UA-45667900-1
Showing posts with label Broccoli. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Broccoli. Show all posts

Sunday 26 October 2014

How to make Sulforaphane (Broccoli) at home

I hope he took his Sulforaphane


This month thousands of runners braved thick smog at the Beijing marathon, with some even donning masks as air pollution soared to 16 times the maximum recommended level.

Johns Hopkins have been trialing their Sulforaphane in China as a therapy to counter the health effects of air pollution.

It was proposed that the potent anti-oxidant and chemoprotective protective properties of Sulforaphane would be a cheap way to protect the health of people living in highly polluted environments.


 or the actual study:-



Abstract

Broccoli sprouts are a convenient and rich source of the glucosinolate, glucoraphanin, which can generate the chemopreventive agent, sulforaphane, an inducer of glutathione S-transferases (GST) and other cytoprotective enzymes. A broccoli sprout–derived beverage providing daily doses of 600 mmol glucoraphanin and 40 mmol sulforaphane was evaluated for magnitude and duration of pharmacodynamics action in a 12-week randomized clinical trial. Two hundred and ninety-one study participants were recruited from the rural He-He Township, Qidong, in the Yangtze River delta region of China, an area characterized by exposures to substantial levels of airborne pollutants. Exposure to air pollution has been associated with lung cancer and cardiopulmonary diseases. Urinary excretion of the mercapturic acids of the pollutants, benzene, acrolein, and crotonaldehyde, were measured before and during the intervention using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid and sustained, statistically
significant (P _ 0.01) increases in the levels of excretion of the glutathione-derived conjugates of benzene (61%), acrolein (23%), but not crotonaldehyde, were found in those receiving broccoli sprout beverage compared with placebo. Excretion of the benzene-derived mercapturic acid was higher in participants who were GSTT1-positive than in the null genotype, irrespective of study arm assignment.
Measures of sulforaphane metabolites in urine indicated that bioavailability did not decline over the 12-week daily dosing period. Thus, intervention with broccoli sprouts enhances the detoxication of some airborne pollutants and may provide a frugal means to attenuate their associated long-term health risks.

Now this blog is not about pollution, but you might be interested to know that such pollution not only increases cancer risk (plus respiratory diseases, of course) but also increases the incidence of autism.
  



How to make Sulforaphane at Home

Hopefully you can now see the potential benefits of Sulforaphane.  As I said in the earlier post, twenty years has passed since Johns Hopkins discovered Sulforaphane and there have been numerous studies and experiments done.  What follows is just my synthesis and conclusions of that work.


1.     Eating Broccoli

Broccoli does contain glucosinolate and the required enzyme myrosinase.  If you eat copious amount of raw broccoli or very lightly cooked (steaming for 2 minutes) you will produce Sulforaphane in your body.  The amount required would be literally pounds/kilos each and every day, to come close the therapeutic doses.

Frozen broccoli has no active myrosinase and over-cooked broccoli has no myrosinase.

Clever tricks developed to get round this include:-

·        Eating a small piece of raw broccoli (to provide  myrosinase) with your cooked broccoli
 ·        Adding a tiny amount of daikon radish to frozen broccoli.  This is really a great idea, since only 0.25% Daikon is needed, you get 99.75% broccoli and will never even notice or taste the daikon.  The idea is that this should be done by the food processor when they freeze the broccoli, you would not do anything at home.
  
Abstract
Frozen broccoli can provide a cheaper product, with a longer shelf life and less preparation time than fresh broccoli. We previously showed that several commercially available frozen broccoli products do not retain the ability to generate the cancer-preventative agent sulforaphane. We hypothesized that this was because the necessary hydrolyzing enzyme myrosinase was destroyed during blanching, as part of the processing that frozen broccoli undergoes. This study was carried out to determine a way to overcome loss of hydrolyzing activity. Industrial blanching usually aims to inactivate peroxidase, although lipoxygenase plays a greater role in product degradation during frozen storage of broccoli. Blanching at 86 °C or higher inactivated peroxidase, lipoxygenase, and myrosinase. Blanching at 76 °C inactivated 92% of lipoxygenase activity, whereas there was only an 18% loss in myrosinase-dependent sulforaphane formation. We considered that thawing frozen broccoli might disrupt membrane integrity, allowing myrosinase and glucoraphanin to come into contact. Thawing frozen broccoli for 9 h did not support sulforaphane formation unless an exogenous source of myrosinase was added. Thermal stability studies showed that broccoli root, as a source of myrosinase, was not more heat stable than broccoli floret. Daikon radish root supported some sulforaphane formation even when heated at 125 °C for 10 min, a time and temperature comparable to or greater than microwave cooking. Daikon radish (0.25%) added to frozen broccoli that was then allowed to thaw supported sulforaphane formation without any visual alteration to that of untreated broccoli.


