UA-45667900-1

Thursday 12 December 2019

ER Stress and Protein Misfolding in Autism (and IP3R again) and perhaps what to do about it - Activation of Sigma-1 Chaperone Activity by Afobazole?




Today’s post may require even regular readers to refresh their memories and look up the meaning of some words.

There really is a lot in this post. I had to read it twice.
As is often the case, this post started at the end with the therapy (a trial of Afobazole) and then I just looked at why it might be effective.

Activate Chaparones



Today's post is all about sigma-1 receptors and the many clever things that happen when they are activated.


Even the above diagram showing the effect of Sigma-1R is incomplete!


In the mouse study below, the Russian researchers looked at the effect of Afobazole treatment just over a few days; I think other effects might have developed if they had looked at an extended time period. They focus on Sigma1-R receptors modulating NMDA-based neurotransmission, but there seem to many possible further effects within the Endoplasmic Reticulum that relate specifically to autism. These researchers have published other studies using Afobazole, including recently one on Parkinson's disease. 




The multifactorial nature of ASD precludes the use of its modern genetic models in the study of pharmacologic effects exerted on entire symptomatic complex of autism although they could relate functional correction of ASD with a certain gene. In experiments, the models of idiopathic ASD are based on inbred mice selected by behavioral phenotype. BALB/c mice demonstrate pronounced autism-relevant behavioral phenotype characterized by low level of social relations, high levels of anxiety and aggression, increased brain weight, undeveloped corpus callosum, and lower serotonin concentration in the brain [7,12]. The emotional stress reaction (ESR) in these animals is associated with weaker binding capacity of the benzodiazepine site in GABAA receptor [6]. Transformation of ESR into the cell stress augments reception in the domain responsible for binding the endo- and exogenous ligands of sigma 1 receptor chaperon protein (Sigma1R) [1] responsible for adaptive reactions [8]. In addition, Sigma1R stimulate BDNF and NGF synthesis, promote the growth and arborization of nerve terminals, and control functional activity of potassium, calcium, and chloride ion channels and a variety of neuroreceptors [5,8,13]. Thus, this chaperon protein can be an important player in physiological and pharmacological regulation of ASD features.

Afobazole is a non-benzodiazepine anxiolytic drug that acts via activation of Sigma1R and interaction with MT1 and MT3 melatonin receptors and a regulatory site of MAO-A [4]. Clinical observations showed that Afobazole optimizes psychophysiological parameters in emotionally unstable persons without impairing attention, psychomotor responsiveness, and decision-making alertness in the model of operator work. The drug is characterized by mild activation effect and reduces anxiety, thus promoting adaptation to novel environment [2]. This work was designed to examine the effects of Afobazole on cognitive rigidity in BALB/c mice.

Evidently, enhanced motor activity of Afobazole treated BALB/c mice reflected the anxiolytic effect of this drug, which stimulated exploratory behavior aimed at solving the novel task. Thus, Afobazole improved adaptation to changing environment

The present study revealed the potency of Afobazole to promote retraining and reversal learning of BALB/c mice, which manifested in increased rate of adaptation to novel environment and more effective solution of the modified task. Afobazole interacts with Sigma1R receptors and induces their activation [1]. It cannot be excluded that the anxiolytic effect of Afobazole is accompanied by up-regulation of Sigma1R chaperone functions, because this drug normalizes the stress-induced down-regulation of reception in benzodiazepine site of GABAA receptor [6]. A large cluster of Sigma1R receptor was revealed in the hippocampus that plays a key role in adaptive behavior related to building of spatial cognitive maps, learning, and memory. Sigma1R receptors modulate NMDA-based neurotransmission; they can enhance spontaneous release of glutamate in the hippocampus, potentiate glutamate-induced release of neurotrophic factor, and participate in synaptic plasticity [8]. However, Sigma1R receptors regulate cognitive processes under disturbed neurotransmitter balance only. All these data agree with our previous findings and with the current views on the mechanism of Afobazole action [1,4,5]. Thus, the mode of action and pharmacological effects of Afobazole are promising features, which justify the hopes to use it as an effective remedy to treat cognitive rigidity in ASD patients


More on sigma-1 and NMDA receptors:-

NMDA Receptors Are Upregulated and Trafficked to the Plasma Membrane after Sigma-1 Receptor Activation in the Rat Hippocampus

