PAK inhibitors and potentially treating some Autism using Grandpa’s Medicine Cabinet

I wrote several posts about why PAK1 inhibitors should be beneficial in some autism and indeed some schizophrenia.

We also saw that PAK1-blocking drugs could be potentially useful for the treatment of neurofibromatosis type 2, in addition to RAS-induced cancers and neurofibromatosis type 1.

One problem with drugs developed for cancer is that, even if they finally get approved, they tend to be ultra-expensive.  Production volumes are low because even if they “work” they do not prolong life for so long and cancer has numerous sub-types.

Cheap drugs are ones used to treat common chronic conditions like high blood pressure, high cholesterol and indeed treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), like benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

A small number of readers of this blog have confirmed the beneficial effect of PAK inhibitors in their specific sub-types of autism.  The problem is that there are no potent PAK1 inhibitors suitable for long term use that are readily available.

The anti-parasite drug Ivermectin is an extremely cheap PAK1 inhibitor, but cannot be used long term, due to its other effects.

Propolis containing CAPE (Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester) is a natural PAK1 inhibitor, but may not be sufficiently potent as is reported by people with neurofibromatosis.

You would think somebody would just synthesize CAPE (Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester) artificially and then higher doses could be achieved.

PAK Inhibitors and Treatment of Prostate Enlargement

I was rather surprised that research has recently been published suggesting that PAK inhibitors could be used to treat the prostate enlargement, common in most older men. 

P21-Activated Kinase Inhibitors FRAX486 and IPA3: Inhibition of Prostate Stromal Cell Growth and Effects on Smooth Muscle Contraction in the Human Prostate

Abstract

Prostate smooth muscle tone and hyperplastic growth are involved in the pathophysiology and treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Available drugs are characterized by limited efficacy. Patients’ adherence is particularly low to combination therapies of 5α-reductase inhibitors and α₁-adrenoceptor antagonists, which are supposed to target contraction and growth simultaneously. Consequently, molecular etiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and new compounds interfering with smooth muscle contraction or growth in the prostate are of high interest. Here, we studied effects of p21-activated kinase (PAK) inhibitors (FRAX486, IPA3) in hyperplastic human prostate tissues, and in stromal cells (WPMY-1). In hyperplastic prostate tissues, PAK1, -2, -4, and -6 may be constitutively expressed in catecholaminergic neurons, while PAK1 was detected in smooth muscle and WPMY-1 cells. Neurogenic contractions of prostate strips by electric field stimulation were significantly inhibited by high concentrations of FRAX486 (30 μM) or IPA3 (300 μM), while noradrenaline- and phenylephrine-induced contractions were not affected. FRAX486 (30 μM) inhibited endothelin-1- and -2-induced contractions. In WPMY-1 cells, FRAX486 or IPA3 (24 h) induced concentration-dependent (1–10 μM) degeneration of actin filaments. This was paralleled by attenuation of proliferation rate, being observed from 1 to 10 μM FRAX486 or IPA3. Cytotoxicity of FRAX486 and IPA3 in WPMY-1 cells was time- and concentration-dependent. Stimulation of WPMY-1 cells with endothelin-1 or dihydrotestosterone, but not noradrenaline induced PAK phosphorylation, indicating PAK activation by endothelin-1. Thus, PAK inhibitors may inhibit neurogenic and endothelin-induced smooth muscle contractions in the hyperplastic human prostate, and growth of stromal cells. Targeting prostate smooth muscle contraction and stromal growth at once by a single compound is principally possible, at least under experimental conditions.

It looks like a PAK inhibitor could potentially solve both the key problems in BPH and so replace the current therapies.

Existing Drugs for LUTS/BPH

Undoubtedly someone is going to wonder whether existing drugs for LUTS/BPH might improve autism.  This is actually possible, but totally unrelated to PAK1 inhibition and RASopathies.

Existing drugs are in two classes, 5α-reductase inhibitors and α₁-adrenoceptor antagonists.

