MS, the gut, and Autism in males and females

 

There is quite a lot in this blog about MS (multiple sclerosis) because it is the classic myelin disorder and so is well researched. Many other neurological conditions, including some autism, also feature impaired myelination. 

One of the very cheap myelin therapies is the old anti-histamine drug Clemastine. I learnt this week that it will be trialed in children with Pitt Hopkins syndrome. It is a very logical choice and some parents have already trialed it. I used it for a few years and did feel there was a benefit. The key is to keep the dose low enough not to cause drowsiness. Very long term use may reduce acetylcholine in the brain, so it is not a forever medicine.

Then I saw some interesting research from Japan showing that it appears that multiple sclerosis starts in the gut.

We already know from interesting US research that you must have had the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) to be able to develop MS. It also depends on the age at which you caught the virus. The older you were, the bigger the risk of later developing MS. So it is best to get EBV very young, or avoid it entirely by vaccination (expected to be available in 10 years). EBV is also known to increase the risk of certain cancers, so I guess the vaccination will get adopted.

 

The role of the gut

For years, researchers have suspected that the gut plays an important role in neurological conditions. What has been missing is a clear explanation, a step-by-step account of how something happening in the intestine could influence the brain.

A recent study provides exactly that for Multiple Sclerosis.

 

How Intestinal Cells Trigger Multiple Sclerosis

Summary: For years, scientists have suspected that the gut plays a role in Multiple Sclerosis (MS), but the “smoking gun” linking the two has been elusive. A landmark study has finally identified the cellular mechanism: Intestinal Epithelial Cells (IECs)—the cells lining your gut—are acting as “accidental” messengers.

The study found that in patients with MS, these gut cells abnormally express MHC II, a protein that “presents” antigens to the immune system. This interaction mistakenly transforms ordinary immune cells into pathogenic Th17 cells, which then migrate from the gut directly to the central nervous system to attack the brain and spinal cord.

Key Facts

·         The Accidental Messenger: IECs do not normally “talk” to the immune system in this way. In MS, they begin expressing MHC II, which “primes” CD4+ T cells to become aggressive.

·         The Th17 Migration: Using “Kaede” protein tracking (which changes colour under light), researchers proved that these gut-primed Th17 cells physically travel from the intestine to the spinal cord to drive neuroinflammation.

·         Human Connection: The team used single-cell RNA sequencing on human biopsies to confirm that the same inflammatory patterns seen in mouse models are present in the intestines of human MS patients.

·         New Treatment Target: Most current MS therapies target B cells in the blood; this study suggests that treating the gut environment or blocking the antigen-presenting activity of gut cells could stop MS at its source.

 

This new knowledge should shift the focus of treatment away from simply suppressing the immune system after damage has started, toward stopping the problem earlier at its source. Future therapies may aim to block these abnormal gut signals, target specific inflammatory pathways, and use gut-focused treatments such as microbiome modulation and diet. Overall, the goal is to prevent the immune system from being mis-trained in the first place, rather than just managing the consequences later.

  

The actual study:-

Intestinal epithelial MHC class II induces encephalitogenic CD4 T cells and initiates central nervous system autoimmunity

The gut as an immune training ground

The key finding is that cells lining the gut, intestinal epithelial cells, can act as unexpected immune instructors.

In MS, these cells begin expressing MHC class II, a molecule normally used by immune cells to “present” antigens. This abnormal behavior turns the gut lining into a kind of misguided training center.

The result is:

• Activation of Th17 cells
• These cells become highly inflammatory
• They migrate from the gut to the brain and spinal cord
• They drive autoimmune attack on myelin

This is a causal pathway from gut to brain.

 

A shared biological axis

The gut is not just influencing the brain, it is actively programming immune cells that control it.

This gut-immune-brain axis likely operates across multiple conditions, including autism, asthma, and ADHD.

 

Intestinal epithelial cells and autism

Intestinal epithelial cells sit at the center of the gut–immune interface and may also play a role in Autism.

