Repurposing Autism Drugs to treat Alzheimer’s – Bumetanide for APOE4 Alzheimer’s and Clemastine for all Alzheimer’s

The Gladstone Center for Translational Advancement was formed in 2017, and focuses on drug repositioning; repurposing already-approved drugs for new uses and clinical trials, to speed up (and lower the cost of) drug development.

 

Our neurologist reader Eszter commented recently on the overlap between experimental therapies for Alzheimer’s and those for autism. She was mentioning GHK-Cu, which is a naturally occurring peptide in our bodies that looks interesting in the research on both Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s.  There will be post on GHK-Cu, but this is a potential therapy that would require injections, so it has a big drawback

In the early days of this blog we looked at the repurposing of Alzheimer’s drugs like Memantine, Donepezil and Galantamine for some autism.

Roll forward a few years and we now have quite a handful of autism drugs in the portfolio. Today we look again at how some of these autism drugs can be repurposed for Alzheimer’s.

We have come full circle.

In a previous post we saw that Fenamate NSAIDs, like Ponstan, reduce the incidence of Alzheimer’s.  Only a low dose seems to be required for Alzheimer's and this drug is extremely cheap in countries like Greece. A low dose seems to have a broad effect on autism.  All in all very interesting, I believe.

We saw that Agmatine improves cognitive dysfunction and prevents cell death in a Streptozotocin-Induced Alzheimer rat model.

We saw that the ketone BHB inhibits inflammasome activation to attenuate Alzheimer's disease pathology.

I have mentioned the interest to repurpose Verapamil to treat Huntington’s disease, via its effect on autophagy, but there is also interest to use it in Alzheimer’s.

Repurposing verapamil for prevention of cognitive decline in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease

Today we will look at why Bumetanide and Clemastine may be beneficial in Alzheimer’s. 

 

A quick summary of Alzheimer’s Disease 

Alzheimer’s disease features prominently plaques (amyloid plaques) and fibers (tau tangles) that are visible within the brain.

It is thought that inhibiting the aggregation and accumulation of amyloid plaques and tau in the brain is the key to treating Alzheimer’s Disease.

We did see that that the red pigment in beetroot has been shown to block the formation of amyloid plaques and no prescription is required for that superfood.

In addition, we know that there is reduced glucose uptake across the blood brain barrier via the GLUT1 and GLUT3 transporters.  In effect the brain is left starving. There is also impaired insulin signalling within the brain, this led to the idea of intranasal insulin as a treatment.  The insulin dependent glucose transporter GLUT4 plays a central role in hippocampal memory processes, and reduced activation of this transporter may underpin the cognitive impairments seen in Alzheimer’s disease and more generally in those who develop insulin resistance. (more insulin inside the brain, please)

We also did look at the recently discovered lymphatic drainage system of the brain. It was seen that this waste clearing system is impaired in Alzheimer’s and perhaps some autism. This then takes us back to the autophagy process within the brain, where cellular waste is collected. It is thought that autophagy itself is impaired in autism. Collecting and disposing of brain garbage does not function as it should.

Over a decade or so, the brain gradually shrinks away and loses functions.  I think in reality Alzheimer’s initially develops slowly, years before diagnosis.

The currently prescribed drugs do not alter the course of the disease and often provide only minimal benefit. Donepezil increases acetylcholine concentrations at cholinergic synapses and upregulates nicotinic receptors. Memantine blocks NMDA receptors.  Much more appears to be possible.

This is an autism blog so let’s be aware of the research on the overlaps with Alzheimer’s. 

Alzheimer’s protein turns up as potential target for autism treatments 

Lowering the levels of a protein called tau, best known for its involvement in Alzheimer’s disease, eases autism-like traits in mice, according to a study published today in Neuron.

Tau regulates a gene called PTEN, according to a 2017 study4. PTEN accounts for 2 to 5 percent of autism cases and is known to modulate the PI3K pathway; without it, the pathway becomes overactive, in some cases leading to autism.

Mucke’s team found that knocking out PTEN in neurons blocks the effect of lowering tau on the mice’s behaviors. 

