a gut bacteria. 

Learning about Autism from the 3 Steps to Childhood Leukaemia

What is not random in cancer are the Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs).

We all carry highly beneficial tumor suppressing genes, like the autism/cancer gene PTEN.  You would not want to have a mutation in one of these genes.

What happens in many cancers is that the individual carries two good copies of the gene like PTEN, but the gene is turned off. For example, in many people with prostate cancer, the tumor suppressor gene PTEN is turned off in that specific part of the body.  There is no genetic mutation, but there is a harmful Differentially Expressed Gene (DEG). If you could promptly turn PTEN expression back on, you would suppress the cancer.

Not surprisingly, daily use of drugs that increase PTEN expression is associated with reduced incidence of PTEN associated cancer.  Atorvastatin is one such drug.

 

DEGs are what matter, not simply mutations

 

In many cases genetic mutations are of no clinical relevance, we all carry several on average.  In some cases they are of immediate critical relevance.  In most cases mutations are associated with a chance of something happening, there is no certainty and quite often further hits/events/triggers are required.

A good example is epilepsy. Epilepsy is usually caused by an ion channel dysfunction (sodium, potassium or calcium) that is caused by a defect in the associated gene. Most people are not born with epilepsy, the onset can be many years later.  Some parents of a child with autism/epilepsy carry the same ion channel mutation but remain unaffected. 

 

Follow the DEGs from a known mutation 

There is a vanishingly small amount of intelligent translation of autism science to therapy, or even attempts to do so.  I set out below an example of what can be done.

 

Pitt Hopkins (Haploinsufficiency of TCF4) 

The syndrome is caused by a reduction in Transcription factor 4, due to mutation in the TCF4 gene.  One recently proposed therapy is to repurpose the cheap calcium channel blocker Nicardipine. Follow the rationale below.

 

↓  means down regulated

↑ means up regulated

1.     Gene/Protein TCF4 (Transcription Factor 4) ↓↓↓↓

2.     Genes SCN10a  ↑↑    KCNQ1 ↑↑

3.     Encoding ion channels  Na_v1.8   ↑↑     K_v7.1   ↑↑

4.     Repurpose approved drugs as inhibitors of K_v7.1 and Na_v1.8 

5.     High throughput screen (HTS) of 1280 approved drugs.

6.     The HTS delivered 55 inhibitors of K_v7.1 and 93 inhibitors of Na_v1.8

7.     Repurposing the Calcium Channel Inhibitor Nicardipine as a Na_v1.8 inhibitor 

           

The supporting science: 

Psychiatric Risk Gene Transcription Factor 4 Regulates Intrinsic Excitability of Prefrontal Neurons via Repression of SCN10a and KCNQ1

  

Highlights

•TCF4 loss of function alters the intrinsic excitability of prefrontal neurons 

•TCF4-dependent excitability deficits are rescued by SCN10a and KCNQ1 antagonists 

•TCF4 represses the expression of SCN10a and KCNQ1 ion channels in central neurons 

•SCN10a is a potential therapeutic target for Pitt-Hopkins syndrome

  

Na_v1.8 is a sodium ion channel subtype that in humans is encoded by the SCN10A gene

K_v7.1 (KvLQT1) is a potassium channel protein whose primary subunit in humans is encoded by the KCNQ1 gene.

  

Transcription Factor 4 (TCF4) is a clinically pleiotropic gene associated with schizophrenia and Pitt-Hopkins syndrome (PTHS).  

SNPs in a genomic locus containing TCF4 were among the first to reach genome-wide significance in clinical genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for schizophrenia  These neuropsychiatric disorders are each characterized by prominent cognitive deficits, which suggest not only genetic overlap between these disorders but a potentially overlapping pathophysiology.

We propose that these intrinsic excitability phenotypes may underlie some aspects of pathophysiology observed in PTHS and schizophrenia and identify potential ion channel therapeutic targets.

Given that TCF4 dominant-negative or haploinsufficiency results in PTHS, a syndrome with much more profound neurodevelopmental deficits than those observed in schizophrenia, the mechanism of schizophrenia risk associated with TCF4 is presumably due to less extreme alterations in TCF4 expression at some unknown time point in development

The pathological expression of these peripheral ion channels in the CNS may create a unique opportunity to target these channels with therapeutic agents without producing unwanted off-target effects on normal neuronal physiology, and we speculate that targeting these ion channels may ameliorate cognitive deficits observed in PTHS and potentially schizophrenia.

