UA-45667900-1
Showing posts with label Tangeretin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tangeretin. Show all posts

Monday 27 July 2015

Verapamil, Autism, Summertime Allergy, Asthma and Eczema


















As the symptoms get stronger, so does the therapy, 
going up in steps from May to July/August and then down to October


Today’s post is a practical one.  There is an interesting scientific one in preparation all about applying the emerging science of gene silencers and enhancers. 

I discovered in previous years that the summertime raging exhibited by Monty, now aged 12 with ASD, could be prevented using a small dose of the L-type calcium channel blocker, Verapamil.  Verapamil is also a mast cell stabilizer and blocks potassium channels linked to some inflammatory response.

This summer the story has repeated itself.  As the amount of airborne allergens increases from spring to summer the same seemingly mild allergy symptoms return.  So in late spring there was some sneezing and by mid-summer some eczema (atopic dermatitis) behind the knees and finally a very mild amount of asthma (slight wheezing); all of which were easily treated.

This apparently mild allergy triggers a flare-up in autism that is anything but mild.  To treat that the “silver bullet”, so to speak, is Verapamil.  It has a short half-life and so after 3-4 hours, depending on the initial dose, the effect is lost.  So in the peak of the allergy season, 20 mg every 4 hours provides near guaranteed protection.  Skipping a dose, like first one in the morning, will almost guarantee a mood change to agitation and then extreme anger.  That mood reverses within a few minutes of treatment again with Verapamil.

In late spring and early summer the use of allergy treatments (Azelastine, plus quercetin) and verapamil twice a day keeps things all under control.  But once the first faint signs of asthma reappear, due to the growing allergy effect, the only way to maintain normalcy is to make more frequent use of small doses of verapamil.  Using more antioxidants (NAC) does not have any effect; the verapamil addresses a summertime need.

In a previous post I did mention that I tried verapamil on a winter-time flare-up, just to see.  It had no effect whatsoever.  That problem was traced back to losing milk teeth and was solved with some ibuprofen, which was later replaced with Sytrinol/Tangeretin, the PPAR gamma agonist.  

Some children with autism are treated long term with Ibuprofen, or other NSAIDs, on a daily basis.  I have no doubt that it can be effective in specific cases, but the known side effects made me look for a safe alternative, which turned out to be Sytrinol.  Sytrinol has exactly the same effect as Ibuprofen, for this kind of flare-up, with no apparent side effect. Sytrinol is not a painkiller.

Since the roots of the final four milk teeth take several months to melt away and all the time levels of the inflammatory cytokine IL-6 are raised, there will be recurring behavioral flare-ups in those with the kind of over-activated immune system common in autism.  It seems plausible that the PPAR gamma agonist is down regulating  the activated microglia and thus blunting the immune over-reaction.  Anyway it works, for whatever reason.

The mast cells, degranulating due to allergens, release histamine and IL-6, the histamine causes further subsequent release of IL-6. Verapamil blocks this process.  The IL-6 released by the body to signal teeth to dissolve clearly is not reduced by Verapamil. 

The amount of inflammatory cytokines (IL-6 etc) produced by allergy is logically over a different order of magnitude to that used to signal milk teeth to dissolve.  The effect of Sytrinol is perhaps too mild to sufficiently dampen the response to the IL-6.   Maybe it helps somewhat, but I really cannot say one way or the other.

There seems to be a good case for Sytrinol year round and then Verapamil as required.  When I next update my Polypill formulation, Sytrinol will be included.

I think Verapamil likely has beneficial pleiotropic effects and so, in those who well tolerate it, it might be useful year round.  A small number of people do experience side effects.
     







Wednesday 6 May 2015

Tangeretin vs Ibuprofen, as PPARγ agonists for Autism. What about PPARγ for Epilepsy?




Summary of the therapeutic actions of PPARγ in diabetic nephropathy


I did write an earlier post about NSAIDs (Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) like Ibuprofen, which I expected to have no effect on autism.

