UA-45667900-1
Showing posts with label Mental Retardation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mental Retardation. Show all posts

Monday 5 May 2014

Autism, Schizophrenia, MR, 5 Overlapping Genes and Epigenetic Dysfunction


In a recent post I raised the issue of maybe we should be looking at the schizophrenia research, given that the condition appears very closely related to ASD.  Then I got rather side tracked by MR (Mental Retardation), now known as Intellectual Disability, in polite society.  Since schizophrenia is adult-onset, I thought it might attract some serious research; indeed it does.  

It turns out there may have been more sense than you thought, in my making “connections” between autism, schizophrenia and MR.

A striking study has just been published from Trinity College, Dublin.  It draws these three conditions together using genes and makes a remarkable conclusion regarding epigenetics.  Epigenetic change has already been highlighted as a key process behind the development of autism. 

The full paper is not openly available, but below is the abstract and here is a press release from the University

De novo mutations in schizophrenia implicate chromatin remodelling and support agenetic overlap with autism and intellectual disability


An excellent lay person’s summary is available in this article:-

A Single Genetic Variation Is Shared By People With Schizophrenia ,Autism, And Intellectual Disability

 

Scientists believe some cases of schizophrenia are caused by gene mutations passed from parents to children with environmental factors exacerbating the effects of such mutations. Yet researchers also believe some cases of the mental disorder may be caused by de novo genetic mutations (DNMs). DNMs are new defects in genes that occur only in offspring — in such cases, neither parent possesses the same defects as the child. These mutations are simple copying errors caused during mechanical DNA replication. They occur infrequently in every human being during sperm and egg development, but typically they have no overall impact on human health.

However, when de novo mutations occur in a gene or genes indispensable for normal development they have devastating consequences. For this reason, McCombie and his colleagues, in an ongoing collaboration with Dr. Aiden Corvin of Trinity College, Dublin, hypothesized there may some special link between schizophrenia and DNMs.

For the current study, then, the team enlisted the help of 42 “trio” families in which the child, but neither parent, was diagnosed with schizophrenia and/or psychosis. They also enrolled 15 trio families with a history of psychosis. Then they set to work, searching for de novo mutations. What did they discover?

Among the 42 affected children in the study, they discovered de novo mutations in three genes: AUTS2, CDH8, and MECP2. (In prior genetic studies, mutations on these very same genes have been identified in people with autism.) Two other mutated genes found in the participants — HUWE1 and TRAPPC9 — have been similarly linked to people with intellectual disability.  Of these five "overlapping" genes, three — CHD8, MECP2 and HUWE1 — play a role in what scientists call the epigenetic regulation of transcription. That is, these three genes are involved in a complex molecular process that determines when and which genes are switched on or switched off.

"There's a growing awareness of the importance of epigenetic regulation during brain development, as well as in cognition in the mature brain," said Dr. Shane McCarthy, a CSHL research investigator and lead author of the new study. This regulation is the reason why the team’s discovery is so important — normal brain development depends on these genes. With this study, then, de novo mutations of these genes have been linked to not just schizophrenia but autism and intellectual disability as well.


Conclusion

This is actually all very important.  Epigenetics is a mechanism whereby the environment can affect your genes (flipping a specific gene, from on to off, or off to on).  Epigenetic changes can be inherited and so pass through the generations.  In theory, it can potentially be reversed.  Epigenetic change is not a good thing; but it seems that in people with autism, key genes have mutated that make them more prone to such epigenetic change.  So this might explain why people with autism are prone to so many other things (comorbidities) as well.  It might also explain why they are autistic in the first place; they were already at risk, but in addition they were more vulnerable to any kind of environmental insult.  The number of environmental insults is increasing in modern society and we are slowly accumulating some of the epigenetic flaws of our ancestors.  This might explain the increase in autism, particularly in modern societies, where environmental insults are more likely.