They have three key functions.

 

1. Barrier control

IECs regulate what passes from the gut into the body.

If this barrier is altered, microbial products and metabolites may enter circulation and immune activation may increase

Some studies in autism report increased gut permeability, suggesting altered epithelial function.

 

2. Immune signaling

IECs actively communicate with the immune system. They release cytokines, influence T-cell behavior and potentially affect pathways like Th17 cells

In MS, abnormal IEC signaling directly drives inflammation.

In autism, similar immune pathways are implicated, though less directly established.

 

3. Microbiome interpretation

IECs “read” signals from gut microbes.

·        balanced microbiome produces healthy regulatory signals

·        dysbiosis produces inflammatory signals

 

In autism, microbiome differences are common, meaning IEC signaling may be altered.

 

Autism - same axis, different outcome

In autism, we see:

• altered microbiome
• gut inflammation
• immune activation (including Th17/IL-17 in some cases)

 

The difference is timing and target.

 

Step	MS (Adult)	Autism (Early Life)
Gut signal	IEC activation	Dysbiosis / gut inflammation
Immune response	Pathogenic Th17 cells	Altered immune signaling
Brain effect	Myelin attack	Developmental disruption
Timing	Adulthood	Early childhood

 

Why more females have MS

Multiple Sclerosis is 2–4 times more common in females.

Females have:

• stronger immune responses
• two X chromosomes (more immune genes)
• greater responsiveness to immune signals

When the gut sends the wrong signal, females are more likely to amplify it into autoimmunity.

Hormonal shifts (e.g., pregnancy/postpartum) further support an immune-driven mechanism.

 

Why more males have Autism

Severe autism is 3–4 times more common in males.

Males show:

• higher vulnerability during early brain development
• only one X chromosome (less genetic backup)
• less regulated early-life immune signaling

When the gut–immune system is activated early, males are more likely to cross the threshold into neurodevelopmental disruption.

Females appear more protected via:

• neural resilience
• better early immune regulation
• genetic redundancy

 

The EBV connection: a required trigger

One of the most important recent discoveries is the role of Epstein-Barr Virus infection in MS.

Large longitudinal studies show:

• individuals not infected with EBV almost never develop MS
• after EBV infection, the risk of MS increases dramatically (around 30-fold)

This suggests EBV is a necessary but not sufficient factor.

 

How EBV fits the model

EBV infects and persists in B cells, altering immune behavior. It may:

• create immune cells that recognize both viral proteins and brain proteins (molecular mimicry)
• keep B cells chronically activated
• prime the immune system toward autoimmunity

 

A multi-hit model of MS

The emerging picture is that MS requires multiple aligned factors:

1.     EBV infection
creates autoreactive immune potential

2.     Gut immune dysregulation
generates inflammatory Th17 cells

3.     Environmental modifiers (e.g., low vitamin D)
reduce immune regulation

Together, these drive immune attack on the brain

EBV loads the gun, the gut pulls the trigger, and the immune system fires at the brain.

 

Why MS varies by latitude

MS prevalence increases with distance from the equator.

• Lower rates near the equator
• Higher rates in northern regions

This reflects environmental effects on immune regulation.

 

Vitamin D and sunlight

Reduced sunlight lowers vitamin D, which normally:

• suppresses excessive Th17 cells activity
• promotes immune tolerance

Low vitamin D removes a key brake on autoimmunity.

 

Infection timing

Epstein-Barr Virus infection often occurs later in higher latitude regions, triggering stronger immune responses.

 

Microbiome differences

Geography affects diet and microbial exposure, shaping the gut–immune axis.

 

Hygiene effects

Reduced early microbial exposure may impair immune training.

 

Why some conditions improve with age

A striking observation across medicine is that many children “grow out of” certain conditions.

This includes:

• Mild autism (in some cases)
• Asthma
• Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

This reflects a shared biological pattern.