  


However, to my surprise, I found that certain types of autism “flare-up” do respond very well to Ibuprofen.  Based on the comments I received, it seems that many other people have the same experience.

NSAIDs work by inhibiting something called COX-2, but they also inhibit COX-1.  The side effects of NSAIDs come from their unwanted effect on COX-1.

NSAIDs are both pain relievers and, in high doses, anti-inflammatory.  Long term use of NSAIDs is not recommended, due to their (COX-1 related) side effects.


Observational Study

All I can say is that in Monty, aged 11 with ASD, and with his last four milk teeth wobbly but refusing to come out, the increase in the cytokine IL-6 that the body uses to signal the roots of the milk teeth to dissolve seems to account for some of his flare-ups.  I do not think it is anything to do with pain.

This is fully treatable with occasional use of Ibuprofen and then “extreme behaviours” are entirely avoided.


Sytrinol (Tangeretin) vs Ibuprofen

Since Ibuprofen, when given long term, has known problems, I looked for something else.

On my list of things to investigate has been “selective PPAR gamma agonists”, which is quite a mouthful.  The full name is even longer.  The nuclear transcription factor peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARy) regulates genes in anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant and mitochondrial pathways.  All three of these pathways are affected in autism.

We already know that non-selective PPARy agonists, like pioglitazone, developed to treat type 2 diabetes, can be used to treat autism.  The problem is that being “non-selective” they can have nasty side effects, leading to Pioglitazone being withdrawn in some markets.
  

  
While looking for a “better” PPARγ agonist, I came across the flavonoid Tangeretin, which is commercially available in a formulation called Sytrinol.

An effective PPARγ agonist would have many measurable effects.  The literature is full of natural substances that may, to some degree, be PPARγ agonists, but you might have to consume them by the bucket load to have any effect.

The attraction of Sytrinol is that it does have a measurable effect in realistic doses.  Sytrinol is sold as a product to lower cholesterol.  Tangeretin is a PPARγ agonist and you would expect a PPARγ agonist to improve insulin sensitivity and also reduce cholesterol. There are clinical trials showing this effect of Sytrinol.


Sytrinol (Tangeretin) Experiment

The most measurable effect of using Sytrinol for six weeks is that we no longer need any Ibuprofen.  It is measurable, since I am no longer needing to buy Ibuprofen any more.

About three days a week Monty’s assistant would need to give him Ibuprofen at school.  This all stopped, even though occasional complaints about wobbly teeth continue.

Nobody markets  Sytrinol (Tangeretin) as a painkiller.

Note:- Sytrinol capsules contain a blend of 270mg PMF (polymethoxylated flavones, consisting largely of tangeretin and nobiletin) + 30mg tocotrienols. Nobiletin is closely related to tangeretin, while tocotrienols are members of the vitamin E family.  All three should be good for you.


Tangeretin and Ibuprofen are both PPARγ agonists

The explanation for all this may indeed be that Tangeretin and Ibuprofen are both PPARγ agonists.  Inhibiting COX-2 may have been irrelevant.


  
It may be that by regulating the anti-inflammatory genes, via  PPARγ, the Sytrinol has countered the “flare-up” caused by the spike in IL-6.

Anyway, in the earlier post we did see that research shows that dissolving milk teeth is signalled via increased IL-6 and we do know that increased IL-6, caused by allergies, can trigger worsening autism. 

So it does make sense, at least to me.

Regular uses of Sytrinol/Tangeretin looks a much safer bet than any NSAID.

If anyone tries it, particularly those who regularly use NSAIDs, let us all know.



PPARγ and Epilepsy

If you Google PPARγ and autism you will soon end up back at this blog.

For any sceptics, better to Google PPARγ and Epilepsy.  Epilepsy looks to be the natural progression of un-treated classic autism.  If this progression can be prevented, that should be big news.

Prevention is always better than a cure.  All kinds of conditions appear to be preventable, or at least you can minimize their incidence.  

Here are just the ones I have stumbled upon while researching autism:- Asthma  (Ketotifen), type 2 diabetes (Verapamil), prostate cancer (Lycopene) and many types of cancer (Sulforaphane).