The other interesting point is that the five overlapping genes related to autism, MR and schizophrenia in the study are all new mutations; they were not inherited from the parents.  Many parents, and indeed pseudo-experts with their therapy “protocols”, often suggest that autism is nothing to do with genetics and they look for other factors to "blame", like heavy metals.  Parents clearly do not want to feel autism was their “fault”.  As this study shows, these five critical genetic causes are not inherited, they are just the result of imperfections in the copying process.  So in the case of these five genes, parents can accept the scientific evidence without any feeling of guilt. 

People with autism, but no MR, should probably count themselves very lucky indeed.




Monday 28 April 2014

Schizophrenia rather than Fragile-X and Retts Syndrome, as a Reference for ASD

You may, like me, have wondered why so much autism research seems to mention Fragile-X syndrome and Retts syndrome.  

Both Fragile-X and Retts are caused by the mutation of single genes, FMR1 and MECP2 respectively.  Autism can be caused by very many, seemingly unrelated things, both genetic and environmental.

When you look at it objectively, there is a much closer comparison for autism, it is schizophrenia.  

I know from the research I am reading that in fact autism and schizophrenia are intertwined and there is no boundary were one stops and the other starts.  Most likely some of the individual biological dysfunctions in autism are present in a greater/lesser degree in schizophrenia and vice versa.  This will be developed in later posts.

For those interested in learning more about schizophrenia here is a nice PowerPoint presentation.


Here are some excerpts:-

·        A biological disorder of the brain which causes disturbances in thinking, speech, perception of reality, emotion (mood), and behavior.

·        Approximately 1% of the population develops schizophrenia during their lifetime.

·        Although schizophrenia affects men and women with equal frequency, the disorder often appears early in men (usually late teens), than women (generally late twenties/early thirties).

The most ASD-like sub-type is called disorganized schizophrenia; and it principal features are:-

      Confusion and Incoherence

      Severe deterioration of adaptive behavior

     Lack of social skills
     Poor personal hygiene & self-care

      Behavior appears silly and/or child-like

      Highly  inappropriate emotional responses

It is not hard to see the potential overlap between ASD and Disorganized Schizophrenia.

We even have a researcher suggesting a very similar strategy for Schizophrenia, to that I am proposing/developing for autism.


The discovery of the pathophysiology(ies) for schizophrenia is necessary to direct rational treatment directions for this brain disorder. Firm knowledge about this illness is limited to areas of phenomenology, clinical electrophysiology, and genetic risk; some aspects of dopamine pharmacology, cognitive symptoms, and risk genes are known. Basic questions remain about diagnostic heterogeneity, tissue neurochemistry, and in vivo brain function. It is an illness ripe for molecular characterization using a rational approach with a confirmatory strategy; drug discovery based on knowledge is the only way to advance fully effective treatments. This paper reviews the status of general knowledge in this area and proposes an approach to discovery, including identifying brain regions of dysfunction and subsequent localized, hypothesis-driven molecular screening.


For psychiatrists, the main difference between autism and schizophrenia seems to be when is the onset of symptoms.  Autism strikes at the age of two or three, whereas schizophrenia occurs much older.  Whether in fact some of the same biological mechanisms might be at work does not seem to be relevant to psychiatrists.  Not surprisingly, they have not made much progress treating either condition.

In the days before the autism was so widely diagnosed, there were many more cases of childhood schizophrenia reported, now it is very rarely diagnosed condition, it became autism.

I did look for some statistics that included autism and schizophrenia, but those clever psychiatrists seem to have separated them, so autism is with developmental disabilities and schizophrenia is not.

But I did find some interesting statistics about developmental disabilities.

When you look at the US statistics (1997 – 2008), based on parent-reported developmental disabilities.






You can see that about 15% of kids have some kind of developmental disability.  Cases of autism increase from 0.2% to  0.7% over the ten years, but those with a learning disability is pretty flat at around 7% and mental retardation (MR) / intellectual disability is also pretty flat at 0.7%.