Proteomics of autism and Alzheimer’s mouse models reveal common alterations in mTOR signaling pathway

 Bumetanide for APOE4 Alzheimer’s?

Certain genes can increase the risk of developing dementia, including Alzheimer’s disease. One of the most significant genetic risk factors is a form of the apolipoprotein E gene called APOE4. About 25% of people carry one copy of APOE4, and 2 to 3% carry two copies. APOE4 is the strongest risk factor gene for Alzheimer’s disease, although inheriting APOE4 does not mean a person will definitely develop the disease.

The APOE gene comes in several different forms, or alleles. APOE3 is the most common and not believed to affect Alzheimer’s risk. APOE2 is relatively rare and may provide some protection against Alzheimer’s disease.

The reason APOE4 increases Alzheimer’s risk is not well understood. The APOE protein helps carry cholesterol and other types of fat in the bloodstream. Recent studies suggest that problems with brain cells’ ability to process fats, or lipids, may play a key role in Alzheimer’s and related diseases.

Regular readers of this blog will be familiar of the remarkable effects of statin drugs. So from the mention of cholesterol we take a brief diversion to see how people who start taking statins before older age get yet another benefit.

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5830056/#:~:text=Additionally%2C%20statins%20could%20reduce%20dementia,in%20Alzheimer's%20disease%20%5B70%5D.

 

"Additionally, statins could reduce dementia risk by directly affecting Alzheimer’s disease pathology. A study in transgenic mice models of Alzheimer’s disease found that atorvastatin reduced Aβ formation [69], and atorvastatin can attenuate some the damage from neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease [70].

Much of the evidence supporting statins in the prevention of dementia and AD are in persons exposed to statins at mid-life as opposed to late life. This suggests that statins benefits may be limited to the vascular prevention stage of AD and dementia. "

 

Back to Bumetanide.

 

The easy to read article:-

 

Can an Already Approved Drug Treat Alzheimer’s Disease?  

An Alternative Approach to Drug Discovery 

Developing new, targeted drugs for complex conditions like Alzheimer’s disease is a notoriously long and expensive process. In 2017, with the goal of bringing safe treatments to patients more quickly, Huang launched the Gladstone Center for Translational Advancement to repurpose FDA-approved drugs for new uses.

 

Huang’s approach centers around the idea that patients with Alzheimer’s disease may have different underlying causes of neurodegeneration, and therefore, the efficacy of specific treatments may differ among patients—a strategy called precision medicine. However, in the large clinical trials required for new drugs, it can be hard to pinpoint whether a drug is effective in only a subpopulation of the patients.

 

Therefore, the research team used a computational approach to identify unique gene expression profiles (or the level to which genes are turned on or off) associated with Alzheimer’s disease in brain tissues from specific subgroups of patients. They then screened a database of existing drugs to find the ones most likely to reverse the altered gene expression profiles in each subgroup.

 

In the new study, the researchers first analyzed a publicly available database of 213 brain samples from people with and without Alzheimer’s disease, including people with different versions of a gene called APOE, the major genetic risk factor for the disease.

The team identified nearly 2,000 altered gene expressions in the brains of people with Alzheimer’s disease. While roughly 6 percent of the altered genes were similar between people with different APOE versions, the vast majority of them were unique to people with specific combinations of the APOE3 or APOE4 versions, the latter conferring the highest genetic risk of Alzheimer’s disease.

The researchers next queried a database of more than 1,300 existing drugs to look for those able to change the altered gene expressions they had identified for subgroups of Alzheimer’s patients. They zeroed in on the top five drugs that might reverse the altered gene expressions found in Alzheimer’s patients carrying two copies of the high-risk APOE4 version.

 

“This unbiased approach allowed us to find which drugs might be able to flip the altered gene expression associated with APOE4-related Alzheimer’s disease back to the normal state,” says Alice Taubes, PhD, lead author of the study and former graduate student in Huang’s lab at Gladstone and co-mentored by Marina Sirota at UCSF. “It gave us important clues in solving the puzzle of which drugs could be effective against APOE4-related Alzheimer’s disease.”