There are of course types of epilepsy unconnected to autism, but epilepsy, seizures and electrical activity are highly comorbid with classic autism




Abstract

Approximately 30% of people with epilepsy do not achieve adequate seizure control with current anti-seizure drugs (ASDs). This medically refractory population has severe seizure phenotypes and is at greatest risk of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Therefore, there is an urgent need for detailed studies identifying new therapeutic targets with potential disease-modifying outcomes. Studies indicate that the refractory epileptic brain is chronically inflamed with persistent mitochondrial dysfunction. Recent evidence supports the hypothesis that both factors can increase the excitability of epileptic networks and exacerbate seizure frequency and severity in a pathological cycle. Thus, effective disease-modifying interventions will most likely interrupt this loop. The nuclear transcription factor peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARy) regulates genes in anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant and mitochondrial pathways. Preliminary experiments in chronically epileptic mice indicate impressive anti-seizure efficacy. We hypothesize that (i) activation of brain PPARy in epileptic animals will have disease modifying effects that provide long-term benefits, and (ii) determining PPARy mechanisms will reveal additional therapeutic targets. Using a mouse model of developmental epilepsy, we propose to (1) elucidate the cellular, synaptic and network mechanisms by which PPARy activation restores normal excitability;(2) demonstrate the significant contribution of mitochondrial health in pathologic synaptic activity in epileptic brain;(3) demonstrate inflammatory regulation of PPARy in epileptic brain;and (4) determine whether PPARy activation extends the lifespan of severely epileptic animals. The proposed studies, spanning in vivo and in vitro systems using a combination of techniques in molecular biology, electrophysiology, microscopy, bioenergetics and pharmacology, will provide insight into the interplay of seizures, mitochondria, inflammation and homeostatic mechanisms. The results will have tremendous, immediate translational potential because PPARy agonists are currently used for clinical treatment of Type II Diabetes. PPARy is under investigation as treatment for a wide variety of other neurological diseases with cell death and inflammation as common denominators;therefore, the results of this proposal will have a broad impact.

Public Health Relevance

Approximately 30% of people with epilepsy do not achieve adequate seizure control with current anti-seizure drugs (ASDs). This medically refractory population has severe seizure phenotypes and is at greatest risk of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Therefore, there is an urgent need for detailed studies identifying new therapeutic targets with potential disease- modifying outcomes.




Activation of cerebral peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors gamma exerts neuroprotection by inhibiting oxidative stress following pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus.

Abstract

Status epilepticus (SE) can cause severe neuronal loss and oxidative damage. As peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) agonists possess antioxidative activity, we hypothesize that rosiglitazone, a PPARgamma agonist, might protect the central nervous system (CNS) from oxidative damage in epileptic rats. Using a lithium-pilocarpine-induced SE model, we found that rosiglitazone significantly reduced hippocampal neuronal loss 1 week after SE, potently suppressed the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and lipid peroxidation. We also found that treatment with rosiglitazone enhanced antioxidative activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione hormone (GSH), together with decreased expression of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) in the hippocampus. The above effects of rosiglitazone can be blocked by co-treatment with PPARgamma antagonist T0070907. The current data suggest that rosiglitazone exerts a neuroprotective effect on oxidative stress-mediated neuronal damage followed by SE. Our data also support the idea that PPARgamma agonist might be a potential neuroprotective agent for epilepsy.




CONCLUSION:

The present study demonstrates the anticonvulsant effect of acute pioglitazone on PTZ-induced seizures in mice. This effect was reversed by PPAR-γ antagonist, and both a specific- and a non-specific nitric oxide synthase inhibitors, and augmented by nitric oxide precursor, L-arginine. These results support that the anticonvulsant effect of pioglitazone is mediated through PPAR-γ receptor-mediated pathway and also, at least partly, through the nitric oxide pathway.



Note that elsewhere in this blog I have already highlighted that PPAR alpha agonists also seem to have an effect against epilepsy.  For example in this research:-


          

I was originally interested in PPAR-alpha, because of its role in regulating mast cells.  It seems that PPARγ also affects mast cells.