Sigma-1 receptors (σ-1Rs) are endoplasmic reticulum resident chaperone proteins implicated in many physiological and pathological processes in the CNS. A striking feature of σ-1Rs is their ability to interact and modulate a large number of voltage- and ligand-gated ion channels at the plasma membrane. We have reported previously that agonists for σ-1Rs potentiate NMDA receptor (NMDAR) currents, although the mechanism by which this occurs is still unclear. In this study, we show that in vivo administration of the selective σ-1R agonists (+)-SKF 10,047 [2S-(2α,6α,11R*]-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexahydro-6,11-dimethyl-3-(2-propenyl)-2,6-methano-3-benzazocin-8-ol hydrochloride (N-allylnormetazocine) hydrochloride], PRE-084 (2-morpholin-4-ylethyl 1-phenylcyclohexane-1-carboxylate hydrochloride), and (+)-pentazocine increases the expression of GluN2A and GluN2B subunits, as well as postsynaptic density protein 95 in the rat hippocampus. We also demonstrate that σ-1R activation leads to an increased interaction between GluN2 subunits and σ-1Rs and mediates trafficking of NMDARs to the cell surface. These results suggest that σ-1R may play an important role in NMDAR-mediated functions, such as learning and memory. It also opens new avenues for additional studies into a multitude of pathological conditions in which NMDARs are involved, including schizophrenia, dementia, and stroke.


Afobazole is primarily used to treat mild anxiety.  Indeed it appears that sigma-1 receptor activation ameliorates anxiety through NR2A-CREB-BDNF signalling.  NR2A is a sub-unit of NMDA receptors.

Sigma-1 receptor activation ameliorates anxiety-like behavior through NR2A-CREB-BDNF signaling pathway in a rat model submitted to single-prolonged stress.

It does seem that activating the sigma-1 receptor might be another of those nexuses in treatment, where different dysfunctions in autism might well respond to the same therapy.  Recall how many functions of the Endoplasmic Reticulum are impaired in autism, such as the all important calcium homeostasis. 

It also might account for some of the people with autism that respond to Memantine/Nameda and Donepezil. My old post on IP3R and the endoplasmic reticulum, looked at the interesting hypothesis proposed by Gargus.

Is dysregulated IP3R calcium signaling a nexus where genes altered in ASD converge to exert their deleterious effect?









Components of a typical animal cell:

1.                 Nucleolus
2.                 Nucleus
3.                 Ribosome (little dots)
4.                Vesicle
5.                Rough endoplasmic reticulum
6.                Golgi apparatus (or "Golgi body")
7.                Cytoskeleton
8.               Smooth endoplasmic reticulum
9.               Mitochondrion
10.            Vacuole
11.            Cytosol (fluid that contains organelles)
12.             Lysosome
13.             Centrosome
14.             Cell membrane



Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) and ER Stress
The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is the cellular organelle in which protein folding, calcium homeostasis, and lipid biosynthesis occur. Stimuli such as oxidative stress, ischemic insult, disturbances in calcium homeostasis, and enhanced expression of normal and/or folding-defective proteins lead to the accumulation of unfolded proteins, a condition referred to as ER stress.

Prolonged ER stress typically results in cell death by apoptosis; an answer to “where did all the Purkinje cells go?”, in people with severe autism, perhaps.  

ER stress is known to affect "neurite outgrowth", which is all the bits like dendrites. Purkinje cells have the most dendrites.  Loss of Purkinje cells affects your motor skills and the Pukinje cell layer is found to be severely depleted in people with autism. Many people with autism, even some Aspies, have poor motor skills. 

Research shows that exercise suppresses Purkinje cell losss and that the ones remaining in autistic brains are likley dysfunctional. When synaptic pruning works correctly each Purkinje cell in an adult receives only one climbing fiber input, in ASD models there is an abundance of climbing fibers. It does seem that with enough practice you may overcome poor motor skills in autism.

Interestingly, in the research we see that both Atorvastatin and Rosuvastatin enhance neurite outgrowth. Atorvastatin has long been part of my PolyPill for severe autism.

For effective synaptic pruning you need microglia that are not activated, so shift them back to M0.  This is another part of my PolyPill.

Protein folding is the physical process by which a protein chain acquires its native 3-dimensional structure, a conformation that is usually biologically functional.