 

After looking at the known mechanisms and previous data on the drugs in their top-five list, the researchers homed in on bumetanide, a diuretic that reduces extra fluid in the body caused by heart failure, liver disease, and kidney disease. Bumetanide is known to work by changing how cells absorb sodium and chloride—both important not only for maintaining appropriate levels of water throughout the body, but also for electrical signaling of neurons in the brain.

 

Huang and his team tested the effect of bumetanide on mice genetically engineered to have human APOE genes. Mice with two copies of the human APOE4 version typically develop learning and memory deficits around 15 months of age—the equivalent of roughly 60 years in humans. But when the researchers treated the mice with bumetanide, they no longer developed such deficits. In addition, the drug rescued alterations in electrical brain activity that can underlie these cognitive deficits.

 

The scientists also studied a second mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease, in which two copies of APOE4 coexist with amyloid plaques—a major pathological sign of Alzheimer’s disease in the brain. In these mice, bumetanide treatment decreased the number of amyloid plaques and restored normal brain activity.

 

Lastly, when the researchers studied the effect of the drug on human neurons derived from skin cells of Alzheimer’s patients carrying the APOE4 gene, they found that bumetanide reversed the gene expression changes associated with the disease.

 

… the researchers evaluated two large electronic health record databases—one from UCSF containing information on 1.3 million patients seen from 2012 through 2019, and another from the Mount Sinai Health System covering 3.9 million patients seen from 2003 through 2020. They narrowed in on more than 3,700 patients who had taken bumetanide and were over the age of 65, and compared them to patients of similar age and health who had taken different diuretic drugs. Strikingly, the patients who had taken bumetanide were 35 to 75 percent less likely to be diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease.

 

 

 

The full paper:-

 

It gets a bit heavy, so just skip through it.

 

Experimental and real-world evidence supporting the computational repurposing of bumetanide for APOE4-related Alzheimer’s disease

 

The evident genetic, pathological and clinical heterogeneity of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) poses challenges for traditional drug development. We conducted a computational drug-repurposing screen for drugs to treat apolipoprotein E4 (APOE4)-related AD. We first established APOE genotype-dependent transcriptomic signatures of AD by analyzing publicly available human brain databases. We then queried these signatures against the Connectivity Map database, which contains transcriptomic perturbations of more than 1,300 drugs, to identify those that best reverse APOE genotype-specific AD signatures. Bumetanide was identified as a top drug for APOE4-related AD. Treatment of APOE4-knock-in mice without or with amyloid β (Aβ) accumulation using bumetanide rescued electrophysiological, pathological or cognitive deficits. Single-nucleus RNA sequencing revealed transcriptomic reversal of AD signatures in specific cell types in these mice, a finding confirmed in APOE4 induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived neurons. In humans, bumetanide exposure was associated with a significantly lower AD prevalence in individuals over the age of 65 years in two electronic health record databases, suggesting the effectiveness of bumetanide in preventing AD. 

Bumetanide exposure is associated with a significantly lower AD prevalence in individuals over the age of 65. We hypothesized that, if bumetanide is efficacious against AD, we would observe a lower prevalence of AD diagnosis in individuals exposed to bumetanide than in a matched control cohort of individuals over the age of 65 years. To test this hypothesis in humans, we analyzed two independent EHR databases (Fig. 7a). One is an EHR database from the University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), which contains complete medical records for 1.3 million patients from outpatient, inpatient and emergency room encounters as part of clinical operations from June 2012 to November 2019. The UCSF EHR database was filtered using the medication order table for patients on the drug of interest, and we found 5,526 patients who had used bumetanide (other names, Bumex or Burinex). Among them, 1,850 patients (1,059 men (57.2%) and 791 women (42.8%)) were over the age of 65. The other EHR database was from the Mount Sinai Health

 

Fig. 7 | Bumetanide exposure is associated with a significantly lower AD prevalence in individuals over the age of 65 in two independent EHR databases.