  


PPARγ modulators – drugs vs neutraceuticals vs functional food

It does seem that many people with inflammatory diseases, epilepsy, autism and even people who are obese, might greatly benefit from selective PPARγ agonists.

The choice would be between drugs, “nutraceuticals” and functional (good) food.

The drugs have not yet arrived that are safe and selective.  The current Thiazolidinedione (TZD) class of drugs TZDs tend to increase fat mass as well as improving insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance in both lab animals and humans.




Since its identification in the early 1990s, peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ), a nuclear hormone receptor, has attracted tremendous scientific and clinical interest. The role of PPARγ in macronutrient metabolism has received particular attention, for three main reasons: first, it is the target of the thiazolidinediones (TZDs), a novel class of insulin sensitisers widely used to treat type 2 diabetes; second, it plays a central role in adipogenesis; and third, it appears to be primarily involved in regulating lipid metabolism with predominantly secondary effects on carbohydrate metabolism, a notion in keeping with the currently in vogue ‘lipocentric’ view of diabetes. This review summarises in vitro studies suggesting that PPARγ is a master regulator of adipogenesis, and then considers in vivo findings from use of PPARγ agonists, knockout studies in mice and analysis of human PPARγ mutations/polymorphisms.



As usual there are numerous “natural substances” that may also modulate PPAR-γ




A direct correlation between adequate nutrition and health is a universally accepted truth. The Western lifestyle, with a high intake of simple sugars, saturated fat, and physical inactivity, promotes pathologic conditions. The main adverse consequences range from cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and metabolic syndrome to several cancers. Dietary components influence tissue homeostasis in multiple ways and many different functional foods have been associated with various health benefits when consumed. Natural products are an important and promising source for drug discovery. Many anti-inflammatory natural products activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR); therefore, compounds that activate or modulate PPAR-gamma (PPAR-γ) may help to fight all of these pathological conditions. Consequently, the discovery and optimization of novel PPAR-γ agonists and modulators that would display reduced side effects is of great interest. In this paper, we present some of the main naturally derived products studied that exert an influence on metabolism through the activation or modulation of PPAR-γ, and we also present PPAR-γ-related diseases that can be complementarily treated with nutraceutics from functional foods.



Conclusion

If you are one of those people successfully using NSAIDs, like Ibuprofen, to reduce autistic behaviors, you might well be in the group that would benefit from Sytrinol/Tangeretin.

If NSAIDs never help resolve your autism flare-ups, Sytrinol/Tangeretin may not help either.

Tangeretin does appear to have other effects, beyond not needing to use Ibuprofen.  It was found to be a potent antagonist at P2Y2 receptors.

Suramin is another potent P2Y2 antagonist and Suramin is showing a lot of promise in Robert Naviaux’s autism studies at the University of California at San Diego.  Suramin is not viewed as safe for regular use in humans.








Wednesday 18 March 2015

The Role of Microglia in the Puzzle of Neuro-inflammation in Autism





Regular readers of this and similar blogs will have noticed that the human body functions in quite irrational ways.  We know why this is; we are the product of a very slow evolutionary process, rather than being a clean-sheet design like your smart phone or iPad.

As a result, nothing is ever quite as simple as it seems and at times the cleverer you are, the less likely you are to find a medical therapy effective in humans.

Such is the case with autism, inflammation and microglia.

It might seem that you can track back inflammation in autism to its “root cause”, which could appear to be those immune cells in the brain, called microglia.  We know they are “activated” in autism and we know that autism is typified by an “over-activated” immune response.

Working with the assumption that autism is a brain dysfunction, you would assume that the effective therapy should be inside the so-called blood brain barrier (BBB).

You would then just look for a potent drug that could “stabilize” the microglia/immune cells in the brain, to calm things down.  Having achieved this, you would sit back and marvel at the behavioral change and improvement in cognitive function.