α-adrenoceptor antagonists

Alpha blockers relax certain muscles and help small blood vessels remain open. They work by keeping the hormone norepinephrine (noradrenaline) from tightening the muscles in the walls of smaller arteries and veins, which causes the vessels to remain open and relaxed. This improves blood flow and lowers blood pressure.

Because alpha blockers also relax other muscles throughout the body, these medications can help improve urine flow in older men with prostate problems.

Selective α₁-adrenergic receptor antagonists are often used in BPH because it is the α₁-adrenergic receptor that is present in the prostate.

 α ₂-adrenergic receptors are present elsewhere in the body

Alpha-2 blockers are used to treat anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). They decrease sympathetic outflow from the central nervous system. Post-traumatic stress disorder is an anxiety disorder that is theorized to be related to a hyperactive sympathetic nervous system.

Alpha-2 receptor agonists for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder

So a nonselective alpha blocker, like one given to an older man with high blood pressure and BPH, might well have an effect on some kinds of anxiety.

You would think that a selective alpha 2 blocker might be interesting, how about Idazoxan?

Idazoxan is a drug which is used in research. It acts as both a selective α2 adrenergic receptor antagonist, and an antagonist for the imidazoline receptor. Idazoxan has been under investigation as an antidepressant, but it did not reach the market as such. More recently, it is under investigation as an adjunctive treatment in schizophrenia. Due to its alpha-2 receptor antagonism it is capable of enhancing therapeutic effects of antipsychotics, possibly by enhancing dopamine neurotransmission in the prefrontal cortex of the brain, a brain area thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia.

Mirtazapine is a cheap generic drug used at high doses for depression.  It happens to be a selective alpha 2 blocker, but it has numerous other effects as well.  One reader of this blog does respond very well to Mirtazapine.

So realistically in Grandpa’s medicine cabinet there might a selective alpha 1 agonist or a non-selective alpha agonist, it is the latter type that might have an effect on some kinds of autism.

5α-reductase inhibitors

The pharmacology of 5α-reductase inhibition involves the binding of NADPH to the enzyme followed by the substrate. Specific substrates include testosterone, progesterone, androstenedione, epitestosterone, cortisol, aldosterone, and deoxycorticosterone.

Beyond being a catalyst in testosterone reduction, 5α-reductase isoforms I and II reduce progesterone to 5α-dihydroprogesterone (5α-DHP) and deoxycorticosterone to dihydrodeoxycorticosterone (DHDOC).

In vitro and animal models suggest subsequent 3α-reduction of DHT, 5α-DHP and DHDOC lead to neurosteroid metabolites with effect on cerebral function.

These neurosteroids, which include allopregnanolone, tetrahydrodeoxycorticosterone (THDOC), and 5α-androstanediol, act as potent positive allosteric modulators of GABA_A receptors, and have anticonvulsant, antidepressant, anxiolytic, prosexual, and anticonvulsant effects.

Inhibition of 5α-reductase results in decreased conversion of testosterone to DHT.

This, in turn, results in slight elevations in testosterone and estradiol levels. 

In BPH, DHT acts as a potent cellular androgen and promotes prostate growth; therefore, it inhibits and alleviates symptoms of BPH. In alopecia, male and female-pattern baldness is an effect of androgenic receptor activation, so reducing levels of DHT also reduces hair loss.