Molecular chaperones are a class of proteins that aid in the correct folding of other proteins, sigma-1 is one example.

A protein is considered to be misfolded if it cannot achieve its normal native state and function.

Incorrect protein folding is a common feature of neurodegenerative disease.

An emerging approach is to use pharmaceutical chaperones to fold mutated proteins to render them functional.



As will be seen in the research, ER stress is a feature of severe autism and indeed schizophrenia.

The result is that perfect genes do not produce perfect functional proteins.  They produce misfolded perfect proteins that cannot function.

Misfolded proteins can interact with one another and form structured aggregates and gain toxicity through intermolecular interactions, but that would lead to a degenerative brain disease (Alzheimer’s, Huntington’s, Parkinson’s etc).  So, the misfolding in autism, if present, it not catastrophic (except perhaps for those Purkinje cells); but a nice folded shirt does give a better result than a crumpled one. Better keep your proteins neatly folded. 



Is there ER Stress in Autism?

The short answer is yes, at least in the kind of autism that leads to young human brains  being donated to medical research.  

Autism research based on human brain tissue is biased towards severe autism (they can die in childhood), whereas many/most clinical trials are now biased towards mild autism (having participants who are fully verbal and cooperative makes life easier for researchers, but their young brains do not get donated to medical research).   

Altered Expression of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Related Genes in the Middle Frontal Cortex of Subjects with Autism Spectrum Disorder

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is an important organelle responsible for the folding and sorting of proteins. Disturbances in ER homeostasis can trigger a cellular response known as the unfolded protein response, leading to accumulation of unfolded or misfolded proteins in the ER lumen called ER stress. A number of recent studies suggest that mutations in autism spectrum disorder (ASD)-susceptible synaptic genes induce ER stress. However, it is not known whether ER stress-related genes are altered in the brain of ASD subjects. In the present study, we investigated the mRNA expression of ER stress-related genes (ATF4, ATF6, PERK, XBP1, sXBP1, CHOP, and IRE1) in the postmortem middle frontal gyrus of ASD and control subjects. RT-PCR analysis showed significant increases in the mRNA levels of ATF4, ATF6, PERK, XBP1, CHOP, and IRE1 in the middle frontal gyrus of ASD subjects. In addition, we found a significant positive association of mRNA levels of ER stress genes with the diagnostic score for stereotyped behavior in ASD subjects. These results, for the first time, provide the evidence of the dysregulation of ER stress genes in the brain of subjects with ASD.





Increase in mRNA levels of endoplasmic reticulum stress genes in the middle frontal gyrus of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) subjects. mRNA levels of endoplasmic reticulum stress genes were determined by qRT-PCR in the middle frontal gyrus of ASD (n = 13) and control (n = 12) subjects. The Ct values were normalized to the mean of 18S and β-actin. a Activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4). b Activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6). c Protein kinase-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK). d X-box protein 1 (XBP1). e Spliced X-box protein 1 (sXBP1). f CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein homologous protein (CHOP). g Inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.0001 vs. controls.