Bootstrapped χ2 tests40 confirmed a significantly lower AD prevalence in bumetanideexposed individuals than that in non-bumetanide-exposed individuals in both EHR databases (Fig. 7b,c). Together, these data suggest that bumetanide may be effective in preventing AD in individuals over the age of 65 years, warranting further tests in prospective human clinical trials.

 

Discussion 

This study represents an attempt to apply a precision medicine approach to computational drug repurposing for AD in an APOE genotype-directed manner. The efficacy of a top predicted drug, bumetanide, for APOE4 AD was validated in vivo in both aged APOE4-KI (without Aβ accumulation) and J20/E4-KI (with Aβ accumulation) mouse models of AD for rescue of electrophysiological, pathological or behavioral deficits. Importantly, by leveraging real-world data, bumetanide exposure was associated with a significantly lower AD prevalence in individuals over the age of 65 years in two independent EHR databases, suggesting the potential effectiveness of bumetanide in preventing AD in humans.

Bumetanide exposure is associated with a significantly lower AD prevalence in individuals over the age of 65 in two independent EHR databases.

 

Clemastine for Alzheimer’s 

The research suggests multiple possible benefits from the use of the cheap antihistamine Clemastine in Alzheimer’s.

 

Clemastine Attenuates AD-like Pathology in an AD Model Mouse via Enhancing mTOR-Mediated Autophagy

Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder with limited available drugs for treatment. Enhancing autophagy attenuates AD pathology in various AD model mice. Thus, development of potential drugs enhancing autophagy may bring beneficial effects in AD therapy. Methods: In the present study, we showed clemastine, a first-generation histamine H1R antagonist and being originally marketed for the treatment of allergic rhinitis, ameliorates AD pathogenesis in APP/PS1 transgenic mice. Chronic treatment with clemastine orally reduced amyloid-β (Aβ) load, neuroinflammation and cognitive deficits of APP/PS1 transgenic mice as shown by immunohistochemistry and behavioral analysis. We further analyzed the mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of clemastine with using the combination of both in vivo and in vitro experiments. We observed that clemastine decreased Aβ generation via reducing the levels of BACE1, CTFs of APP. Clemastine enhanced autophagy concomitant with a suppression of mTOR signaling. Conclusion: Therefore, we propose that clemastine attenuates AD pathology via enhancing mTORmediated autophagy.

 

Clemastine Ameliorates Myelin Deficits via Preventing Senescence of Oligodendrocytes Precursor Cells in Alzheimer’s Disease Model Mouse 

Disrupted myelin and impaired myelin repair have been observed in the brains of patients and various mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Clemastine, an H1-antihistamine, shows the capability to induce oligodendrocyte precursor cell (OPC) differentiation and myelin formation under different neuropathological conditions featuring demyelination via the antagonism of M1 muscarinic receptor. In this study, we investigated if aged APPSwe/PS1dE9 mice, a model of AD, can benefit from chronic clemastine treatment. We found the treatment reduced brain amyloid-beta deposition and rescued the short-term memory deficit of the mice. The densities of OPCs, oligodendrocytes, and myelin were enhanced upon the treatment, whereas the levels of degraded MBP were reduced, a marker for degenerated myelin. In addition, we also suggest the role of clemastine in preventing OPCs from entering the state of cellular senescence, which was shown recently as an essential causal factor in AD pathogenesis. Thus, clemastine exhibits therapeutic potential in AD via preventing senescence of OPCs.

  

Reversing Alzheimer's disease dementia with clemastine, fingolimod, or rolipram, plus anti‐amyloid therapy

A few anti‐amyloid trials offer a slight possibility of preventing progression of cognitive loss, but none has reversed the process. A possible reason is that amyloid may be necessary but insufficient in the pathogenesis of AD, and other causal factors may need addressing in addition to amyloid. It is argued here that drugs addressing myelination and synaptogenesis are the optimum partners for anti‐amyloid drugs, since there is much evidence that early in the process that leads to AD, both neural circuits and synaptic activity are dysfunctional. Evidence to support this argument is presented. Evidence is also presented that clemastine, fingolimod, and rolipram, benefit both myelination and synaptogenesis. It is suggested that a regimen that includes one of them plus an anti‐amyloid drug, could reverse AD. 