 

The dynamic regulation model

Early life is a period of high instability:

• the gut barrier is still developing
• the microbiome is fluctuating
• the immune system is learning tolerance
• the brain is highly sensitive

This creates a system that is:

• more reactive
• more inflammatory
• more vulnerable

 

What Changes Over Time

Three stabilizing processes occur:

1. Gut stabilization

• microbiome becomes more consistent
• fewer abnormal immune triggers

2. Immune regulation improves

• better control of inflammation
• reduced overactivation (including Th17 pathways)

3. Brain maturation

• circuits strengthen
• compensatory pathways develop
• regulation improves

 

The threshold effect

Symptoms can be viewed as crossing a threshold:

• Above threshold → visible condition
• Below threshold → mild or no symptoms

As stability improves:

• inflammation ↓
• regulation ↑

The individual may drop below the clinical threshold (unless they keep lowering the diagnostic threshold, as with autism)

 

Implications for Treatment

Focus on stabilizing the system, not just suppressing symptoms.

Potential approaches:

• improve gut health and microbiome stability
• reduce inappropriate immune activation
• support metabolic resilience
• ensure adequate vitamin D and environmental exposure
• minimize chronic inflammatory triggers

 

For MS:

• targeting EBV and gut immune programming may prevent disease at its source

 

For autism and related conditions:

• early stabilization of the gut–immune axis may improve outcomes

 

Does severe autism improve with age?

Severe autism is not a fixed condition where everything is determined at the start of life. While some children begin with greater challenges than others, what happens over time depends heavily on how skills develop during the long period of childhood and adolescence. These include communication, social interaction, emotional regulation, and daily living abilities. Early progress in these areas can create a positive ripple effect, making future learning easier and more natural.

If certain skills are delayed or missed early on, development may be slower—but this does not mean progress is impossible. The brain remains capable of learning and adapting, even later in life. This means that outcomes are not set in stone, much is up to the parents.

What shapes these outcomes is a combination of factors. Biology plays an important role—things like brain plasticity, energy levels, and overall health can influence how easily a child can learn. Biology can be modified pharmacologically, which is what EpiphanyASD is all about.

Biology is only part of the picture. Therapy, education, and the home environment are equally important. Structured teaching, repetition, encouragement, and meaningful interaction all create opportunities for skills to develop.

Importantly, these factors interact with each other. When a child’s biological state improves, they become more receptive to learning. In turn, effective therapy and support can help build new abilities, which further improves confidence, behavior, and engagement. This creates a positive cycle where progress builds on progress. Nothing changes over night, it is a slow process. Increasing skill acquisition rate by just 10% can lead to a massive difference over a decade.

This is why outcomes in autism are so variable. Two children who start at a similar level can follow very different paths depending on the opportunities they have and how their abilities are supported over time.

There are also important developmental windows, particularly in early childhood, when learning certain skills is easier. However, these windows do not fully close. Progress may become slower later, but it is still very much possible. Many individuals continue to gain skills well into adolescence and adulthood.

In this way, severe autism is better understood as a dynamic developmental process rather than a fixed outcome. The trajectory can be changed, sometimes substantially, depending on how biology, learning, and environment come together over time.

 

A note on EBV

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), also known as human herpesvirus 4, is a common virus that infects most people and remains in the body for life. It is best known for causing infectious mononucleosis (“glandular fever”), especially when infection occurs in adolescence.

EBV spreads via saliva.

Childhood transmission is very common globally, but as hygiene increases it gets caught at older ages. In western countries kissing during adolescence is a major route.

90-95% of adults carry the EBV, the only question is at what age they were exposed.

Early exposure to EBV is less risky than late exposure. This fits the hygiene hypothesis, which has been covered in this blog and my book.

The hygiene hypothesis proposes that reduced exposure to microbes in early life results in less “training” of the immune system and causes higher risk of immune dysregulation in later life.

Exposure to pets at home will help train a young child’s immune system, but does not expose him/her to EBV, which is exclusively a human virus. 