This was exactly the thought process a few years ago when the US  National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) got together with the Johns Hopkins researchers to follow up on their findings of chronic inflammation in the brains of people with autism.  Subsequent, third party, research has also confirmed that the microglial cells are “activated” in autism


Trial Description


There is a subgroup of children with autism that appear to develop typically for a period of time, and then lose skills, or regress. A recent study by Vargas and co-workers at Johns Hopkins has demonstrated that the regressive subtype of autism is associated with chronic brain neuroinflammation as exemplified by activation of microglia and astroglia and the abnormal production of inflammatory cytokines and growth factors assayed in both tissue samples (brain banks) and CS. The authors remarked that these responses were similar to those seen in some neurodegenerative disorders such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and that chronic microglia activation appears to be responsible for a sustained neuroinflammatory response that facilitates the production of multiple neurotoxic mediators. Chronic neuroglial activation could be the result of an abnormal persistence of a fetal development pattern. In this scenario neuroglial activation could play a role in initiating and in maintaining the pathology. Alternatively, neuroglial activation may only be a secondary response to the initiating causal factor(s) and not a direct effector of injury. Since neuroglial activation requires the nuclear translocation of the pro-inflammatory transcription factor NF-kappa B, and since inhibitors of NF-kappa-B with good CNS penetrance are available, the role of neuroinflammation in initiating and sustaining the autistic condition can be probed.
The antibiotic minocycline is a powerful inhibitor of microglial activation, apparently through blockade of NF-kappa-B nuclear translocation. Minocycline is neuroprotective in mouse models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and Huntington's disease and has been recently shown to stabilize the course of Huntington's disease in humans over a 2-year period.
To evaluate the possibility of benefit in autistic children, we propose to conduct an open-label trial of the anti-inflammatory antibiotic minocycline, an agent that reduces inflammation by blocking the nuclear translocation of the proinflammatory transcription factor NF-kappa-B. Minocycline is Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for treatment of a variety of infections and has been widely used for the treatment of adolescent acne. Minocycline is currently in phase III trials for the treatment of Huntington's disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
This proposal is for an initial 6-month, single-arm, off label, open-label study (with a 3 month extension phase offered to responders) that will evaluate dose safety and efficacy of minocycline in 10 children, ages 3 to 12 years, with a primary diagnosis of autism and a history of developmental regression. The subjects will be evaluated by a diagnostic/behavioral assessment, and the extent of neuroinflammation judged by CSF cytokine/chemokine profiles before and after the 6-month treatment. Subjects will also be given 0.6 mg/kg vitamin B6 twice a day as a prophylactic for possible minocycline induced nausea and vomiting. If the results of this feasibility study are encouraging, we expect to conduct a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of minocycline therapy.


Nothing happens fast in the world of autism and so this six month study of 10 people (who completed the actual trial) was conceived in 2006, was actually concluded in 2013.  Here is the resulting paper:-
  


Conclusions
Changes in the pre- and post-treatment profiles of BDNF in CSF and blood, HGF in CSF and CXCL8 (IL-8) in serum, suggest that minocycline may have effects in the CNS by modulating the production of neurotrophic growth factors. However, in this small group of children, no clinical improvements were observed during or after the six months of minocycline administration.

Unfortunately, this study showed that a treatment, known to effectively stabilize microglial cells, had no positive effect on autism and actually seemed in some cases to make it worse.

We can conclude from this that stabilizing the microglia will not be the “holy grail” for treating autism.  Rather, the activated microglia is just one part of a complex, and only partially understood process.


Microglia as the Immunostat 

In a recent post we saw how Rodney Johnson referred to the microglia as the “immunostat” of the body.  Like the thermostat on the wall in your home central heating system.



This is indeed an interesting analogy and might explain some of what is going on.

We saw in Johnson’s paper all the ways that the immune system outside the blood brain barrier (BBB) was able to communicate with the microglia.  We should assume that this communication works both ways; something that is usually overlooked.