Note that Rolipram is a selective PDE4 inhibitor that never made it to use in humans. Roflumilast is very similar and counts as an autism drug in this blog, alongside Pentoxifylline, which is a non-selective PDE inhibitor (if affects more than just PDE4). 

Conclusion

It looks like if you were an enlightened neurologist treating autism you would have the drugs needed to make a fair crack at treating, or preventing, Alzheimer’s.  Unfortunately, once they are established, you are not going to cure either disease; nonetheless, fully treating autism will carry forward the person further than their ABA therapist would ever have dreamed possible. Treating Alzheimer's successfully will depend on when you start, best to start as soon as the signs appear on an MRI or CT scan, not a few years later.

Prevention is better than cure; indeed an older person’s multipurpose Polypill looks to be in order. This could go beyond the usual cardiovascular concerns and include prevention/mitigation of dementia and diabetes (e.g. statin, low dose ponstan, verapamil and a mix of betanin, spermidine, agmatine with ALA or NAC)

Just because you might carry the APO4 gene does not mean you will develop Alzheimer’s, but it is a good reason to take steps to prevent it.

There is a long list of factors that increase the incidence/severity of autism, so there are is an equal number of steps that can be taken to reduce it.

The gene expression study showed that Bumetanide has wide ranging effects within the brain that counter the defects found in APO4 mice and humans who have developed Alzheimer’s.  This suggests that bumetanide’s effects go well beyond blocking the NKCC1 cotransporter.  This may explain why some bumetanide responders with autism have a paradoxical reaction to GABA agonists, like benzodiazepines, and some people do not. They are receiving different beneficial effects.

We will look at the anti-inflammatory benefits of bumetanide suggested in very recent Chinese research in the next post.  This might provide biomarkers for likely responders. 

You might have thought that clemastine would not be good for dementia, because it is anticholinergic, as are many antihistamines and even drugs commonly given to older people like Nexium. The neurotransmitter acetylcholine is good for cognition and it has been suggested that depleting it might lead to dementia.

It looks like our off-label MS drugs, clemastine, Ibudilast and Roflumilast are going to be good for dementia, not to forget our new reader Bob and his Pentoxifylline.

It is notable that Gladstone Center for Translational Advancement exists. There are clearly very many existing drugs that can be repurposed to treat all kinds of medical issues. I keep discovering more, which is good for me. Bob discovered Pentoxifylline, which is good for him and his patients.  Other people are free to make their own choices.

 

 

 

Bumetanide – Maths Test ✔✔✔ Clinical trial ✖✖✖

 

Memantine, Arbaclofen and now Bumetanide stumble in clinical trials

(also the less well known Balovaptan, which Roche dropped in 2020).

Place your bets on Suramin, anyone?

 

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose

The more things change, the more they stay the same

The first week of the school year brought two big surprises. 

Monty, aged 18 with autism, came top of the class in the math test.  This is a big win for bumetanide treatment, because 9 years ago Monty was effectively innumerate.  With a huge effort by his Assistant, he had learnt how to read and write, but even the most basic maths was beyond him.  That all changed in 2012 thanks to Professor Ben-Ari’s published research on Bumetanide in autism.

The sad news that week was that the Phase 3 clinical trial of Bumetanide for autism had been terminated early.  

Servier and Neurochlore announce the main results of the two phase 3 clinical studies assessing bumetanide in the treatment of Autism Spectrum Disorders in children and adolescents

Paris, 7 September 2021 – Servier and Neurochlore announce that no sign of effectiveness was observed in their two phase 3 clinical studies assessing bumetanide versus placebo in the treatment of Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) in children and adolescents. As a consequence, Servier and Neurochlore have decided, by mutual agreement, on an early termination of the two clinical studies in progress.

“The results of the phase 3 clinical studies are a major disappointment,” declares Professor Yehezkel Ben-Ari, President of Neurochlore. “Neurochlore’s teams will now analyze in detail the results of the studies and potentially explore new approaches based on artificial intelligence, which may enable us to identify sub-populations of people suffering from Autism Spectrum Disorders, for whom bumetanide could be effective.