2.     Eating Broccoli Sprouts

It was shown that broccoli seeds and broccoli sprouts (5 day old broccoli) contain highly concentrated amounts of glucosinolate and the required enzyme myrosinase.  It is reported to be about 20 times higher in sprouts than full grown broccoli.

Broccoli sprouts are eaten uncooked and so no myrosinase is lost in food preparation.

Following all the Johns Hopkins research and commercialization, in many parts of the world you can readily buy fresh broccoli sprouts, many sold by companies licensed by the company run by the son of the original researcher at John Hopkins.

It was reported that that original lead researcher tries to regularly eat 4oz (120g) a week of broccoli sprouts, which is not so much.

However if you want to achieve the therapeutic doses in the clinical trials this will not be enough.

Trials used between 50 and 150 micromoles of Sulforaphane.

Rather unhelpfully they do not equate this to a measure accessible to lay people. 

If you recall your high school chemistry just go to Wikipedia and look up Sulforaphane:

C6H11NOS2
177.29 g/mol

To convert to grams you just multiply by 177.29.

So the trials used dosages between 8.8 mg and 26.6 mg of sulforaphane.

Most of these trials are in adults and most people reading this blog are interested in treating children, so let’s work with the figure of 8mg of sulforaphane.




Abstract

Broccoli consumption may reduce the risk of various cancers and many broccoli supplements are now available. The bioavailability and excretion of the mercapturic acid pathway metabolites isothiocyanates after human consumption of broccoli supplements has not been tested. Two important isothiocyanates from broccoli are sulforaphane and erucin. We employed a cross-over study design in which 12 subjects consumed 40 grams of fresh broccoli sprouts followed by a 1 month washout period and then the same 12 subjects consumed 6 pills of a broccoli supplement. As negative controls for isothiocyanate consumption four additional subjects consumed alfalfa sprouts during the first phase and placebo pills during the second. Blood and urine samples were collected for 48 hours during each phase and analyzed for sulforaphane and erucin metabolites using LC-MS/MS. The bioavailability of sulforaphane and erucin is dramatically lower when subjects consume broccoli supplements compared to fresh broccoli sprouts. The peaks in plasma concentrations and urinary excretion were also delayed when subjects consumed the broccoli supplement. GSTP1 polymorphisms did not affect the metabolism or excretion of sulforaphane or erucin. Sulforaphane and erucin are able to interconvert in vivo and this interconversion is consistent within each subject but variable between subjects. This study confirms that consumption of broccoli supplements devoid of myrosinase activity does not produce equivalent plasma concentrations of the bioactive isothiocyanate metabolites compared to broccoli sprouts. This has implications for people who consume the recommended serving size (1 pill) of a broccoli supplement and believe they are getting equivalent doses of isothiocyanates.



Following consumption of 40 g of alfalfa sprouts or 6 placebo pills, no SFN or ERN metabolites were detected in plasma or urine from the four subjects in the control group (Figure 1). In contrast subjects who consumed 40 g of broccoli sprouts (150 and 71 μmoles glucoraphanin and glucoerucin, respectively) or 6 supplement pills (121 and 40 μmoles glucoraphanin and glucoerucin, respectively) had considerable amounts of SFN and ERN metabolites in both plasma and urine.







In 12 hours about 145 micromols of SFN and ERN were excreted in urine.  From the chart it looks likes SFN:ERN is about 2:1.  So assume about 95 micromols of SFN (sulforaphane).

In the following study using frozen sulforaphane made at Johns Hopkins about 85 micromols were excreted in 12 hours 








In the Johns Hopkins trial above the dosage was 800 μmol of glucoraphanin in GRR (the blue lines above) and 150 μmol of sulforaphane in SFR beverages (green lines above). The drugs were mixed with mango juice and water.