Viruses, Bacteria, Fungi, Parasites and Altered Gene Expression, Relevant to Autism

Today’s post started life as a review of how some viruses affect gene expression and may help cause, or just trigger flare-ups in, some neurological disorders ranging from autism to MS (multiple sclerosis). 

Some people with autism are treated with anti-viral drugs and, anecdotally, some do respond well.  This is not yet an area with hard facts and definitive clinical trials.  

It is actually better to first take a few steps back and consider how all microorganisms can play a role in human health by modifying the gene expression of the host (which is you).  There are four broad categories of microorganism.

Each type of microorganism can be countered by a matching category of pharmaceutical.

·        Antibacterials/antibiotics for bacteria

·        Antifungals to kill or prevent further growth of fungi

·        Antivirals to minimize (but often not eradicate) viruses

·        Antiparasitics to kill parasites  (protists)

All of the above categories of microorganism can affect the expression of multiple genes. By either up or down-regulating important genes at critical times during development, long lasting effects can be created, or there may be just transient effects.

Changes in gene expression likely play a role in many neurological conditions and in particular in what I call “flare-ups”, for example in autism, PANS, PANDAS and indeed schizophrenia.

Not all changes in gene expression are bad. The TSO parasites that do seem to help some people’s autism, by down regulating their immune response, very likely are modifying the host’s gene expression, which then reduces their immune response. This is the mechanism developed by the parasite to protect itself from the host (you) and ensure it is not eradicated.

Steroids affect the expression of multiple genes. When a bacteria of virus triggers PANDAS/PANS the positive effect of steroid therapy may well be by “resetting” the expression of certain important genes.  Here again, even though PANDAS/PANS is now treated clinically in the US, much remains unknown.

For those interested, earlier this summer revised treatment guidelines were published for PANDAS/PANS.

In "Part I–Psychiatric and Behavioral Interventions," Margo Thienemann, MD, Stanford University and coauthors present consensus guidelines for treating the psychiatric and behavioral symptoms of children with PANS/PANDAS. Symptom improvement is aimed at decreasing suffering, improving functioning, and making it easier for the children to adhere to therapeutic interventions.

In "Part II–Use of Immunomodulatory Therapies," Jennifer Frankovich, MD, and coauthors provide recommendations to help guide the use of therapies targeting the neuroinflammation and post-infectious autoimmunity that are common in PANS-PANDAS.

In “Part III–Treatment and Prevention of Infections," Michael Cooperstock, MD, MPH, University of Missouri School of Medicine (Columbia) and coauthors representing the PANS PANDAS Consortium, present a consensus guideline for managing the infection components of these neuropsychiatric conditions.

There is research on what virus/bacteria affects which specific gene, but this area of science is in its infancy.

MS (Multiple Sclerosis) a condition that features faulty remyelination, is likely a much simpler condition than autism and yet nobody knows for sure what causes it. It has been suggested that a virus may be the trigger of at least some types of MS, but researchers are decades away from proving anything. So when it comes to microorganisms and autism, it is mainly a case of speculation and the odd N=1 case study. 

Viral triggers of multiple sclerosis 

The relationship between infections and autoimmune diseases is complex and the mechanisms by which infectious pathogens could trigger MS are likely dynamic, i.e., they might change over time and not be mutually exclusive. Epidemiological observations indicate that viral infections could contribute to MS development not only as triggers of disease exacerbations but also as etiological agents, i.e., long before the disease becomes clinically apparent. The two- to three-folds increased risk of developing MS among individuals with history of IM compared with subjects who acquired EBV without symptoms, the almost universal seropositivity for EBV in adults and children with MS, and the steep and monotonic increase in MS risk with increasing titers of antibodies to EBV in apparently healthy adults could suggest that EBV infection is causally linked to MS development. The mechanisms responsible for this association are far from understood. Moreover, the incidence of IM in Western countries (≥ 5%)  exceeds the prevalence of MS in comparable populations (0.1%) by far (more than 50-fold) suggesting that yet unidentified genetic and/or additional environmental factors determine whether symptomatic EBV infection indeed predisposes to MS.