 

Bumetanide also did not pass the NEMO clinical trial, as a treatment for neonatal seizures back in 2015.  This then made it a bit awkward to suggest that children with severe autism might lower their risk of developing epilepsy by taking bumetanide. Since this is a blog, I can speculate.  I would imagine children with severe autism, who are bumetanide-responders, and who are treated from early childhood through to adulthood with this drug, will have a low incidence of developing seizures. Seizures develop in about 30% of those with severe autism (DSM3 autism) and are the leading cause of their early death.  

 A Poorly Constructed Trial?

If such an effective therapy shows no benefit in a trial with 400 participants, something has gone seriously wrong.

I did ask one researcher friend, who just replied bluntly that the trial must have been poorly constructed.  I thought that was a bit brutal, even by my standards.

 

Be honest and admit your limitations

Monty, aged 18, came top in maths among 15 neurotypical 16 year olds.  But the 45 pupils in the year had been split into sub-groups. Two groups of 15 taking extended maths and one group of 15 taking core maths.  For some reason, because Monty has autism they put him in the lower group.

Not to worry, after his coming top in the math test, the school agreed that he can move to one of the upper groups taking the wider math curriculum.

So Monty is no maths genius, he came top among the weakest group of typical kids.  That is the whole truth, which is different to the partial truth.

In a similar way, autism researchers need to accept that there may never be a unifying therapy for autism, one that benefits everyone.

Concentrate on the responders to your treatment and forget the rest.  If you over-sell your therapy, you will fail.

As I have said in this blog many times, most people with an autism diagnosis are not bumetanide-responders.  However, a significant minority of those with severe autism are responders to bumetanide and they will experience a transformative benefit.

Going from a basket case to a Maths Whizz even?

 

Apply common sense and don’t outsource everything

In previous clinical trials of bumetanide, critics said it was all a placebo effect because the parents knew when they were giving bumetanide rather than a placebo.  The bumetanide pill causes the diuresis and placebo does not.

Why can you not use a different diuretic as the placebo?  Answer that one!

Many people using bumetanide give up because of the diuresis.  With schoolkids, the parents will receive complaints from school about excessive toilet breaks.  There will be wetting of trousers, car seats etc.  There will be anxiety caused by urgently needing a toilet, when none is nearby.

So you need a strategy in advance of how to deal with the diuresis.

I was told that people in the one trial centre I know about, were told nothing about the diuresis and how to cope with it.  I was even told the clinician basically told the parents that it was a stupid trial.  Not a good way to ensure compliance with the trial protocol.

So what happens? Some parents will decide to stop giving the diuretic drug, at least on school days.  Maybe they think that a “double-dose” at the weekend will make up the difference.

Clinical trials are a business these days and are outsourced to companies that do this and nothing else.  Don't outsource the most critical part of your work, or at least supervise it.

 

Why, oh why, oh why?

I was contacted by a mother from the southern hemisphere who managed to get Bumetanide prescribed by a pediatrician, based on Ben-Ari's earlier publications.  The diuresis is proving a problem for her family, but the positive effects are clear, for example her son now uses the word “Mummy”, but only while taking Bumetanide.  If you are a Mum/Mom, that is a big deal.  He also now responds to his own name and is "more present", the hallmark sign of a bumetanide-responder.

She saw me on YouTube and sent me a long email, including the “why, oh why, oh why?” are more people not giving bumetanide to their child with severe autism.  There is no good answer.

This Mum, now realizing she is not alone, plans to continue Bumetanide therapy.

Good for her!

 

Who dares wins, or at least stands a chance

I was recently sent an email version of an old post I had written on myelination. The sender had read it and convinced her doctor to prescribe her son Clemastine.

Her son has a single gene autism that is known to feature impaired myelination.

I pointed out that in my blog there are many references to therapies shown to benefit different aspects of the myelination process, clemastine is just one.  Some of these therapies are OTC, like alpha lipoic acid (ALA) and the N-Acetyl glucosamine (NAG), that Tyler brought to everyone’s attention.