We found significant increases in ATF4, ATF6, PERK, XBP1, CHOP, and IRE1 mRNA levels in the middle frontal gyrus of ASD subjects. Among these molecules, CHOP is known to interact with the heterodimeric receptors GABAB1aR/GABAB2R and inhibits the formation of heterodimeric complexes resulting in the intracellular accumulation and reduced cell surface expression of receptors [34]. Interestingly, decreased levels of GABAB1R and GABAB2R have been found in the brain of ASD subjects [35]. What are the downstream mechanism mediating ER stress-induced changes in central nervous system function? One potential mechanism is inflammation. Accumulating evidence suggest that pathways activated by the ER stress response induce inflammation. When activated, all three sensors of the UPR, PERK, IRE1, and ATF6, participate in upregulating inflammatory processes. It is known that PERK and IRE1 activation can interfere with NFκB inhibitory signals, thereby promoting a proinflammatory response [36]. In addition, CHOP has been shown to induce the expression of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-23 [37]. Moreover, ER stress activates NLRP3 inflammasomes via thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP), leading to increases in proinflammatory cytokine levels [38,39]. In this regard, our earlier studies using the same tissue samples of the present study found increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IFN-γ in the middle frontal gyrus of ASD subjects [30].
Also, chronic ER stress is known to induce cellular apoptosis through a number of pathways including CHOP, calcium signaling, and microRNAs [40]. Activation of PERK triggers a series of transcriptional responses mediated by ATF4 and CHOP, which in turn inhibit the expression of anti-apoptotic protein Bcl2 and induce pro-apoptotic proteins such as Bcl2-interacting mediator of cell death (BIM) and p53 upregulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA) [40]. The induction of pro-apoptotic signaling pathway results in the activation of BAX- and BAK-dependent apoptosis at the mitochondria and the activation of the caspase cascade [41]. Interestingly, decrease in Bcl2, but increase in p53 protein levels have been reported in the frontal cortex of ASD subjects [42].
We found that mRNA levels of ER stress genes are positively associated with the stereotyped behavior domain of the ADI-R. It has been shown that autism-associated mutations in NLGN3, which is known to induce ER stress, also increase stereotyped behavior in mice [43]. Similarly, mice lacking CNTNAP2 showed increased repetitive behaviors such as grooming and digging [44], further suggesting that abnormalities in ASD candidate genes implicated in ER stress induce stereotyped behavior in rodents. The present data was collected in a relatively small number of study subjects, which needs further investigation using larger samples before a conclusion can be drawn. Also, the change in gene expression as part of ER stress axis in ASD could be associated with other priming factors functional on different coordinates of this complex neurodevelopmental disorder. Additional studies are warranted to analyze the ER stress-inducing factors with direct relationship to the pathophysiological changes associated with ASD. To further establish a definitive role of ER stress in ASD pathophysiology, the following questions still need to be addressed: (1) Is ER stress in ASD of neurodevelopmental origin? (2) Are there factors other than mutant synaptic proteins that can trigger ER stress leading to ASD phenotype? (3) Is inflammation triggering ER stress or is ER stress triggering inflammation leading to ASD phenotype? (4) Does ER stress induce changes in neural connectivity between key brain regions implicated in ASD pathophysiology? Future studies addressing the above questions might lead to a better understanding of the pathophysiology and provide new avenues of treatment of this disorder.


Cellular stress and apoptosis contribute to the pathogenesis ofautism spectrum disorder

 

Lay Summary

Autism results in significant morbidity and mortality in children. The functional and molecular changes in the autistic brains are unclear. The present study utilized autistic brain tissues from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development's Brain Tissue Bank for the analysis of cellular and molecular changes in autistic brains. Three key brain regions, the hippocampus, the cerebellum, and the frontal cortex, in six cases of autistic brains and six cases of non‐autistic brains from 6 to 16 years old deceased children, were analyzed. The current study investigated the possible roles of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, oxidative stress, and apoptosis as molecular mechanisms underlying autism. The activation of three signals of ER stress (protein kinase R‐like endoplasmic reticulum kinase, activating transcription factor 6, inositol‐requiring enzyme 1 alpha) varies in different regions. The occurrence of ER stress leads to apoptosis in autistic brains. ER stress may result from oxidative stress because of elevated levels of the oxidative stress markers: 4‐Hydroxynonenal and nitrotyrosine‐modified proteins in autistic brains. These findings suggest that cellular stress and apoptosis may contribute to the autistic phenotype. Pharmaceuticals and/or dietary supplements, which can alleviate ER stress, oxidative stress and apoptosis, may be effective in ameliorating adverse phenotypes associated with autism.

 


Figure 1. Immunoblot analysis of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress signals in the autistic cerebellum. Immunoblot analysis of the cerebellum homogenate was performed using p-IRE1a, p-PERK, and total ATF6 antibodies.

  

In summary, we showed the elevation of ER stress signals, oxidative stress, and apoptosis in three regions of autistic brains. Based on these findings, we reason that increased cellular stress and apoptosis in the autistic brain may be associated with the pathogenesis of autism. Because autism is affected by multiple genetic and environmental factors that are case-specific and there are inherent limitations in the postmortem brain, the present observations will need further confirmation in future studies. Further research with larger sample sizes is needed to investigate the association of cellular stress and apoptotic events with the severity and clinical phenotypes of autism.