A new look at the 5alpha-reductase inhibitor finasteride

Finasteride is the first 5alpha-reductase inhibitor that received clinical approval for the treatment of human benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and androgenetic alopecia (male pattern hair loss). These clinical applications are based on the ability of finasteride to inhibit the Type II isoform of the 5alpha-reductase enzyme, which is the predominant form in human prostate and hair follicles, and the concomitant reduction of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone (DHT). In addition to catalyzing the rate-limiting step in the reduction of testosterone, both isoforms of the 5alpha-reductase enzyme are responsible for the reduction of progesterone and deoxycorticosterone to dihydroprogesterone (DHP) and dihydrodeoxycorticosterone (DHDOC), respectively. Recent preclinical data indicate that the subsequent 3alpha-reduction of DHT, DHP and DHDOC produces steroid metabolites with rapid non-genomic effects on brain function and behavior, primarily via an enhancement of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic inhibitory neurotransmission. Consistent with their ability to enhance the action of GABA at GABA(A) receptors, these steroid derivatives (termed neuroactive steroids) possess anticonvulsant, antidepressant and anxiolytic effects in addition to altering aspects of sexual- and alcohol-related behaviors. Thus, finasteride, which inhibits both isoforms of 5alpha-reductase in rodents, has been used as a tool to manipulate neuroactive steroid levels and determine the impact on behavior. Results of some preclinical studies and clinical observations with finasteride are described in this review article. The data suggest that endogenous neuroactive steroid levels may be inversely related to symptoms of premenstrual and postpartum dysphoric disorder, catamenial epilepsy, depression, and alcohol withdrawal.

This would suggest that a 5α-reductase inhibitor, like finasteride, that might be among Grandpa’s tablets might very well have an effect on someone with GABAa dysfunction, this includes very many people with autism, schizophrenia and Down Syndrome.

Whether the effect will be good or bad is hard to say, and may well depend on whether other drugs that target GABA or NMDA receptors are being used. Due to their other effects, 5α-reductase inhibitors are usually only used in adults.

Merck developed a lower dose form of finasteride, called Prospecia to treat baldness, usually in men.  It is 20% the normal potency used for BPH.

Side effects

The current BPH drugs cause side effects in some people.  PAK1 inhibitors may also have some side effects.

Conclusion

Going back in the days of living with your extended family might make treating many people’s autism much simpler.  It looks like many older people’s drugs can be repurposed for some types of autism (ion channel modifying diuretics, calcium channel blockers, statins, even potentially intranasal insulin in some).  Because older people’s drugs are so widely used they are well understood and inexpensive.  

Clearly the research on PAK inhibitors for LUTS/BPH is at an early stage, but there is a huge potential market.   A widely available PAK1 inhibitor might be a big help to some people with autism, neurofibromatosis, other RASopathies, not just Grandpa’s prostate.

In addition to FRAX486 and IPA3, why doesn’t someone try synthetic CAPE, i.e. without the bees, as a PAK inhibitor?

Bioactivity and chemical synthesis of caffeic acid phenethyl ester and its derivatives.

There is far more chance of a PAK1 inhibitor coming to market for LUTS/BPH, or certain cancers than for autism.  That is a fact of life.

As for 5α-reductase inhibitors, like finasteride, we know from Hardan’s study on Pregnenolone at Stanford that this hormone can have a positive effect and we know that various natural steroid metabolites will modulate GABA subunits.  So it is quite likely that finasteride is going have a behavioral effect.  Perhaps Hardan would like to trial finasteride 5mg and 1mg (Prospecia) in some adults with autism. I suspect it will make some people “worse” and others somewhat “better”; so please do not report the “average” response, highlight the nature of the positive responders.

CAPE-rich Propolis for Autism?

CAPE (caffeic acid phenethyl ester) is a substance known to be an inhibitor of PAK1.  PAK1 has been shown at MIT to be implicated in various disorders including Fragile X and schizophrenia.  PAK1 inhibitors are also effective in research models of various cancers, including leukemia.

There are currently no approved PAK1 inhibitor drugs, although several are in development.

PAK1 is also implicated in Neurofibromatosis, and clinicians have researched various alternative PAK1 inhibiting substances.  The two most interesting ones that I have already written posts about are:-

·        Ivermectin, an old anti-parasite drug (also shown effective in leukemia)

·        BIO 30 propolis, rich in CAPE

Ivermectin is already used as an autism treatment by “alternative” doctors who think autism is caused by parasites.  We saw in a recent post that a study looking for parasites in people with autism (in the US) found none.  Ivermectin reportedly does improve autism, according to one reader of this blog and other anecdotal evidence.