Is the young man in question going to improve in function taking one or all of these 3 therapies? At least the mother in question is going to give them all a good shot.

Good for her.

 

Conclusion

I have received quite a few comments and messages about the Bumetanide trial failure.  Many are along the lines of “what do we do now?” and “how long will we have to wait?”

It looks like it pays to be an early adopter, rather than having faith that clinical trials will be structured and implemented properly. 

It has been suggested in the research that a large, 10g, daily dose of the OTC supplement TMG (trimethylglycine) may have an equivalent chloride lowering effect to bumetanide.  There is only anecdotal evidence to support this, but it seems to work for our reader Nancy's adult son - good job Nancy!  The other potentially chloride lowering drugs are more difficult to obtain than bumetanide itself.

There likely will never be a single unifying therapy for autism, just like there can never be for cancer.  In both conditions it is all about specific sub-types.

You would think that the previous trial failures in autism would have caused people to learn this important lesson.  

Hopefully, in the future Suramin clinical trials, where two competing companies are using the same therapy, it will not be assumed that everyone must be a responder for the therapy to be valid.  From the data, it does look like Suramin improves symptoms in a significant percentage of those with severe autism; but the same can also be said of Bumetanide, based on the earlier trials

In December Monty will commence his 10th year of Bumetanide therapy. We have made short breaks periodically to check it is still needed. For our case of autism, Professor Ben-Ari clearly got the science right and transformed a little boy's future life, something Ben-Ari can always be proud of. 

Game Changer or Fine Tuning? It depends on severity of Autism

 

There are so many possible autism interventions discussed in this blog, it clearly is not always easy to know their relative merit.

There are so many people now diagnosed with autism it is no longer such a meaningful term.  The most extreme autism I think I will have to start calling really severe autism.  A scale of 1 to 100 would be much more helpful than the current levels 1, 2 or 3. I suppose Elon Musk and Greta are level 1.

One reader did recent describe the effects of bumetanide in his child as being game changing.  I think it is an excellent description to use.  For our reader Roger, Leucovorin was a game changer.

Another reader wrote to me to give an update about his three year old

“After 3 months of bumetanide treatment I've seen improvement on his cognition, like, he is now able to finish an apple and take the end to the trash by himself or enter in his room, turn the lights on, take some toy, turn lights off and close the door or eat his lunch by himself. He is smarter now.”

This reader is well on his way to finding the additional elements for his son’s personalized polytherapy and the way he is going about it is likely to yield optimal results. Most of what you need is tucked away in this blog somewhere.  It is a case of who dares wins.

Using my scale of 1 to 100, with Elon and Greta in low single digits and many people referred to at the blog of the US National Council of Severe Autism mainly at 80-100, we can put interventions into a bit more perspective.

It is still far from perfect because most people with really severe autism reach a plateau in development at a very young age.  This matters because as a three year old they do not look/behave so differently to a typical child, but by the time they reach 18 years old, the difference is gigantic.

If you could delay the onset of this developmental plateau for a decade the result would be transformative.  Based on the longitudinal studies to adulthood, it looks like about 80% of severe autism reaches a plateau at the level of a 2-3 year old.  The other 20% continue to learn, but at a slower rate than typical children. 

In the case of the autism which is <10, like Greta and Elon, very small issues can still become very troubling.  There was inevitably bullying at school from mild to severe, there likely was (and still is) anxiety, perhaps an eating disorder, perhaps some self harming or even suicidal thoughts.

If you fine tune the brain a little to reduce anxiety and improve social/emotional responsiveness, you can trim someone’s score from a 15 to a 9 and make them feel much better.  Job done.

For someone with an IQ of 50 (i.e. severe intellectual disability), non-verbal, non-literate, who is sometimes aggressive and exhibits autistic behaviors, you are going to need much more than fine tuning, you need a game changer.  Then you can go on and fine tune things to give further incremental improvement.

One doctor reader did suggest to me that, in effect, five moderately effective interventions might equal one game changer.