We compare the green line with the earlier study and see that 40 g of sprouts is a similar dose to 150 μmol of Johns Hopkins sulforaphane.

Now I did ask Johns Hopkins how many grams of broccoli sprouts yields 50 μmol of Johns Hopkins sulforaphane.  They did reply and said that the level varies among sprouts and so it is impossible to say.

We have seen in this blog, to date, that while nothing is 100% certain in autism or autism therapies, once you have exceeded a certain level of probability, it is worth giving things a try.  If you wait for 100% certainty, you will never move.

So while you will never know exactly how much sulforaphane is in your sprouts, it does look like a fair estimate is 3.8 μmol /g.

So if you want 50 μmol, then you would need to eat about 13g of sprouts a day.

To achieve the adult dose of 150  μmol you would need to eat 40g of sprouts a day.

As a double check compare this to what the original lead researcher is reporting to be taking, for preventative therapy.  He takes 4 oz. a week.  This is 113.4g or 16g a day.

This dose appears not to have harmed him, and he is now 91 years old!


Paul Talalay

Paul Talalay was born in Germany , but emigrated to England with his family in 1933, shortly after the Nazi Party came to power. He was educated at Bedford School and, in 1940, he travelled to the United States to enter Massachusetts Institute of Technology where he majored in biology

Talalay's career has been devoted to cancer research and the achievement of early protection against cell damage. A pioneer in the field of chemoprotective research strategies, Talalay and his colleagues devised simple cell culture methods for detecting phytochemicals which appear to boost enzymes that detoxify carcinogens in the body. This work led to the isolation of sulforaphane, found in broccoli, as a potent inducer of detoxifying phase two enzymes. These findings, published in 1992,  attracted worldwide attention as a major breakthrough in understanding the potential link between cruciferous vegetable consumption and reduced cancer risk.

Since I have no signs of any other Germans appearing on my Dean’s List and there are already plenty of Americans, he goes down as a German.  Nikola Tesla had the same problem, with four countries claiming him as their own (USA, Austria, Croatia and Serbia).

 
3.     Mixing Daikin Powder with Broccoli Powder

Many people do not like eating broccoli.  I do suggest you try eating it raw; it really is not bad at all, and much better than the soggy, over cooked, variety.

For those preferring powders and pills, the third method involves mixing freeze dried Daikin Radish with freeze dried broccoli.

It turns out that while the myrosinase in broccoli is not heat or cold stable, the daikon radish root is a good source of heat stable myrosinase.  This radish is commonly used in Japan and is available cheaply in freeze dried form.

This is the powder that was proposed to be added to Frozen broccoli, so that it would be a source of sulforaphane.

Broccoli powder is produced in large volumes for the supplement industry, which package it in capsules and sell it on to you.

Why nobody thought of including active myrosinase from daikon radish is beyond me.  It is not expensive.

There appears to be one broccoli supplement that does actually do what it says on the label and produce some  sulforaphane.  Perhaps it includes some Daikin powder ?  It was tested in the US.

That supplement is made in Australia.  It is not cheap.

It is claimed that:-

A 1-gram serve of EnduraCell powder is equivalent to 12 grams of fresh sprouts (with their sulforaphane inhibitors deactivated) and contains 30mg of Glucoraphanin that yields 12 mg Sulforaphane.

Research has shown that generally broccoli supplements do not perform, perhaps this one is different?


4.     Combining Broccoli Sprouts with Broccoli Powder

Since broccoli sprouts, like daikin radish, contains copious amounts of myrosinase, you could also combine fresh broccoli sprouts with broccoli powder.  This has actually been studied in research projects and does work.

Abstract
Sulforaphane (SF) is a chemopreventive isothiocyanate (ITC) derived from the myrosinase-catalyzed hydrolysis of glucoraphanin, a thioglucoside present in broccoli. Broccoli supplements often contain glucoraphanin but lack myrosinase, putting in question their ability to provide dietary SF. This study compared the relative absorption of SF from air-dried broccoli sprouts rich in myrosinase and a glucoraphanin-rich broccoli powder lacking myrosinase, individually and in combination. Subjects (n=4) each consumed 4 meals consisting of dry cereal and yogurt with 2 g sprouts, 2 g powder, both, or neither. Blood and urine were analyzed for SF metabolites. The 24 h urinary SF recovery was 74%, 49%, and 19% of the dose ingested from broccoli sprouts, combination, and broccoli powder meals, respectively. Urinary and plasma ITC appearance was delayed from the broccoli powder compared to the sprouts and combination. A liver function panel indicated no toxicity from any treatment at 24 h. These data indicate a delayed appearance in plasma and urine of SF from the broccoli powder relative to SF from myrosinase-rich sprouts. Combining broccoli sprouts with the broccoli powder enhanced SF absorption from broccoli powder, offering the potential for development of foods that modify the health impact of broccoli products.