I think Ivermectin is likely to be more potent than BIO30, but Ivermectin cannot be safely used continuously, without long breaks.

BIO-30 Trial

Having discussed the idea with one of the Japanese Neurofibromatosis clinicians, it seemed worthwhile to see the effect in our kind of autism.

As you may have seen in previous posts the science behind PAK1 is complex.  It has numerous, mainly bad, effects.  It is involved in dendritic spine morphology; this might be one area where ongoing “damage” is still being done.  So when asked what kind of change I expected/hoped to see, I said “cognitive improvement”.

According to recent research:-

CAPE alone has never been used clinically, due to its poor bioavailability/water-solubility; Bio 30 contains plenty of lipids which solubilize CAPE, and also includes several other anticancer ingredients that seem to act synergistically with CAPE.

Propolis is widely used as a natural remedy, but this was my first experience with it.  The first problem was how to take it; it sticks to everything.

My solution is to cut a small piece of toast and then apply 20 drops of propolis.  Since propolis has a strong flavor, I try to mask it with a layer of Nutella spread on top.

I gave this “honey medicine” at breakfast and in early afternoon.  

Trial Conclusion

There is a cognitive enhancing effect, noticeable not just to me.  The effect is visible almost straight away, but was more noticeable with a dose of 2 x 20 drops than with my original 1 x 20 drops.

At this dosage, it is not revolutionary, but it does indeed provide a real “nootropic”/cognitive enhancing effect.

Propolis for All?

At the dose I am using, I would think this “therapy” is only worthwhile in people whose autism is well-controlled already; meaning no stimming/stereotypy/OCD, allergies/GI problems all resolved, no aggression or anxiety;  these behaviours will mask any benefit.

I actually think this is the first thing I have come across that looks ideally suited for Asperger’s and other HFA.

I did look on line for people trying BIO30 for schizophrenia, all I found was someone else asking the same question:-

Apparently FRAX486 treats schizophrenia in mice due to PAK1 inhibition. Why does no one try Bio 30 Propolis for schizophrenia, as it is a PAK1 inhibitor as well?

Propolis does have numerous other ingredients, including many very interesting flavonoids.

As long as you are not one of the one percent of people with a bee allergy, propolis seems a very safe product.

If you live in Australia or New Zealand you can buy the CAPE-rich propolis locally.  As we learnt in previous posts, only two types of propolis were found to be PAK1 inhibitors, an expensive one from Brazil and the CAPE-rich BIO30 Propolis from New Zealand.

If anyone tries it, please let me know the result.  You only need one bottle and a few days to see if it has an effect.

PAK1 Therapy for Autism – All packed and ready to go!

Following up on recent posts about PAK1, whose presence is required for 70% of cancers to grow and MIT have implicated in several types of autism, I have collected all the data I can find to make trials of PAK1 inhibition in autism.

  

I contacted the leading Japanese researcher who has developed PAK1 therapies for various kinds of tumor, mainly found in neurofibromatosis, but also brain tumors and even epilepsy.  He suggested the dosage of the CAPE-rich propolis from New Zealand and also suggested another drug called Fingolimod/Gilenya.  

This drug is an immunomodulating drug, approved for treating multiple sclerosis, but it is also a PAK1 inhibitor.  It appears to cross the blood brain barrier.  The downside it that Gilenya is hugely expensive, costing around $50,000 a year.

  

While Tonegawa's group at MIT continue to develop their new PAK1 inhibitors, I am concerned that they will end up with a drug costing as much as Gilenya, which will put it out of reach of most people, even if it was effective.

So that brings me back to the trials I propose.

Trial 1   -  BIO 30 Propolis

This is a natural product and as such will appeal to many of this blogs readers.  It needs no prescription from your doctor.  You can buy it over the internet from numerous pharmacies in New Zealand.

The dosage proposed for autism by the Japanese Researcher is 1-2 ml per 10 kg of body weight.