 



Chaperone Sigma1R mediates the neuroprotective action of afobazole in the 6-OHDA model of Parkinson’s disease

Abstract

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease with limited treatment options. Therefore, the identification of therapeutic targets is urgently needed. Previous studies have shown that the ligand activation of the sigma-1 chaperone (Sigma1R) promotes neuroprotection. The multitarget drug afobazole (5-ethoxy-2-[2-(morpholino)-ethylthio]benzimidazole dihydrochloride) was shown to interact with Sigma1Rs and prevent decreases in striatal dopamine in the 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-induced parkinsonism model. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the role of Sigma1Rs in afobazole pharmacological activity. Using ICR mice we found that administration of afobazole (2.5 mg/kg, i.p.) or selective agonist of Sigma1R PRE-084 (1.0 mg/kg, i.p.) over 14 days normalizes motor disfunction and prevents decreases in dopamine in the 6-OHDA-lesioned striatum. Afobazole administration also prevents the loss of TH + neurons in the substantia nigra. The pre-administration of selective Sigma1R antagonist BD-1047 (3.0 mg/kg, i.p.) abolishes the activity of either afobazole or PRE-084, as determined using the rotarod test and the analysis of striatal dopamine content. The current study demonstrates the contribution of Sigma1Rs in the neuroprotective effect of afobazole in the 6-OHDA model of Parkinson’s disease and defines the therapeutic perspective of Sigma1R agonists in the clinic.                                                                                                                                                

Sigma-1 (σ1) Receptor in Memory and Neurodegenerative Diseases

The sigma-1 (σ1) receptor has been associated with regulation of intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis, several cellular signaling pathways, and inter-organelle communication, in part through its chaperone activity. In vivo, agonists of the σ1 receptor enhance brain plasticity, with particularly well-described impact on learning and memory. Under pathological conditions, σ1 receptor agonists can induce cytoprotective responses. These protective responses comprise various complementary pathways that appear to be differentially engaged according to pathological mechanism. Recent studies have highlighted the efficacy of drugs that act through the σ1 receptor to mitigate symptoms associated with neurodegenerative disorders with distinct mechanisms of pathogenesis. Here, we will review genetic and pharmacological evidence of σ1 receptor engagement in learning and memory disorders, cognitive impairment, and neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, and Huntington’s disease.

Crosstalk between endoplasmic reticulum stress and oxidative stress in schizophrenia: The dawn of new therapeutic approaches

Highlights

The complete understanding of the pathways and the point of convergence of ER and oxidative stress in schizophrenia is still quite fragmentary.

Neuronal migration along with altered secretion of neurotrophins modulates neuronal circuits and synaptic function during schizophrenia.

Chemical chaperones including Sigma-1 receptor agonists may prevent stress-induced protein misfolding associated with schizophrenia.

ER-stress inhibitors, sigma-1 receptor agonists and gene therapies holds a strong therapeutic potential against schizophrenia.
Disruption of oxidant/anti-oxidant ratio as well as endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress are thought to be involved in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. These stresses can lead to impairments in brain functions progressively leading to neuronal inflammation followed by neuronal cell death. Moreover, the cellular stresses are interlinked leading us to the conclusion that protein misfolding, oxidative stress and apoptosis are intricately intertwined events requiring further research into their mechanistic and physiological pathways. These pathways can be targeted by using different therapeutic interventions like anti-oxidants, sigma-1 receptor agonists and gene therapy to treat the neurodegenerative course of schizophrenia. We have also put empahsis on use of synthetic and natural ER stress inhibitors like 4-phenylbutyrate or salubrinal for the treatment of this disorder. This would provide an opportunity to create new therapeutic benchmarks in the field of neuropsychiatric disorders like schizophrenia, dissociative identity disorder and obsessive compulsive disorder.
                                                                                      

Targeting ligand-operated chaperone sigma-1 receptors in the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders

Current conventional therapeutic drugs for the treatment of psychiatric or neurodegenerative disorders have certain limitations of use. Psychotherapeutic drugs such as typical and atypical antipsychotics, tricyclic antidepressants, and selective monoamine reuptake inhibitors, aim to normalize the hyper- or hypo-neurotransmission of monoaminergic systems. Despite their great contribution to the outcomes of psychiatric patients, these agents often exert severe side effects and require chronic treatments to promote amelioration of symptoms. Furthermore, drugs available for the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders are severely limited.