 

 

Disordered breathing in a Pitt-Hopkins syndrome model involves Phox2b-expressing parafacial neurons and aberrant Nav1.8 expression

Pitt-Hopkins syndrome (PTHS) is a rare autism spectrum-like disorder characterized by intellectual disability, developmental delays, and breathing problems involving episodes of hyperventilation followed by apnea. PTHS is caused by functional haploinsufficiency of the gene encoding transcription factor 4 (Tcf4). Despite the severity of this disease, mechanisms contributing to PTHS behavioral abnormalities are not well understood. Here, we show that a Tcf4 truncation (Tcf4^tr/+) mouse model of PTHS exhibits breathing problems similar to PTHS patients. This behavioral deficit is associated with selective loss of putative expiratory parafacial neurons and compromised function of neurons in the retrotrapezoid nucleus that regulate breathing in response to tissue CO₂/H⁺. We also show that central Nav1.8 channels can be targeted pharmacologically to improve respiratory function at the cellular and behavioral levels in Tcf4^tr/+ mice, thus establishing Nav1.8 as a high priority target with therapeutic potential in PTHS. 

 

Repurposing Approved Drugs as Inhibitors of K_v7.1 and Na_v1.8 To Treat Pitt Hopkins Syndrome

Purpose:

Pitt Hopkins Syndrome (PTHS) is a rare genetic disorder caused by mutations of a specific gene, transcription factor 4 (TCF4), located on chromosome 18. PTHS results in individuals that have moderate to severe intellectual disability, with most exhibiting psychomotor delay. PTHS also exhibits features of autistic spectrum disorders, which are characterized by the impaired ability to communicate and socialize. PTHS is comorbid with a higher prevalence of epileptic seizures which can be present from birth or which commonly develop in childhood. Attenuated or absent TCF4 expression results in increased translation of peripheral ion channels K_v7.1 and Na_v1.8 which triggers an increase in after-hyperpolarization and altered firing properties.

Methods:

We now describe a high throughput screen (HTS) of 1280 approved drugs and machine learning models developed from this data. The ion channels were expressed in either CHO (K_V7.1) or HEK293 (Na_v1.8) cells and the HTS used either ⁸⁶Rb⁺ efflux (K_V7.1) or a FLIPR assay (Na_v1.8).

Results:

The HTS delivered 55 inhibitors of K_v7.1 (4.2% hit rate) and 93 inhibitors of Na_v1.8 (7.2% hit rate) at a screening concentration of 10 μM. These datasets also enabled us to generate and validate Bayesian machine learning models for these ion channels. We also describe a structure activity relationship for several dihydropyridine compounds as inhibitors of Na_v1.8.

Conclusions:

This work could lead to the potential repurposing of nicardipine or other dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists as potential treatments for PTHS acting via Na_v1.8, as there are currently no approved treatments for this rare disorder.

  

Repurposing the Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Inhibitor Nicardipine as a Na_v1.8 inhibitor in vivo for Pitt Hopkins Syndrome

Individuals with the rare genetic disorder Pitt Hopkins Syndrome (PTHS) do not have sufficient expression of the transcription factor 4 (TCF4) which is located on chromosome 18. TCF4 is a basic helix-loop-helix E protein that is critical for the normal development of the nervous system and the brain in humans. PTHS patients lacking sufficient TCF4 frequently display gastrointestinal issues, intellectual disability and breathing problems. PTHS patients also commonly do not speak and display distinctive facial features and seizures. Recent research has proposed that decreased TCF4 expression can lead to the increased translation of the sodium channel Na_v1.8. This in turn results in increased after-hyperpolarization as well as altered firing properties. We have recently identified an FDA approved dihydropyridine calcium antagonist nicardipine used to treat angina, which inhibited Na_v1.8 through a drug repurposing screen.

 

All of the above was a parent driven process.  Well done, Audrey!

Questions remain.

Is Nicardipine actually beneficial to people with Pitt Hopkins Syndrome? Does it matter at what age therapy is started? What about the K_v7.1 inhibitor?

 

Conclusion 

Genetics is complicated, ion channel dysfunctions are complicated; but just a superficial understanding can take you a long way to understand autism, epilepsy and many other health issues.

There is a great deal in this blog about channelopathies/ion channel dysfunctions.

https://epiphanyasd.blogspot.com/search/label/Channelopathy

Almost everyone with autism has one or more channelopathies. Most channelopathies are potentially treatable.

Parents of children with rare single gene autisms should get organized and make sure there is basic research into their specific biological condition.  They need to ensure that there is an animal model created and it is then used to screen for existing drugs that may be therapeutic.  I think they also need to advocate for gene therapy to be developed.  This all takes years, but the sooner you start, the sooner you will make an impact.