It appears that about 1% of people have an allergy to bee products.  If you are in the 99%, it is reported that even very much larger doses of BIO 30 have no side effects.

Trial 2   -  Ivermectin/Stromectol

This is the cheap drug that is used to treat parasites, but turns out to be a PAK1 inhibitor.  It was also recently shown to kill leukemia cells.

Here I will draw on the autism worm-dosage used by Dr Wu, who prescribes Ivermectin in the belief that the autistic kids’ behaviours are driven by worms.

Dr Yu is combining Ivermectin with other anti-parasite drugs.  I am assuming he “got it right for the wrong reason”, in other words the worms are not the issue, PAK1 is the issue.

Below is the dosage Dr Yu suggests in his autism presentation and one case report where there was a before and after evaluation.  Here the ATEC was used, which is a scale designed by Bernard Rimland and Stephen M.Edelson of the Autism Research Institute (the DAN people).

  

From what I could find, a single dose of Ivermectin (Stromectol) should kill the parasites.  Pets are given the same drug on a regular basis, some preventatively.

In low doses it appears to be very safe, but not in high doses.

Strongyloidiasis is a human parasitic disease caused by the nematode (roundworm).  On the site RXLIST.com the dosage for Strongyloidiasis is:-

The above is for a single dose therapy.  Dr Wu’s worms are either much more resilient, or his much higher and multiple dose therapy is actually working for entirely different reasons.

Trial 3   -   Fingolimod/Gilenya

Given the huge cost of Gilenya, I cannot imagine anybody trying it for autism.  Perhaps Novartis would like to donate some?

We did cover immunomodulatory therapy in earlier posts and it was Dr Chez who likes to write about this subject, in relation to autism.  He has published several trials and a good book.

Perhaps he should do the Gilenya trial?

The Blood Brain Barrier

I did ask the Japanese researcher if CAPE, the anti-PAK1 ingredient of the New Zealand propolis can cross the blood brain barrier, since it is claimed that Ivermectin does not.  He says that BIO30 and Fingolimod/Gilenya cross the BBB.

This brings me to a slight diversion.

Why inflammation leads to a leaky blood-brain barrier: MicroRNA-155

In this research the aim was to confirm the mechanism behind why inflammation causes the blood brain barrier (BBB) to leak.  It has been suggested that the leaky BBB is a key part of autism.  The less leaky it is the better for autism.  Since pro-inflammatory agents like histamine and IL-6 really do make autism worse, it is highly relevant that the research shows that pro-inflammatory agents cause the BBB to let through more of the substances that it is supposed to keep out.

Perhaps the ever-present pro-inflammatory cytokines found in autism, mean that the BBB is always partially compromised.  A drug like Ivermectin might therefore pass more freely across the BBB, than would be expected in other people.

So Ivermectin might remain a cheap alternative to Gilenya.  Dr Yu’s case studies perhaps warrant some more serious attention.

Will it work?

There are good reasons why PAK1 inhibition should have a positive effect.  It is definitely not quack science, it is the serious MIT kind.

In treating Neurofibromatosis NF-1 tumors, it does seem to be more effective at stopping new tumors, rather than shrinking existing ones.   This perhaps should not be surprising, since PAK1 is needed for a tumor to grow and may not be needed for it to live.  At much higher doses, it is reported that existing tumors shrink. So with autism, maybe PAK1 is needed early on, before birth; blocking PAK1 in a 10 year old may be pointless.

The only way to find out for sure if it works in your type of autism is to try it.

If it does not work for Monty, aged 10 with ASD, we cannot say it will not work in somebody’s two year old with a different type of autism.

Also, in Monty, the PAK1 effect might already be being mitigated by his existing drugs.

It would be helpful if there was a clinical trial, but there is not.

Conclusion

Trial 1 is easy to do at home, and if you do it for a month, you would need two bottles of propolis, costing $50 including shipping from New Zealand.