Areas covered

This review discusses recent evidence that has shed light on sigma-1 receptor ligands, which may serve as a new class of antidepressants or neuroprotective agents. Sigma-1 receptors are novel ligand-operated molecular chaperones regulating a variety of signal transduction, ER stress, cellular redox, cellular survival, and synaptogenesis. Selective sigma-1 receptor ligands exert rapid antidepressant-like, anxiolytic, antinociceptive and robust neuroprotective actions in preclinical studies. The review also looks at recent studies which suggest that reactive oxygen species might play a crucial role as signal integrators at the downstream of Sig-1Rs

Expert opinion

The significant advances in sigma receptor research in the last decade have begun to elucidate the intracellular signal cascades upstream and downstream of sigma-1 receptors. The novel ligand-operated properties of the sigma-1 receptor chaperone may enable a variety of interventions by which stress-related cellular systems are pharmacologically controlled.

Sigma-1 receptor ligands
Clinically used drugs:
·         Afobazole (5-ethoxy-2-[2-(morpholino)-ethylthio]benzimidazole dihydrochloride): Anxiolytic drug
·         Carbetapentane: Cough suppressant
·         Dextromethorphan (DM): Antitussive drug; DM-quinidine (Q) therapy is effective in reducing pseudobulbar affect in ALS and multiple sclerosis
·         DonepezilSigma-1 agonist; acetylcholine esterase inhibitor used in Alzheimer’s disease
·         Fluvoxamine: Clinically used SSRI; Sig-1R agonist
·         Sertraline: Clinically used SSRI with a putative Sig-1R antagonist property
·         Haloperidol: Clinically used antipsychotic; potent, but non selective sigma antagonist
·         Haloperidol-metabolite II (reduced HP, 4-(4-chlorophenyl)-alpha-(4-fluorophenyl)-4-hydroxy-1-piperidinebutanol): In contrast to haloperidol, having higher selectivity to Sig-1Rs
·         MemantineA novel Alzheimer’s disease medication blocking NMDA glutamate receptors
·         Zonisamide: Anti-Parkinson drug approved in Japan

Involvement of endoplasmic reticulum stress and neurite outgrowth in the model mice of autism spectrum disorder



Implication of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Autism Spectrum Disorder

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is categorized as a neurodevelopmental disorder according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Disorders, Fifth Edition and is defined as a congenital impairment of the central nervous system. ASD may be caused by a chromosomal abnormality or gene mutation. However, these etiologies are insufficient to account for the pathogenesis of ASD. Therefore, we propose that the etiology and pathogenesis of ASD are related to the stress of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). ER stress, induced by valproic acid, increased in ASD mouse model, characterized by an unfolded protein response that is activated by this stress. The inhibition of neurite outgrowth and expression of synaptic factors are observed in ASD. Similarly, ER stress suppresses the neurite outgrowth and expression of synaptic factors. Additionally, hyperplasia of the brain is observed in patients with ASD. ER stress also enhances neuronal differentiation. Synaptic factors, such as cell adhesion molecule and shank, play important roles in the formation of neural circuits. Thus, ER stress is associated with the abnormalities of neuronal differentiation, neurite outgrowth, and synaptic protein expression. ER stress elevates the expression of the ubiquitin-protein ligase HRD1 for the degradation of unfolded proteins. HRD1 expression significantly increased in the middle frontal cortex in the postmortem of patients with ASD. Moreover, HRD1 silencing improved the abnormalities induced by ER stress. Because other ubiquitin ligases are related with neurite outgrowth, ER stress may be related to the pathogenesis of neuronal developmental diseases via abnormalities of neuronal differentiation or maturation.


Sigma-1 receptor: The novel intracellular target of neuropsychotherapeutic drugs

The sigma-1 receptor localized at the ER modulates via its chaperone activity inter-organelle communications. Sigma-1 receptors thus regulate a variety of cellular events, such as neuronal differentiation, cellular survival, and bioenergetics. By numerous animal studies, these actions of the sigma-1 receptors have been linked to the pathophysiology of certain human diseases such as depression, ischemia, drug abuse, pain, and cancer. Considering the current pharmacotherapy of neuropsychiatric diseases that largely depends on drugs developed based on the monoamine theory, the sigma-1 receptor is expected to serve as a molecule, which provides a novel target of “post-monoamine” drugs, thus bringing a new approach for treatment of patients suffering from neuropsychiatric diseases.