In a perfectly functioning body, as in a perfectly functioning house, the immunostat/thermostat gives a good indication of the actual state/temperature, as well as the one you intended.  So if you set your room thermostat to 72 Fahrenheit / 22 Celsius  you expect the actual temperature to be 72 Fahrenheit / 22 Celsius.

However, in the real world things do not work like this.

We live in a house with very large south facing windows, a big fireplace, underfloor heating in some places and European-style hot water radiators (in the US they do have them).  So we have at least four sources of heat.  In spite of having clever German electronics to control our heating system, the thermostat in the centre of the house, by itself, is not adequate.

Something similar is happening in body and brain of people with autism, just replace temperature with inflammation.

Just as my house has multiple systems resulting in heating, the human body has numerous processes leading to “inflammation”.  Some of these inflammatory processes are interconnected and some are not.  The net result at any one time can be measured by looking at various cytokine levels, gene expression, microglial activation and numerous other things; there is no single measurable thing called “inflammation”.

There will never be a single wonder anti-inflammatory treatment.

The activated state of the microglia rather than being the ultimate target for intervention may just be a reflection of inflammation elsewhere in the body, or alternatively it may be just the result of oxidative stress in the brain.

Just like after a few years you may need to replace your wall thermostat, because it is giving false data, the clever immunostat, that may be the microglia, could have been disrupted by all that oxidative stress in the brain.  It might even be sending its proinflammatory signal in reverse, back across the BBB, to the rest of the body. Not such a crazy idea?


The future of anti-inflammatory interventions

The NIMH and Johns Hopkins would naturally be disappointed by the results of their study; but it was a study well worth doing.  Hopefully they will pursue other avenues of thought.

We already know that there are numerous ways to achieve a degree of immuno-modulatory change and that in some types of autism there can be a profound behavioral impact.

These range from simple Ibuprofen, to steroids like Prednisone; not to mention those Kv1.3 blockers and ShK-peptides.  These will likely all affect the microglia, but it is not their main mode of action.


Insights

As is often the case, there are useful insights that you can learn from a “failed” trial.

I would imagine that an autistic person with ulcerative colitis would also have activated microglia. Treating that person with minocycline should have some stabilizing influence on the microglia, but without resolving the ulcerative colitis, the pro-inflammatory signals continue to be sent around the body.

Turning down the thermostat in my house, when I have a big log fire blazing, has no effect on the temperature. 

The microglia in the brain of people with autism probably should not be activated; we really need to know why they are activated.

If you can work on the numerous processes/pathways leading to “inflammation” you would most likely also achieve some deactivation of the microglia.

Therefore we should look at things like PPAR gamma which are directly relevant to the pathology of autism, and agonists of PPAR gamma also happen to be “anti-inflammatory” and indeed, in the test tube, some can stabilize microglia.

One, far away, day they will bring those ShK-peptides to the market. 

In the meantime, my current targets are Tangeretin and Nobiletin, flavonoids found in tangerines.


For the scientists among you:-

In addition to being a PPAR gamma agonist, Tangeretin is also a known P2Y2 receptor antagonist.  Both properties are potentially useful.

PPAR gamma has been covered in this blog already.  P2 receptors are a class of Purinergic receptor.  Within the field of purinergic signalling, these receptors have been implicated in learning and memory, locomotor and feeding behavior, and sleep. 

Suramin is used in research as a broad-spectrum antagonist of P2 receptors.

It is Suramin that Robert Naviaux, at UC San Diego, has been researching as a potent autism therapy.  He has shown it effective in mouse models, but the problem is that it is not safe for long term use in humans.  Regular readers should note that, yet again, an anti-parasite drug has been found to have an effect in autism.  Parasites do not cause autism, but understanding them better would be a potential advantage.

Why Suramin, a Century-Old, Anti-Parasitic Drug May Hold the Key to Understanding Autism


Dr. Robert Naviaux's recent finding suggests reversible metabolic syndrome could be at core of autism



The full paper is below:-




In particular, P2Y11 is a regulator of immune response.  There are big gaps in the science and I have no idea if tangeretin affects P2Y11.