Very likely, therapies developed for some single gene autisms will be applicable more broadly.  A good example may be the IGF-1 derivative Trofinetide, for girls with Rett Syndrome. IGF-1 (Insulin-like growth factor 1) is an important growth factor that is required for proper brain development. In the brain, IGF-1 is broken down into a protein fragment called glypromate (GPE). Trofinetide is an orally available version of GPE.

The MeCP2 protein controls the expression of several genes, such as Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF1), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA).  All three are implicated in broader autism. 

https://rettsyndromenews.com/trofinetide-nnz-2566/

In girls with Rett Syndrome the genetic mutation is in the gene MeCP2, but one of the key DEGs (differentially expressed genes) is the FXYD1; it is over-expressed. IGF-1 supresses the activity of FXYD1 and hopefully so does Trofinetide.  Not so complicated, after all!

Medicine is often driven by the imperative to do no harm.

In otherwise severely impaired people, perhaps the imperative should be to try and do some good.

In medicine, time is of the essence; doctors in the ER can be heard to say "Stat!", from the Latin word for immediately, statim.  

How about some urgency in translating autism science into therapy? But then, what's the hurry? Why rock the boat?

On an individual basis, much is already possible, but you will have to do most of the work yourself - clearly a step too far for most people.

   

 

Wnt, TCF4 and Pre-myelinating Oligodendrocytes

Cartoons in art class - Monty is getting ready for Easter break, but not in the Maldives

Today’s post may sound very complicated and narrow, but it is very relevant to people with the following: - 

·        Pitt Hopkins Syndrome (insufficient expression of the Transcription Factor #4  TCF4 gene)

·        Multiple Sclerosis

·        Some Mental Retardation/Intellectual Disability (MR/ID)

·        Schizophrenia

·        Impaired Wnt signalling

·        Perhaps PAK1 inhibitor responders

I do feel that Multiple Sclerosis could be treated very much better if some effort was made to translate the existing science, freely available to all, into therapy. You could greatly improve many people’s lives just by repurposing cheap existing drugs.

In simple terms, to produce myelin that you need to coat axons in your brain, you need a type of cell called an oligodendrocyte (OL).  You need a lot of these cells and you need them to get busy. They place tiny pieces of white insulation along axons of your brain cells, this produces the so called “white matter”.  These pieces of insulation are needed to make electrical signals flow correctly in your brain.

It has been shown that in some people the oligodendrocyte precursors (OLPs) do not “mature” and instead get stuck as premyelinated oligodendrocytes (pre-OL). That means reduced myelination and loss of white matter.

It is clearly shown in the graphic below: -

Tcf4 is expressed in oligodendrocyte lineage in human developmental white matter and in active areas of MS lesions. (A) Tcf4 is expressed in white matter tracts during myelination of human developmental brain at postnatal age 1 mo, 3.5 mo, and 16 mo, but is not expressed by 7 yr. Tcf4 colocalizes with Olig2 when expressed in the developing human corpus callosum. (B) Tcf4 protein expression is evident in active MS lesions, but it is not seen in normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) or in the core of chronic MS lesions. An illustrative MS case is shown with several lesion types present. NAWM stains with Luxol Fast Blue (LFB) and contains sparse LN3(HLA-DR)-positive inflammatory cells, organized SMI-31 axon fibers, and no Tcf4-positive cells. Chronic plaques have sparse LFB staining and LN3-positive cells, intact axons, but no Tcf4-positive cells. In contrast, Tcf4-positive cells are present in active areas of plaques with abundant LN3-positive cells and intact demyelinated axons. Tcf4 expression in active lesions colocalizes (open arrowheads) with a subset of Olig2 cells.


Don’t worry if you don't follow everything. There is nothing wrong with your white matter.

We come back to Wnt signalling that we covered in depth in older posts. This is a complex signalling pathway implicated in autism, some cancers and other conditions. You can both increase and reduce Wnt signalling, which will affect the transcription of numerous genes.

TCF4 is the Pitt Hopkins gene. We have across this syndrome several times, while it is rare, a milder miss-expression of the gene is actually quite common.  Reduced expression of TCF4 is a common feature of MR/ID very broadly. TCF4 has been found to be over-expressed in schizophrenia.

People with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) have been found to have oligodendrocytes “stuck” as non-myelinating (premyelinated oligodendrocytes, pre-OL). Inhibiting the Wnt pathway might play a role in treatment during periods of acute demyelination, when there is a lack of newly minted myelin-producing oligodendrocytes. The study below does refer to Wnt inhibitors in the pipeline as potential cancer therapies.  It looks to me that safe Wnt inhibitors like the cheap drugs widely used to treat children with parasites (Mebendazole/ Niclosamide) could be repurposed to treat the acute phase of multiple sclerosis.