Conclusion

More good news is that when you make sulforaphane in the above fashion, you also make some other interesting substances; one of these is Indole-3-carbinol (I3C).  I3C itself has some extremely interesting properties for both cancer and autism.  I3C up-regulates a protein called PTEN, encoded by the PTEN gene.  PTEN is dysfunctional in autism and, in general terms, may need to be up-regulated.  Indole-3-carbinol is one of the few, safe, known, ways to up-regulate PTEN.  PTEN is also a tumor suppressor gene and so in people with some cancers, up-regulating PTEN will slow cancer progression.

Anyway, it really does look like broccoli may be good for cancer and autism.


Bon Appetit!




Monday 20 October 2014

Sulforaphane (Broccoli) for Cancer, Autism and COPD





One advantage this blog has is that it looks at the comorbidities of autism, so we are aware of useful findings in related areas.  So it then does not come as a big surprise when a therapy effective in related areas also helps with autism.

One of the most useful is asthma.  Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a related condition, brought on by smoking or pollution.  It kills 3 million people a year; COPD is made much worse by chronic oxidative stress.  We saw in an earlier post that oxidative stress stops the asthma drugs from working.  The current treatment for oxidative stress in COPD is N-acetyl cysteine (NAC).  I recall they are still looking for a better treatment; perhaps the search is over.  (see later).

We also saw that there is already some overlap between “emerging” research findings in cancer and those in autism. These include:-

·        PAK1, mTOR (Rapamycin), Wnt signaling
·        Ivermectin treatment for Leukemia and Autism
·        Quercetin and NAC aiding recovery for specific cancers and helping some in autism

For twenty years researchers have known about the potential cancer fighting benefits of Sulforaphane, which is produced by a chemical reaction when you eat fresh broccoli that was only lightly cooked.

In the intervening years vast amounts of research has been going on to tinker with broccoli to maximize/harness the potential health benefit, and also to develop related synthetic drugs (analogs of Sulforaphane) like Sulforadex.

Twenty years later, and a vast amount of broccoli supplement pills later, not many people have benefitted.  When you look into the matter, it really is rather bizarre.

Fresh raw broccoli was found to contain large amounts of both Glucoraphanin and an enzyme called Myrosinase.  When you eat the raw broccoli the Glucoraphanin and Myrosinase react to produce a potent substance called Sulforaphane, which seems to have numerous positive effects.  A powerful anti-oxidative process is triggered that was shown to have a strong anti-cancer effect.

The problem is that myrosinase from broccoli is not stable; when you cook it, freeze it, or process it, you lose it.  So, soggy cooked broccoli, crisp frozen broccoli and almost all the broccoli pills on the market have no myrosinase and therefore no Sulforaphane will be produced.

There have been numerous studies showing this and also a few clever ideas to get around it have been investigated.

Sulforaphane is itself also unstable and has to be used immediately or kept frozen.


Johns Hopkins and Sulforaphane

Sulforaphane was discovered in 1992 at Johns Hopkins and much related research still comes from there.  They hold the key patents and indeed went as far as to try to stop other people growing/selling broccoli sprouts.  They have developed a way to produce Sulforaphane in the laboratory and then it is freeze dried and kept frozen at -20 Celsius.

Cancer research

The cancers where Sulforaphane has shown promise include:-


COPD

What caught my attention was a paper from 2008 by Peter Barnes, one of only two Englishmen on my Dean’s list and the only one that lives there.



This has been followed up and there is now a Phase 2 clinical trial of Sulforaphane for treatment of COPD.