You also see that the incidence of seizures remains flat at about 0.7%.

According to the medical research, about 30% of people with autism will also have seizures; you would expect to see a seizure “epidemic’, if there had been an autism “epidemic”.  Whereas diagnosing autism is highly subjective, recognizing most types of seizure is not.

So clearly the numbers do not add up.  Perhaps now only 10% of people with autism have seizures?  Or perhaps only 30% of people with autism, really have it?   

The same is true with the incidence of mental retardation (intellectual disability) it remains flat at 0.7%.  According to the WHO, 50% of people with autism also have MR.  So, if there had been a big increase in new people with autism, you would expect an increase in MR.  If the level of MR remains flat it would seem that some people with MR have just been given an additional diagnosis of autism.  Either that, or the 50% figure is now much lower in the US, (which is what I expect is the reality).

With even the most basic figures not adding up, is it really surprising how little progress has been made in the hard part – actually finding treatments?

Autism has changed and now means entirely different things, to different people.  In particular, comparisons across countries are completely meaningless.


Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia has also changed and is now considered as a family or spectrum of disorders.

Like autism, nobody really knows what causes schizophrenia and most likely many things do, like autism.  There is no single gene, like with Fragile-X or Retts, and there is no cure.

When researchers compared the mixture of genetic dysfunctions in schizophrenia and autism, they found a clear overlap.  This is interesting and perhaps should not have come as a surprise.

In some ways Fragile-X and Retts are actually the opposite of autism.  For example in the case of Retts, the very important substance, Nerve Growth Factor (NGF), is almost at zero, whereas in autism levels tend to be elevated.

Just as we can learn from the comorbidities of autism, I think we can learn a thing or two from the existing research in Schizophrenia.  Indeed I already have.


MR

If anyone was seriously researching treating Mental Retardation (MR), in physically “normal” people, who have not suffered from a brain infection, toxic exposure, malnutrition or any kind of pre-natal or natal problem, we would have another great resource.  It would probably show that, in some cases, MR is caused by a partially-reversible imbalance in the actions of various neurotransmitters, ion channels, hormones etc.  Some of these imbalances will also exist in numerous cases of autism.

According to the well-known expert, Professor Howlin, only about 20% of people with ASD have an IQ in the normal range (i.e. above 70) and 50% have moderate or greater MR (i.e. IQ less than 50).  It would seem that the missing 30% must have mild MR (i.e. an IQ 50 to 70).

I suspect that the cognitive improvement found by treating some types of autism could be replicated in some cases of MR, without ASD.  If there were any clever therapies for treating MR, I would think they would likely be beneficial in autism.  In most countries, as many children have MR as have ASD, so it is strange nobody is looking how to treat it.  They assume the “defects” are hard-wired into the brain; I looks to me that some are not.


Clinical Trials

Even though ASD is a lifelong condition, nearly all the clinical trials are in children, and most often, in quite young children.  Assessing such people is doubly difficult.  Working with adults should be much easier and provide better quality data.

Other neurological conditions like schizophrenia and bi-polar disorder are regarded as adult conditions, so hopefully the quality of the research data is better.  We will see.

Plenty of adults have ASD and the ones with Asperger’s will have no difficulty articulating the effects of any intervention, so it is a pity they are rarely involved in research. 

   
Conclusion

On a happier note, I believe that if you can tune the autistic brain to its optimal performance, you will see a marked improvement in cognitive ability and, by implication, in measured IQ.  

I have no doubt that a well executed, intensive ABA program, over a few years, could also show a marked improvement in measured IQ, in many cases.  ABA is also a kind of retuning of the brain, but it has to be done right to be effective.

Biological tuning plus ABA should yield the best results.

As for schizophrenia, the biological "overlap" with autism does indeed exist. Two such areas are dysfunctional calcium channels and indeed the glutamate receptor mGluR5.  This will be developed later.