Thursday 26 February 2015

Inflammation Leading to Cognitive Dysfunction


Today’s post highlights a paper with some very concise insights into how microglial cells become “activated” resulting in the “exaggerated inflammatory response” that many people with autism experience on a daily basis.  

This is very relevant to treatment, which is not usually the objective of much autism research.

I recall reading a comment from John’s Hopkins about neuroinflammation/activated microglia in autism; they commented that no known therapy currently exists and that, of course, common NSAIDs like ibuprofen will not be effective.  But NSAIDs are effective.

As we see in today’s paper, there a least 4 indirect cytokine-dependent pathways leading to the microglia, plus one direct one.
NSAIDs most definitely can reduce cytokine signaling and thus, indirectly, reduce microglial activation.

The ideal therapy would act directly at the microglia, and as Johns Hopkins pointed out, that does not yet exist with today's drugs.  If you read the research on various natural flavonoids you will see that “in vitro” there are known substances with anti-neuroinflammatory effects on microglial activation.  The recurring “problem” with such substances is low bioavailability and inability to cross the blood brain barrier.


Back to Today’s Paper

It was a conference paper at the 114th Abbott Nutrition Research Conference - Cognition and Nutrition



The paper is not about autism, it is about more general cognitive dysfunction.  It is from mainstream science (I checked).

It explains how inflammation anywhere in the body can be translated across the BBB (Blood Brain Barrier) to activate the microglia.  This of course allows you to think of ways to counter these mechanisms.

It also raises the issue of whether or not anti-inflammatory agents really need to cross the BBB.  While you might think that ability to cross the BBB is a perquisite to mitigate the activated microglia, this may not be the case.  Much can be achieved outside the BBB, and we should not rule out substances that cannot cross the BBB.

Very many known anti-inflammatory substances do not cross the BBB.   

  



extracts from the above paper ...








Example – Influenza and Cognition

Neurological and cognitive effects associated with influenza infection have been reported throughout history.

The simplest explanation for these neurocognitive effects is that influenza virus makes its way to the brain, where it is detected by neurons.

However, most influenza strains, including those responsible for pandemics, are considered non-neurotropic, neurological symptoms associated with influenza infection are not a result of direct viral invasion into the CNS.

Moreover, neurons do not have receptors to detect viruses (or other pathogens) directly.

Cells of the immune system do, however, as the immune system’s primary responsibility is to recognize infectious pathogens and contend with them. For example, sentinel immune cells such as monocytes and macrophages are equipped with toll-like receptors (TLR) that recognize unique molecules associated with groups of pathogens (i.e., pathogen-associated molecular patterns). Stimulation of TLRs that recognize viruses (TLR3 and TLR7) and bacteria (TLR4) on immune sentinel cells can have profound neurological and cognitive effects, suggesting the immune system conveys a message to the brain after detecting an infectious agent. This message is cytokine based.

Macrophages and monocytes produce inflammatory cytokines (e.g., interleukin [IL]-1β, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α [TNF-α]) that facilitate communication between the periphery and brain.


Cytokine-dependent Pathways to the Brain

Several cytokine-dependent pathways that enable the peripheral immune system to transcend the blood-brain barrier have been dissected.

Inflammatory cytokines present in blood can be actively transported into the brain.
But there are also four indirect pathways:-

1.     Cytokines produced in the periphery need not enter the brain to elicit neurocognitive changes. This is because inflammatory stimuli in the periphery can induce microglial cells to produce a similar repertoire of inflammatory cytokines. Thus, brain microglia recapitulates the message from the peripheral immune system.