Mebendazole/ Niclosamide are safe and dirt cheap, whereas the (slightly) disease changing MS drugs currently cost $50,000+ a year.

TCF4 links everything together

Wnt signalling needs to be active to block premyelinated oligodendrocytes into transforming into oligodendrocytes (OL). So by inhibiting Wnt signalling you may remove one of the problems in MS; you probably only need to do this during relapses of MS.  

There actually is a finally stage to getting the oligodendrocytes (OL) to myelinate many axons and not be lazy.

In the jargon “dysregulation of Wnt–β-catenin signaling in OLPs results in profound delay of both developmental myelination and remyelination”.

A miss-expression of TCF4 is clearly also going to affect myelination and its does in both Pitt Hopkins and MS.

One feature of Pitt Hopkins (caused by haploinsufficiency of the transcription factor 4) is indeed delayed myelination measured via MRI at the age of 1. By the age of 9 white matter (the myelin-coated part of your brain) appears normal. This fits with what I highlighted in red under figure 6 above.

Nothing is simple. Activating Wnt signalling is known to increase expression of TCF4.  

Dysregulation of the Wnt pathway inhibits timely myelination and remyelination in the mammalian CNS

The progressive loss of CNS myelin in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) has been proposed to result from the combined effects of damage to oligodendrocytes and failure of remyelination. A common feature of demyelinated lesions is the presence of oligodendrocyte precursors (OLPs) blocked at a premyelinating stage. However, the mechanistic basis for inhibition of myelin repair is incompletely understood. To identify novel regulators of OLP differentiation, potentially dysregulated during repair, we performed a genome-wide screen of 1040 transcription factor-encoding genes expressed in remyelinating rodent lesions. We report that ∼50 transcription factor-encoding genes show dynamic expression during repair and that expression of the Wnt pathway mediator Tcf4 (aka Tcf7l2) within OLPs is specific to lesioned—but not normal—adult white matter. We report that β-catenin signaling is active during oligodendrocyte development and remyelination in vivo. Moreover, we observed similar regulation of Tcf4 in the developing human CNS and lesions of MS. Data mining revealed elevated levels of Wnt pathway mRNA transcripts and proteins within MS lesions, indicating activation of the pathway in this pathological context. We show that dysregulation of Wnt–β-catenin signaling in OLPs results in profound delay of both developmental myelination and remyelination, based on (1) conditional activation of β-catenin in the oligodendrocyte lineage in vivo and (2) findings from APC^Min mice, which lack one functional copy of the endogenous Wnt pathway inhibitor APC. Together, our findings indicate that dysregulated Wnt–β-catenin signaling inhibits myelination/remyelination in the mammalian CNS. Evidence of Wnt pathway activity in human MS lesions suggests that its dysregulation might contribute to inefficient myelin repair in human neurological disorders 

Potential Tcf4-catenin activities in oligodendrocyte development

The pattern of Tcf4 protein expression, from P1 to P30 and during remyelination after injury, defines the window of potential canonical Wnt pathway functions. Within this context, we observed that Tcf4 expression marked ∼15%–20% of OLPs at any given stage assessed. These findings were consistent with two possibilities. First, Tcf4 expression could demarcate a subset of OLPs. Second, it was possible that Tcf4 expression transiently marks all (or the vast majority) of OLPs during development. Our functional evidence strongly supports the latter conclusion, based on the fact that activity of activated β-catenin is Tcf-dependent (van de Wetering et al. 2002), coupled with the robust phenotype in DA-Cat and APC^Min animals, in which we observe pervasive effects of Wnt pathway dysregulation on myelin production throughout the CNS. Interestingly, although Tcf4 proteins are coexpressed with nuclear Olig1 proteins, Tcf4 segregated from cells expressing Olig1 mRNA transcripts, consistent with the possibility that Tcf4 is expressed at a transition stage when nuclear Olig1 proteins become down-regulated during remyelination.

Previous work has suggested inhibitory functions of Tcf4 on myelin basic protein gene expression in vitro (He et al. 2007), and our studies indicate that Tcf4 interactions with β-catenin inhibit myelination in vivo. Additional studies are warranted to rule out possible β-catenin-independent roles for Tcf4 in oligodendrocyte development. Although Wnt pathway activation has conventionally been thought of as activating gene targets, recent work has identified novel Tcf–β-catenin DNA regulatory binding sites that repress targets (Blauwwkamp et al. 2008). In this regard, one intriguing candidate target is HYCCIN (DRCTNNB1A), a Wnt-repressed target (Kawasoe et al. 2000) with essential roles in human myelination (Zara et al. 2006), which is expressed in rodent oligodendrocytes and down-regulated in Olig2cre/DA-Cat mice (Supplemental Fig. 8). Further studies are needed to better understand Tcf4–catenin function and its direct gene targets during oligodendrocyte lineage progression.