Since the Nobel Laureate from MIT tells us that autism requires PAK1 and that, in mouse models of autism, PAK1 inhibitors are effective treatments, it seems odd nobody has tried it.  In PAK1-driven Neurofibromatosis, there are now many people claiming BIO30 to be effective.  In this condition you can measure/count the tumors, so I guess they should know if it works.

The MIT-inspired drugs, like Tonegawa’s FRAX486 will not be available for many years, and who knows how much they will cost.

In the case of Ivermectin, somebody really should look at the toxicology data and see how safe regular usage would be in humans.  The Leukemia researchers proposed this drug be actively developed, but nothing seems to have happened.  Just for a few days, Trial 2 would not seem to be too risky.

We agree to leave trial 3 to Dr Chez, in Sacramento.

Ivermectin for Parasites, but as a PAK1 Inhibitor for Autism, Cancer and Leukemia?

In recent posts I introduced a substance called PAK1.  This substance is implicated in the mechanism behind many cancers and research at MIT showed that is also involved in autism, fragile X and schizophrenia.

PAK inhibitors notjust for Cancer, Alzheimer’s and Neurofibromatosis, but also for Autism, Schizophrenia, Fragile X and Shank 3

 

In that post, I pointed out that a great deal of research is being done to create new drugs that act as PAK inhibitors, none of which are yet approved.

But I also highlighted that Neurofibramatosis sufferers have been using a naturally occurring PAK inhibitor, called CAPE, that can be found in certain types of bee propolis.

The researchers ended up choosing a New Zealand variety called BIO 30, but they also pointed out that certain Brazilian, and even one Chinese propolis, are known PAK inhibitors.  The problem with all natural “supplements” is the lack of consistency; it turns out that the PAK inhibiting power of BIO 30 varies from year to year and batch to batch.

It was interesting that an old generic drug called Ivermectin is also a known inhibitor of PAK.  Ivermectin is a very basic drug, used all round the world to kill parasites in the intestines.  Many people’s pet dogs are given the veterinary version year round, and life-long.  It is a very well-known substance.

So I thought I would Google “Ivermectin and autism”, not expecting to find anything interesting, but I did, and hence the origins of this latest post.

Autism and Parasites  

It turns out that many autistic kids in the US have been given the anti-parasitic drug, Ivermectin, by “alternative practitioners” who think autism is caused by parasites.  Yes, caused by parasites.

Previously in this blog we heard about an intriguing treatment for autism that involves intentionally swallowing TSO parasites (Helminthic therapy).

I think that TSO is very interesting.  It is now being developed by Coronado Biosciences as a therapy for several inflammatory conditions including:-

·        Crohn’s disease

·        Ulcerative Colitis

·        Autism

Here is a link to all the clinical trials they are running.

The idea behind TSO is that the parasites have evolved a method of ensuring their survival in their host, by subduing the immune system, so that they are not killed/ejected.  By down-regulating the immune system, they become a therapy for diseasing featuring an over active immune system.

This all started a few years ago when one autism Dad figured all this out and tried it on his own son.  Then began the long process of clinical trials, which then ended up with Coronado Biosciences.  The Dad’s website is here.

In the world of “alternative doctors” they are giving Ivermectin and Praziquantel for autism, in the belief that the problem is worms.  A Dr Yu, in particular, who even has a presentation for Autism One, believes de-worming helps autism.

In the real world, Ivermectin is both a de-wormer and a PAK inhibitor.

Dr Yu has, inadvertently, been giving a PAK inhibitor to kids with autism.  He seems very happy with result.  I take note of his success.

PAK1, Autism and Cancer

PAK1 is required for the growth of 70% of human cancers, including prostate, colon, and breast and also for neurofibromatosis.  Since PAK1 is also now known to be implicated in autism, you may be wondering if people with autism are more prone to cancer.