Although one particular MS-causing agent might still be discovered, current data suggest that multiple infections along with noninfectious environmental factors trigger the development of MS. These factors are likely ubiquitous, i.e., highly prevalent in the general population, and they require a permissive genetic background that predisposes for MS development. Future studies investigating infectious pathogens in a complex and heterogenous disease such as MS will benefit from careful and detailed clinical, pathological, and neuroimaging-based patient characterizations and from reproducibility in different study populations. In addition, novel humanized animal models of autoimmune diseases that are simultaneously permissive for viral pathogens which usually infect only humans  should allow investigation of specific aspects of host–pathogen interactions during autoimmune CNS inflammation in vivo. The integration of these data might eventually allow us to better define the role of viruses in the etiology and pathogenesis of MS and how virus–host interactions could be targeted for MS therapy.  

Hidden herpes virus may play key role in MS, other brain disorders

The ubiquitous human herpesvirus 6 may play a critical role in impeding the brain's ability to repair itself in diseases like multiple sclerosis. These findings may help explain the differences in severity in symptoms that many people with the disease experience

What is still not fully understood is the relationship between the extent of the viral infection in the brain and the severity of diseases like multiple sclerosis and other demyelinating diseases such as leukodystrophies and Vanishing White Matter disease. For example, do the number of infected cells need to reach a certain threshold before OPC function is impeded? Are individuals who have congenital HHV6 more vulnerable to severe forms of these diseases?

"More research is needed to understand by which mechanisms the virus impedes the function of OPCs and what impact this has on the progression of these diseases," said Mayer-Proschel. "But it is clear that HHV6, while not necessarily the cause of demyelinating diseases, is limiting the ability of the brain to repair damage to myelin thereby potentially accelerating the progression of these diseases."  

Mainstream and “Alternative” Research  

Not all published research fits with the current mainstream scientific consensus. The mainstream is clearly moving towards the realization that all kinds of things can affect gene expression. One currently fashionable area is the gut microbiota, as in this article:-

Gut's microbial community shown to influence host gene expression

Some researchers develop hypotheses that go much further, like this one regarding autism’s elder brother, schizophrenia.

Schizophrenia: A Pathogenetic Autoimmune Disease Caused by Viruses and Pathogens and Dependent on Genes 

Many genes have been implicated in schizophrenia as have viral prenatal or adult infections and toxoplasmosis or Lyme disease. Several autoantigens also target key pathology-related proteins. These factors are interrelated. Susceptibility genes encode for proteins homologous to those of the pathogens while the autoantigens are homologous to pathogens' proteins, suggesting that the risk-promoting effects of genes and risk factors are conditional upon each other, and dependent upon protein matching between pathogen and susceptibility gene products. Pathogens' proteins may act as dummy ligands, decoy receptors, or via interactome interference. Many such proteins are immunogenic suggesting that antibody mediated knockdown of multiple schizophrenia gene products could contribute to the disease, explaining the immune activation in the brain and lymphocytes in schizophrenia, and the preponderance of immune-related gene variants in the schizophrenia genome. Schizophrenia may thus be a “pathogenetic” autoimmune disorder, caused by pathogens, genes, and the immune system acting together, and perhaps preventable by pathogen elimination, or curable by the removal of culpable antibodies and antigens.

And this one by the same author:-

Susceptibility genes are enriched in those of the herpes simplex virus 1/host interactome in psychiatric and neurological disorders.

Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) can promote beta-amyloid deposition and tau phosphorylation, demyelination or cognitive deficits relevant to Alzheimer's disease or multiple sclerosis and to many neuropsychiatric disorders with which it has been implicated. A seroprevalence much higher than disease incidence has called into question any primary causal role. However, as also the case with risk-promoting polymorphisms (also present in control populations), any causal effects are likely to be conditional. During its life cycle, the virus binds to many proteins and modifies the expression of multiple genes creating a host/pathogen interactome involving 1347 host genes. This data set is heavily enriched in the susceptibility genes for multiple sclerosis (P = 1.3E-99) > Alzheimer's disease > schizophrenia > Parkinsonism > depression > bipolar disorder > childhood obesity > chronic fatigue > autism > and anorexia (P = 0.047) but not attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, a relationship maintained for genome-wide association study data sets in multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer's disease. Overlapping susceptibility gene/interactome data sets disrupt signalling networks relevant to each disease, suggesting that disease susceptibility genes may filter the attentions of the pathogen towards particular pathways and pathologies. In this way, the same pathogen could contribute to multiple diseases in a gene-dependent manner and condition the risk-promoting effects of the genes whose function it disrupts.

Back to Autism

As we have seen previously in this blog, autism is usually polygenic, meaning very many different genes are affected. This does not mean that anything is necessarily defective in those genes, it just means those genes are either over or under-expressed, this means you end up with either too much, or too little, of whatever that gene makes.

So for a polygenic condition, where in one person hundreds of your 22,000 individual genes are likely over or under-expressed, we really do not want anything to come along and further miss-express critical genes.

Many genes are inter-related and so miss-expression of one can trigger a wave of further effects. This can be either good or bad.

The science is still in its infancy, so it will be many decades before it is translated into medicine, but we can certainly already say what may be happening.

The interactome is a relatively new word to describe the whole set of molecular interactions in a particular cell.

 For example, the well-known bacteria H.pylori that can cause stomach ulcers:- 

The protein-protein interaction map of Helicobacter pylori 

Over 1,200 interactions were identified between H. pylori proteins, connecting 46.6% of the proteome.

Just this one common bacterium affects half of the entire set of proteins expressed by a genome (the so called proteome).

So we should not be surprised if some bacteria or viruses have a bad, or indeed good, effect on autism.

This also bring us back to the idea of the holobiont and hologenome, which was introduced in an earlier post. The idea is that what really matters in human health is not just your genome, but the totality of what surrounds you, so that means everything living in you, on you and around you. That includes bugs, bacteria and also those of your pet dog.

All of these factors influence how your genes are expressed. During evolution your body has got used to things and if you make rapid changes, you may indeed upset the balance. So while chlorinating water may have an overall good effect, by killing all those bacteria your body had been expecting, there may be some negative effects. Humans evolved living close to animals, be it dogs or farm animals. We saw earlier that pregnant mothers who live with pets produce children with a lower incidence of asthma.

We also reviewed the hygiene hypothesis, which basically says that a bit of dirt is good for you.

So this post, rather than narrowing things down, really broadens them out.  Everything affects everything.  If you rock the evolutionary boat, don’t be surprised if strange things happen.

Taking Somali refugees to live in Sweden increased their incidence of autism. Is that really a surprise? Recall the Somali autism clusters in Sweden and San Diego.

Apparently, the Amish in the US have a low prevalence of autism. Is that really a surprise?  One reader recently suggested sending autistic people to live with the Amish, as a therapy. The possibly effective therapy would have been to send the parents to live with the Amish for a couple of years before the child was born.

So perhaps we should consider much autism, and indeed conditions like asthma, as collateral damage from modern living?  Life expectancy has risen, infant mortality has been greatly reduced, but the downside is that we now have much more autoimmune disease and that includes autism.

Autism and Microorganisms

Now back to autism and the four categories of microorganism.

Can parasites cause autism? Actually we know they can; for example cerebral malaria can result in it. But how often is this case? Probably very rarely.

Can fungi cause autism? Perhaps, but we know from many examples (including in the comments on this blog) that some fungi can make autism worse.  Is the fungus candida albicans growing in the intestines really an issue in most autism? I seriously doubt it, but oral thrush/candidiasis caused by inhaled steroids does seem to make autism worse and is reversible by removing the fungus. The effect seems more likely to be from the candida than the steroid, since inhaled steroids only mildly enter the bloodstream.