Wnt pathway dysregulation in OLPs as a mechanism leading to chronic demyelination in human white matter diseases

Therapeutic opportunities might arise from an enhanced understanding of the process regulating normal kinetics of remyelination. How might the negative regulatory role of the canonical Wnt pathway help to explain the pathology of demyelinating disease? Delayed remyelination due to Wnt pathway dysregulation in OLPs could lead to chronic demyelination by OLPs then missing a “critical window” for differentiation (Miller and Mi 2007; Franklin and Ffrench-Constant 2008). This “dysregulation model” of remyelination failure requires the Wnt pathway to be active during acute demyelination, as suggested by data from our animal systems and human MS tissue.

Canonical WNT signaling has been implicated in a variety of human diseases (Nelson and Nusse 2004), and gain-of-function mutations in β-catenin are etiologic in several cancers including the majority of colon adenocarcinomas. Approaches for treating Wnt-dependent cancers by promoting differentiation (and hence cell cycle arrest or apoptosis) using pharmacological inhibitors of the pathway are under development (Barker and Clevers 2005). It is possible that such antagonists might play a role in the therapeutic enhancement of remyelination by normalizing the kinetics of myelin repair. If so, the animal models described here (e.g., APC^+/−) should be useful in preclinical testing. However, it is important to note that while dysregulation of a pathway might delay remyelination, it is overly simplistic to expect that inhibition of the same pathway would accelerate repair in the complex milieu of an MS lesion in which several inhibitory pathways might be active, compounded by the presence of myelin debris (Kotter et al. 2006). Indeed, because of the need to synergize with other processes (e.g., those associated with inflammation), accelerated differentiation might negatively affect repair (Franklin and Ffrench-Constant 2008). Further work is needed to comprehensively understand interactions of regulatory networks required for optimal remyelination and how these may be dysregulated in human demyelinating diseases.

Neurologic and ocular phenotype in Pitt-Hopkins syndrome and a zebrafish model.

Abstract

In this study, we performed an in-depth analysis of the neurologic and ophthalmologic phenotype in a patient with Pitt-Hopkins syndrome (PTHS), a disorder characterized by severe mental and motor retardation, carrying a uniallelic TCF4 deletion, and studied a zebrafish model. The PTHS-patient was characterized by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with diffusion tensor imaging to analyze the brain structurally, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography to visualize the retinal layers, and electroretinography to evaluate retinal function. A zebrafish model was generated by knockdown of tcf4-function by injection of morpholino antisense oligos into zebrafish embryos and the morphant phenotype was characterized for expression of neural differentiation genes neurog1, ascl1b, pax6a, zic1, atoh1a, atoh2b. Data from PTHS-patient and zebrafish morphants were compared. While a cerebral MRI-scan showed markedly delayed myelination and ventriculomegaly in the 1-year-old PTHS-patient, no structural cerebral anomalies including no white matter tract alterations were detected at 9 years of age. Structural ocular examinations showed highly myopic eyes and an increase in ocular length, while retinal layers were normal. Knockdown of tcf4-function in zebrafish embryos resulted in a developmental delay or defects in terminal differentiation of brain and eyes, small eyes with a relative increase in ocular length and an enlargement of the hindbrain ventricle. In summary, tcf4-knockdown in zebrafish embryos does not seem to affect early neural patterning and regionalization of the forebrain, but may be involved in later aspects of neurogenesis and differentiation. We provide evidence for a role of TCF4/E2-2 in ocular growth control in PTHS-patients and the zebrafish model. 


Conclusion  

If you have a myelinating disease, you might want to read up on TCF4 and Wnt signalling. Probably not what the Minions take to read on the beach in the Maldives.

We also should recall the importance of what I am calling the "what, when and where" in neurological disorders. This is important for late onset disorders like schizophrenia, since the symptoms often develops in late teenage years and so it is potentially preventable, if identified early enough.

Today we see that TCF4 is expressed in white matter only in early childhood. If you knew what changes take place in the brains of children who go on to develop schizophrenia, you might well be able to prevent its onset.

Preventing some autism is already possible, as has been shown in mouse models, but in humans it is more complicated because of the "when" and quite literally the "where". There will be a post showing how the brain overgrowth typical of autism can be prevented using bumetanide, before it occurs, at least in mice.