2.     in a second pathway, inflammatory cytokines in the periphery can bind receptors on blood-brain barrier endothelial cells and induce perivascular microglia or macrophages to express cytokines that are released into the brain

3.     In a third pathway, cytokines in the periphery convey a message to the brain via the vagus nerve. After immune challenge, dendritic cells and macrophages that are closely associated with the abdominal vagus have been shown to express IL-1β protein; IL-1 binding sites have been identified in several regions of the vagus as well. When activated by cytokines, the vagus can activate specific neural pathways that are involved in neurocognitive behavior. However, activation of the vagus also stimulates microglia in the brain to produce cytokines via the central adrenergic system 

4.     A fourth pathway provides a slower immune-to-brain signaling mechanism based on volume transmission.  In this method of immune-to-brain communication, production of IL-1β by the brain first occurs in the choroid plexus and circumventricular organs—brain areas devoid of an intact blood-brain barrier. The cytokines then slowly diffuse throughout the brain by volume transmission, along the way activating microglia, neurons, and neural pathways that induce sickness behavior and inhibit cognition.


Can Flavonoids Reduce Neuroinflammation and Inhibit Cognitive Aging?

Flavonoids are naturally occurring polyphenolic compounds present in plants. The major sources of flavonoids in the human diet include fruits, vegetables, tea, wine, and cocoa.  Significant evidence has emerged to indicate that consuming a diet rich in flavonoids may inhibit or reverse cognitive aging

Flavonoids may improve cognition in the aged through a number of physiological mechanisms, including scavenging of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species and interactions with intracellular signaling pathways. Through these physiological mechanisms, flavonoids also impart an anti-inflammatory effect that may improve cognition. This seems likely for the flavone luteolin, which is most prominent in parsley, celery, and green peppers.
Whereas luteolin inhibits several transcription factors that mediate inflammatory genes (e.g., nuclear factor kappa B [NF-κB]and activator protein 1 [AP-1]), it is a potent activator of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), which induces the expression of genes encoding antioxidant enzymes. A recent study of old healthy mice found improved learning and memory and reduced expression of inflammatory genes in the hippocampus when luteolin was included in the diet. Thus, dietary luteolin may improve cognitive function in the aged by reducing brain microglial cell activity.
Hence, the flavonoid luteolin is a naturally occurring immune modulator that may be effective in reducing inflammatory microglia in the senescent brain.

Conclusion
In light of the recent evidence suggesting microglial cells become dysregulated due to aging and cause neuroinflammation, which can disrupt neural structure and function, it is an interesting prospect to think dietary flavonoids and other bioactives can be used to constrain microglia. But how can flavonoids impart this anti-inflammatory effect? Although in vitro studies clearly indicate that several flavonoids can act directly on microglial cells to restrict the inflammatory response, results from in vivo studies thus far do not prove that dietary flavonoids access the brain to interact with microglia in a meaningful way. This is a complicated question to dissect because flavonoids reduce inflammation in the periphery and microglia seem to act like an “immunostat,” detecting and responding to signals emerging from immune-to-brain signaling pathways. Thus, whether dietary flavonoids enter the brain and impart an anti-inflammatory effect on microglia is an interesting question but one that is more theoretical than practical because what is most important is how the immunostat is adjusted, whether that is via a direct or indirect route. However, because flavonoids are detectable in the brain they most likely affect microglia both directly and by dampening immune-to-brain signaling.



Interesting Natural Substances

In no particular order, these are several very interesting flavonoids/carotenoids.  In the lab, they all do some remarkable things.

In humans, they also do some interesting things; how helpful they might be in autism remains to be seen.

Being “natural” does not mean they are good for you and have no side-effects.

Some of the following are very widely used and so you can establish if there are issues with long term use.  It also makes them accessible.


Quercetin (found in many fruits, numerous interesting effects)


and two Quercetin-related flavonoids:-

Kaempferol (widely used in traditional medicine)

Myricetin (has good and bad effects)



Lycopene  (from tomatoes, potent anti-cancer, does not cross the BBB)

  
Luteolin(in many vegetables, like broccoli) 

Apigenin (from chamomile, stimulates neurogenesis, PAM of GABAA, block NDMA receptors, antagonist of opioid receptors …)


Tangeretin (from tangerines, does cross the BBB, has potent effects in vitro)


Nobiletin (from tangerines)

Hesperidin (from tangerines)


Naringin (from Grapefruit, contraindicated with many prescription drugs)


Epicatechin/Catechin  (the chocolate/cocoa flavonoids, do cross the BBB, well researched)