Can bacteria cause autism? Well streptococcus bacteria can cause OCD and cognitive impairment (PANDAS).

Can a virus cause autism? Antonio Persico, one of the more serious autism researchers, has suggested that some autism may be caused by polyomaviruses transmitted at conception from father to mother.

https://spectrumnews.org/news/could-a-virus-cause-autism/

Can the rubella virus cause autism? Some serious people do see a possibility, even in people who have been vaccinated.

Does Rubella Cause Autism: A 2015 Reappraisal? 

These both remain controversial hypotheses; but can viruses cause flare ups in autism, later in life? This is also controversial, but I think quite plausible.  It all depends which genes the virus causes to get miss-expressed.

Enough is known to say that odd changes in autism may potentially be triggered by the appearance of specific types of microorganism, but quite possibly most microorganisms have little, or no, negative effect in most people. So it is not a case of all viruses/bacteria will make autism worse, but it is likely true that some may have the potential to do so.

In trying to figure out possible causes of autism flare-ups, due consideration should be given to microorganisms.  This is another case of personalized medicine, with all its potential pitfalls.

The big risk is potentially becoming obsessed with non-existing bacteria, viruses, fungi or parasites.  

Back to Antivirals and Autism 

Finally we come back to where the original idea for this post came from; is there any basis of the use of antiviral drugs to treat autism?

DAN-type doctors do prescribe the antiviral drugs Valtrex, Famvir or Acyclovir.

https://www.tacanow.org/family-resources/diagnosing-and-treating-viral-infections-in-asd/

Antiviral drugs do not destroy their target virus they just inhibit its development.

Most of the antiviral drugs now available are designed to help deal with HIV, herpes viruses, the hepatitis B and C viruses, and influenza A and B viruses.

You identify a virus by looking for antibodies to that specific virus in the blood. You can test for antibodies that suggest if the infection is new and active, called IgM antibodies and you can test for antibodies that show the infection occurred sometime in the past, called IgG antibodies.

You would need to know which virus to test for, the common ones are:-

HSV 1:  Herpes Simplex Virus 1 causes canker sores in the mouth

HSV 2: Herpes Simplex Virus 2 causes genital herpes.

HHV 6: Human Herpes Virus 6 is commonly known as Roseola virus

EBV: Epstein-Barr Virus, causes the illness known as infectious mononucleosis

Measles

Rubella  

Herpes virus may be a trigger for autism

“We’re not saying that HSV-2 is responsible for infecting the [fetal] brain and causing autism,” stresses senior author Ian Lipkin, an infectious disease expert and epidemiologist at Columbia. Indeed, fetal infection with HSV-2 is so serious that it frequently leads to miscarriages or stillbirths. Rather, Lipkin suspects that HSV-2 is just one among many environmental insults that, when they arrive at a vulnerable point in fetal development in women predisposed to damaging reactions, may trigger ASD in the fetus.” 

Prevalence of Herpes Simplex Virus 1 and 2 Antibodies in Patients with Autism Spectrum Disorders 

Conclusion: Rate of contact with HSV1 and HSV2 assessed by the mean of detection of specific antibodies was similar between children with ASD and healthy controls.

Prevalence of HHV-6 and HHV-8 Antibodies in Patients with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Conclusion: Levels and seropositivity rate of antibodies to HHV-6 and HHV-8 do not differ between children with ASD and controls.

Prevalence and titre of antibodies to cytomegalovirus and epstein-barr virus in patients with autism spectrum disorder

CONCLUSION: Titre and seropositivity rate of antibodies to CMV and EBV are similar between children with ASD and healthy controls.