In the case of autism that I deal with, the most important step was raising cognitive function, not treating what people consider to be autism.  I think that this applies to almost all people with a score 50 to 100.  Even if it was never actually diagnosed, the barrier to progress is low cognitive function and a severely reduced ability to learn and acquire new skills.  This has to be fixed and for many people the tools already exist.

 

Improving cognitive function

Game Changer

·      Bumetanide  (also Azosemide, KBr and, possibly, Betaine with the same effect of lowering chloride inside neurons)

Fine tuning

·      Atorvastatin, reducing cognitive inhibition

·      Micro-dose Clonazepam, shift E/I imbalance

·      Low-dose Roflumilast, raising IQ

 

Reducing autistic behaviors

Fine tuning

·      NAC

·      Sulforaphane

·      Verapamil

·      Oxytocin

·      BHB

·      Pentoxifylline

·      Agmatine

·      Clemastine

·      DMF

·      Leucovorin (Calcium Folinate)

 

Interventions with a slow course of action

Some interventions, for example pro-myelinating therapies (like clemastine and Tyler’s N-acetylglucosamine), or pro-autophagy therapies, may take a long time to show effect. I think you may need to first see very tangible results from other therapies, which are much easier to assess.

As Roger will want to point out, in the case of Cerebral Folate Deficiency Leucovorin was the game changer.

In the case of other metabolic autisms, a single therapy may also be the game changer, like the Greek boy for whom high dose biotin resolved his previously severe autism.

In the case of Fragile-X, there seem to be potential game changers galore.  The latest is plugging the leaky membrane in mitochondria that is allowing ATP to leak out, using a research drug dexpramipexole, or potentially the related and already approved variant Mirapex ER (pramipexole).  Mirapex is used to treat the symptoms of Parkinson Disease and Restless Legs Syndrome. 

If our occasional reader and bio-statistician Knut Wittkowski is correct, Mefenamic Acid (the NSAID Ponstan) could be a real game changer, if taken around 2-3 years of age.  He suggests this will block the progression to severe non-verbal autism. Knut has been upsetting YouTube with some of his interviews about Covid-19 and his deal with Q-Biomed to develop Mefenamic Acid fell through. You can buy Ponstan very cheaply, outside of the US, even as a pediatric syrup.

Hopefully, Dr Naviaux's Suramin will be a game changer for some.  More of that in the coming post on leaky ATP.

Conclusion

I am told where we live that Monty’s autism is “fixed”, or by one autism Grandad we know, “he’s 80% fixed”.

If you started life with (really) severe autism, even 80% fixed means you are still pretty autistic, much more so than Elon and Greta, but far less so than the now adult “children” over at the National Council for Severe Autism, who have really severe autism and often had a very early plateau in development.

Monty has finished his year-end exams.  Overall, the grades of his NT classmates are pretty terrible, maybe due to Covid disruptions.  I told Monty’s assistant that if he can come somewhere in the middle, without her doing the tests for him or having extra time, that is a great result, regardless of the grade itself.  In all his subjects he comes in the middle. In the English educational system, Monty is now a C student, maybe even with the odd B or D; so not something to boast about.  What really is amazing  is this person could not figure out  9 – 2 = 7,  at the age of 9 years old, prior to starting bumetanide and his Polypill therapy.  Now he is nearly 18 years old.

If you find that your young child is a genuine bumetanide responder, but later struggle to source it, take a close look at what untreated severe autism looks like by adulthood.  Then you may choose to redouble your efforts to get hold of your game changer. Some readers are getting it from Egypt, Pakistan, Nigeria, China, Austria and many from Mexico and Spain.  In Brazil you can buy it only in a compounding pharmacy. The lucky ones get it at their local pharmacy, which is what should be possible for everyone and one day that might even happen.

There are countless fine-tuning therapies that may be potentially effective in a particular person.  They are certainly worth having; you just have to look at what is available and cost effective.

There will soon be a post about leaky ATP in Fragile X and autism.

Two readers have highlighted the research suggesting that Betaine might have a similar effect to Bumetanide.  It does not block the NKCC1 transporter, but it may reduce the mRNA that produces them, so the net effect may potentially be similar.  At much lower doses, Betaine is a common autism supplement.  This will be covered in the next post.