Well the good news is the first study I found said apparently not; but on digging a bit deeper the story is less clear

The Correlation between Rates of Cancer and Autism: An Exploratory Ecological Investigation

High correlations were found between autism rates and the incidence of in situ breast cancer (p≤10⁻¹⁰, modified inverse chi square, n = 16) using data from states that adhere strictly to the Code of Federal Regulations for diagnosing autism. By contrast, few significant correlations were observed between autism prevalence and the incidence of 23 other female and 22 male cancers.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that there may be an association between autism and specific forms of cancer.

 

Autism and cancer risk

Abstract

A literature review was conducted on the genetic and developmental bases of autism in relation to genes and pathways associated with cancer risk. Convergent lines of evidence from four types of analysis: (1) recent theoretical studies on the causes of autism, (2) epidemiological studies, (3) genetic analyses linking autism with mutations in tumor suppressor genes and other cancer-associated genes and pathways, and (4) contrasts with schizophrenia, Parkinson's, and Alzheimer's disease indicate that autism may involve altered cancer risk. This evidence should motivate further epidemiological studies, and it provides useful insights into the nature of the genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors underlying the etiologies of autism, other neurological conditions, and carcinogenesis.

Given how poor quality the data on autism incidence is, and that most people get cancer in old age, we should be very careful.  In a recent post we learned that many people in older age have autism, but were never diagnosed as such.  So it is likely that the true incidence of autism in cancer patients, is much higher than the data suggests.

It would seem highly plausible that autism might indeed predispose you to elevated cancer risk, so there is another good reason to look at PAK1 inhibitors.

Ivermectin and Leukemia

Leukemia /leukaemia is a cancer of the blood or bone marrow.

While this is a blog about autism, from time to time I do notice some very obvious signs towards therapies for other dysfunctions.  Both NAC and quercetin were shown to be beneficial in treating existing cancers; quercetin helped esophageal cancer and NAC was shown to helped breast cancer.

So when I checked to see if any cancer research had followed up on the cheap drug Ivermectin, I was pleased to see that somebody had thought of this already.   They had tested the effect of Ivermectin on leukemia cells, although they did not make the PAK1 connection.

The antiparasitic agent ivermectin induces chloride-dependent membranehyperpolarization and cell death in leukemia cells

 Ivermectin increased intracellular chloride ion concentrations and cell size in leukemia cells. Chloride influx was accompanied by plasma membrane hyperpolarization, but did not change mitochondrial membrane potential. Ivermectin also increased reactive oxygen species generation that was functionally important for ivermectin-induced cell death. Finally, ivermectin synergized with cytarabine and daunorubicin that also increase reactive oxygen species production. Thus, given its known toxicology and pharmacology, ivermectin could be rapidly advanced into clinical trial for leukemia.

   

Since Ivermectin is off-patent there is no financial interest for the private sector to research its use in clinical trials.  Perhaps Ivermectin should join NAC and quercetin on my list of cheap cancer drugs.

Conclusion

The conclusion is that Ivermectin may very well be an effective autism treatment, perhaps we should ask Dr Yu for some data?

The reason the Japanese researchers propose Propolis ahead of Ivermectin to treat Neurofibromatosis seems to be that in 99% of people there are no side effects, even at huge doses.  Ivermectin does react with many drugs.  Ivermectin does not normally cross the blood brain barrier (BBB); the effect of other drugs is to increase the flow across the BBB.

Clearly autism is a disease of the brain, but I presume inhibiting PAK outside the brain will reduce the concentration of PAK within the brain.  Does the CAPE in propolis cross the BBB?  Does it need to?

It may be that taking Ivermectin, with the contra-indicated drugs, but in a low dosage is in fact the optimal therapy, since it will then better cross the BBB.

I will start with a dose of New Zealand propolis and see if it has any effect; hopefully it comes from a good year.

If any readers have tried Ivermectin for autism, based on Dr Yu, Dr Klinghardt or anyone else’s “protocol”, I would love to hear from you.

P.S.

The really thorough review of possible PAK1 inhibitors, that I highlighted in the early post, is this one:-

Effective neurofibromatosis therapeutics blocking the oncogenic kinase PAK1