Valtrex 

Valtrex seems to be the antiviral most commonly prescribed in autism.  This is an off-label use, meaning Valtrex is not approved to treat autism.  Valtrex is active against most species in the herpesvirus family. In descending order of activity:

• Herpes simplex virus type I (HSV-1)
• Herpes simplex virus type II (HSV-2)
• Varicella zoster virus (VZV)
• Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)
• Cytomegalovirus (CMV)

So we might assume the people with autism who respond to Valtrex might have one of the above, or similar, viruses. Unless Valtrex has some other modes of action, unrelated to being an anti-viral, which remains a possibility. 

Mitochondrial Disease and Viral Infections

Since this post is already full of speculation, I will add some more. Some people say that their child’s mitochondrial disease was preceded by a viral infection, so how likely is it that a virus can trigger mitochondrial disease and then autism?  Again, this is not something anyone can prove, one way or the other, but it does look like your mitochondria are particularly vulnerable to viruses.

The virus will exploit the mitochondria to further its own development, perhaps in doing so, in some people with a pre-disposition, this triggers a process to chronic mitochondrial dysfunction.  Read the papers below for more on this subject.

Preliminary evidence of mitochondrial dysfunction associated with post-infective fatigue after acute infection with Epstein Barr virus. 

Viruses as Modulators of Mitochondrial Functions

Mitochondrial dynamics and viral infections: A close nexus

Highlights

Mitochondrial dynamics influences mitochondrial and cellular functions.

Mitochondrial dynamics is affected during viral infections.

Viruses exploit mitochondrial dynamics and mitophagy to benefit infectious process.

Virus-altered mitochondrial dynamics determines the outcome of infection.

Disruption of mitochondrial dynamics promotes viral pathogenesis.

If a virus can trigger mitochondrial disease, as we have seen a vaccination can, is there any possible merit in using antivirals years later?

Is there merit treating regressive autism, which is likely to be mitochondrial disease, immediately with antiviral drugs?

Is there merit treating autism flare-ups, that do not respond to PANDAS/PANS therapies, with antiviral drugs?

Is there merit treating MS (multiple sclerosis) immediately on diagnosis with antiviral drugs? Would MS flare-ups respond to antivirals?

My take

If I was to develop MS tomorrow, given there is currently no cure, I think I might want to try an antiviral, just in case it might actually do some good.

My son with classic autism did have a PANDAS-like regression last year, with sudden onset OCD and strange verbalizations. It all went away after a couple of weeks, having been treated as a PANDAS flare-up, as documented in an old post on this blog. If after a viral infection he developed a sudden onset regression I would certainly reread this post.

Readers of this blog with a clear case of mitochondrial disease might want to check for the commonly implicated viruses, since if one was never suppressed this might be something to consider.

So do antivirals have a place in treating autism?  There is no hard evidence to support their use, but I would not at all be surprised if a minority do genuinely benefit. I think the most likely group might be those who have a sudden regression from near typical. As with PANDAS/PANS, the sooner the treatment commences, the better the likely outcome. 

Could antivirals help control flare-ups that can occur in those already with autism? They could well help; ideally you would confirm the presence of the virus first.   

Conclusion

I recently watched an expert clinician talking about irritable bowel syndrome (IBS); he was very open about his opinion that science likely only understands about 30% of the disorder. When it comes to autism I think science may be only at the 10% mark. As a result you have to be very careful about saying anything definitive.

We know that very many things contribute to the prevalence of autism.  It looks more than likely that viruses, bacteria, fungi and parasites may, on occasion, play a role in some people’s autism.

But, just like we know that in some people vaccination can trigger mitochondrial disease and result in an autism diagnosis, this does not mean it is a common cause of autism. Vaccinations have saved hundreds of millions of lives, but it has long been known that they can have side effects and that is why there is a large industry-funded compensation scheme in the US.

So while parasites can in some circumstances lead to autism, this does not mean feeding bleach to children with autism is a clever idea. Nor does filling them with antibiotics to treat a non-existing bacteria.

You can see why mainstream medicine is not eager to treat autism.

Nonetheless, applying that meagre sounding 10% of understanding can yield results, when applied with caution.