Barnes is my kind of scientist.  He has noted that the most potent, safe antioxidant to treat COPD is NAC (N-acetyl cysteine) but he wanted more, and has been on the look-out for years for a stronger, but safe, alternative.  He concluded that

“It has been difficult to find new more effective antioxidants that are not toxic. A more attractive approach may be to restore Nrf2 levels to normal through inhibiting the action of Keap1. This has been achieved in vitro and in vivo by isothiocyanate compounds, such as Sulforaphane, which occur naturally in broccoli”


And finally to Autism

So the recent big news that Sulforaphane was remarkable successful in a small trial at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Johns Hopkins maybe should not be such a surprise.
Sulforaphane treatment of autism spectrum disorder (ASD)
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD), characterized by both impaired communication and social interaction, and by stereotypic behavior, affects about 1 in 68, predominantly males. The medicoeconomic burdens of ASD are enormous, and no recognized treatment targets the core features of ASD. In a placebo-controlled,double-blind, randomized trial, young men (aged 13–27) with moderate to severe ASD received the phytochemical sulforaphane (n = 29)—derived from broccoli sprout extracts—or indistinguishable placebo (n = 15). The effects on behavior of daily oral doses of sulforaphane (50–150 μmol) for 18 wk, followed by 4 wk without treatment, were quantified by three widely accepted behavioral measures completed by parents/caregivers and physicians: the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC), Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), and Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale (CGI-I). Initial scores for ABC and SRS were closely matched for participants assigned to placebo and sulforaphane. After 18 wk, participants receiving placebo experienced minimal change (<3.3%), whereas those receiving sulforaphane showed substantial declines (improvement of behavior): 34% for ABC (P < 0.001, comparing treatments) and 17% for SRS scores (P = 0.017). On CGI-I, a significantly greater number of participants receiving sulforaphane had improvement in social interaction, abnormal behavior, and verbal communication (P = 0.015–0.007). Upon discontinuation of sulforaphane, total scores on all scales rose toward pretreatment levels. Dietary sulforaphane, of recognized low toxicity, was selected for its capacity to reverse abnormalities that have been associated with ASD, including oxidative stress and lower antioxidant capacity, depressed glutathione synthesis, reduced mitochondrial function and oxidative phosphorylation, increased lipid peroxidation, and neuroinflammmation.

What surprised me was just how big an impact the Sulforaphane had and the fact that these are very serious researchers, unlike many others.

Since we are talking about a therapy that has a strong anti-oxidant connection I compared the trial results from the Stanford NAC trial, with those from the Sulforaphane trial at MGH.

Monty, aged 11 with ASD, responded almost immediately to NAC and so of course I am interested in any additional, even overlapping, therapy.

For anyone interested, the following table shows the results from the NAC study:-




The data shows a large drop in irritability and hyperactivity and a moderate improvement in stereotypy, compulsions and SIB.  On the Social Responsiveness Scale, the people on NAC dropped by 18 , versus a drop of 6 for the placebo group.
Now we have the results from the Sulforaphane (broccoli) study.

On the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) , the people on Sulforaphane dropped by 20, versus a drop of 2 for the placebo group.

Moving on to the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) we can compare the improvement in four sub-categories:-

NAC               Sulforaphane
Irritability                 -9.7                     -4
Lethargy                  -4.2                     -4.5
Stereotypy              -3.5                      -2.7
Hyperactivity           -11                      -4.8


Now these figures are averages.  In reality you are likely either a responder or non-responder, nobody is likely to be Mr. Average.

I found these results very encouraging, albeit less so than the NAC trial.  The Sulforaphane trial was conducted among young adults whereas NAC was trialed on children.  You might expect children to be more responsive, since their autism tends to be less controlled than it tends to be in adulthood.

Since both trials are drawn from a population with behavioral autism and not any biological specific dysfunction both groups will likely include people with :-

·        Classic early onset autism caused by multiple genetic and epigenetic (environmental) hits

·        Mitochondrial disease triggered regressive autism, with no inherent prior dysfunction

·        Single gene disorders, probably never identified

Any trial with responders > 30% is therefore very interesting.  This trial was much better than that.

Now, both classic autism and Mitochondrial disease triggered regressive autism are associated with oxidative stress.  People with classic autism do seem to respond to NAC, whereas some people with Mitochondrial disease do not.


















In the NAC trial the dose was stepped up every 4 weeks  (0.9g 1.8g 2.7g).  In the Sulforaphane trial the dose remained the same but the effect grew.

So the method of action of both drugs may be similar, but it is not identical.  NAC is a ”primary anti-oxidant”, in that NAC and its end product Glutathione (GSH) are themselves anti-oxidants.   

Sulforaphane appears to be a “secondary anti-oxidant”, it activates Nrf2 which then triggers a set of reactions that promotes an anti-oxidant response.  So it is logical that there is a time delay.

But after week 18, Sulforaphane treatment was stopped and at week 22 all benefit had been lost.


So we can conclude, even though these are two different trials with different groups of people, that if anything NAC looks more potent than Sulforaphane.

The question is whether Sulforaphane plus NAC would be even better than NAC (or Sulforaphane) alone.

  
Mode of Action

I know that NAC is a “direct” anti-oxidant and it is a precursor for glutathione (GSH); its effect is almost immediate, whereas the MGH researchers inform us that Sulforaphane became effective over a matter of weeks.  We know that Sulforaphane activates a transcription factor, Nrf2 in the cell. Once activated, Nrf2 then translocates to the nucleus of the cell, where it aligns itself with the antioxidant response element (ARE) in the promoter region of target genes. The target genes are associated with process which assists in regulating cellular defences. Such cytoprotective genes include that for glutathione (GSH).

So it is clear that both NAC and Sulforaphane will affect the level of the boy’s most important antioxidant glutathione (GSH).

That may possibly be the end of the story.

Science does tell us that Sulforaphane has many other effects that may also be beneficial in autism.  They do seem to have an effect in cancer and some do relate to reversing epigenetic “errors”.  Classic autism is also likely triggered, in part, by epigenetic “markers” on undamaged parts of the DNA.  Any method of selectively removing these markers and turning genes “off” that were “on” in error and vice versa is very interesting.

Sulforaphane’s effect in cancer appears to be more than just an antioxidant.  Research has shown that it is indeed active epigenetically (switching on and off genes).

The logical next step would be to test NAC vs Sulforaphane vs (NAC + Sulforaphane).

Since we live in an imperfect world, rather than wait half a century for a clinical trial, you might have to do a home trial.

In the next post we will see how to make Sulforaphane at home.

As is often the case, it is not as simple as buying some on Amazon.

Sulforaphane survives for 30  minutes outside the freezer and almost all broccoli supplements have been shown to have no active Myrosinase.  Without this enzyme almost no Sulforaphane will be produced, no matter how many broccoli tablets you take.

This reminds me of people buying oxytocin over the internet.  If it is not kept chilled, by the time it arrives at your place, a few days later, it will be totally inactive and so ineffective.  You will have wasted your money and perhaps falsely concluded that oxytocin is ineffective.

This is how the Sulforaphane is made by Johns Hopkins:-

Preparation of Sulforaphane-Rich Broccoli Sprout Extracts.

Sulforaphane rich broccoli sprout extract (SF-BSE) was prepared by the Cullman Chemoprotection Center at The Johns Hopkins University essentially as described in Egner et al. In brief, specially selected broccoli seeds were surface-disinfected and grown (sprouted) for 3 d in a commercial sprouting facility under controlled light and moisture conditions. A boiling water extract was prepared, filtered, cooled, and treated with the enzyme myrosinase (from daikon sprouts) to convert precursor glucosinolates to isothiocyanates, and
then lyophilized at a food processing facility (Oregon Freeze Dry, Albany, OR). The lyophilized powder (216 μmol SF/g powder) was encapsulated into #1 gelcaps by ALFA Specialty Pharmacy (Columbia, MD); each capsule contained 50 μmol SF (232 mg of SFBSE); placebo capsules were filled with microcrystalline cellulose.
The powders (bulk and capsules) were maintained at approximately
20 °C and repeatedly checked for microbial contaminants and SF
titer before conveyance to the study site pharmacy (Massachusetts
General Hospital) to be dispensed to patients.

  
Thanks to all the research done on Sulforaphane/broccoli as chemoprotective agent, all the pieces of the puzzle exist.  My first choice would always be the stable analog of Sulforaphane, but it is not yet available and will no doubt be ultra expensive.  So I will work with second best.

The nice people at Johns Hopkins did reply to my questions, so I think I have figured out what I needed to know.




                                           How to make Sulforaphane at home