                                                                                                                       


Fig. 1. Molecular functions of the sigma-1 receptor. The sigma-1 receptor possesses two transmembrane domains and mainly localize at the ER membrane. Sigma-1 receptors are clustered at the mitochondria-associated ER membrane (MAM) and ER membranes juxtaposing postsynaptic density of specific types of neurons. The ER lumenal domain of the sigma-1 receptor exerts chaperone activities by which ER membrane proteins are stabilized. The figure depicts the recently reported actions of the sigma-1 receptors including: 1) Sigma-1 receptors associating with BiP stabilizes IP3 receptors type-3 (IP3R) at the MAM, leading to regulation of Ca2+ influx into mitochondria and following ATP production; 2) Sigma-1 receptors stabilize the ER stress sensor IRE1 at the MAM in an ROS-dependent manner, leading to prolongation of the IRE1-XBP1 cell survival signal; 3) Sigma-1 receptors suppress generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and following activation of the NFkB signaling (How the sigma-1 receptor regulates ROS generation is unknown); 4) Sterols such as 25-hydroxycholesterol promote the association of sigma-1 receptors with Insig-1 [Collaborating with Insig-1, sigma-1 receptors regulate ER-associated degradation (ERAD) of HMG-CoA reductase and galactosylceramide synthase at the ER]; 5) Sigma-1 receptors regulate the trafficking of potassium channel subunits from the ER to the plasma membrane or processing/secretion of brain-derived trophic factor (BDNF). Sigma-1 receptors likely associate with potassium channel subunits or pro-BDNF at the ER. In spinal neurons, sigma-1 receptors, which colocalize with a K channel subunit are clustered at the ER membrane apposing postsynaptic densities (PSD). How the sigma-1 receptor regulates processing/secretion of BDNF is unknown.  (in the earlier part of this post the mechanism that increases BDNF is explained, if you activate sigma-1R you inevitably will increase BDNF)



Conclusion

In our simplified view of autism, aimed at actually treating it, we should have a list of stresses and what to do about them:-

·        Oxidative stress
·        Nitrosative stress
·        Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) stress

Reducing oxidative stress has multiple biological and behavioral effects; the overall effect is generally positive.

Reducing endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, if present, does look a good idea.  It will have numerous effects; it should even reduce oxidative stress. The sigma-1 chaperone looks like it will have many effects that, on balance, should be positive, but undoubtedly may upset something and produce an overall negative effect in some people – it is inevitable.  I hope the effect on NMDA receptors does not cause a problem where an E/I (excitatory/inhibitory) imbalance is already being treated.

A highly selective sigma-1R agonist, one that does not affect any other receptors, does not exist.

Many psychiatric drugs like antidepressants do affect sigma-1R, but they are not suitable for long term use because of side effects, tolerance, addiction etc.

Afobazole is interesting because clinical trials have shown it to be well tolerated, non-addictive and reasonably effective for the treatment of anxiety.  Afobazole also affects the melatonin receptor MT1, it is not directly sedating but might affect some types of sleep abnormality. 

Afobazole is only researched in Russia, but findings are shared internationally, for example at this conference




The drug was developed, and is currently researched, by the “Research Zakusov Institute of Pharmacology” in Moscow. They recently also published a paper on the use of Afobazole in Parkinson’s disease.  In the Parkinson’s paper (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-53413-w) the researchers argue the role of the drug is in targeting ER stress, protein misfolding, IP3R etc.  The very things I am suggesting may be relevant to autism in today’s post.

Another interesting drug from the former USSR, though actually from Latvia (now in the European Union) is Mildronate.  I did suggest a long time ago, based on the research studies, that this might be effective to treat people with a lack of the Mitochondrial Complex 1.

I think mitochondrial disease is likely over diagnosed by MAPS-type doctors, but it is a genuine cause/contributing factor to some people’s autism.

So many people are using Mildronate to boost sporting performance and some for academic performance, it is now widely available from the same vendors /platforms selling Afobazole. (eBay, Amazon etc)

The underlying message is that when considering repurposing safe old drugs to treat neurological conditions, consider all of them, including Japanese, Russian and indeed Latvian.

Many interesting novel substances are mentioned in this blog, like Basmisanil  a highly selective negative allosteric modulator of α5 subunit-containing GABAA receptors for the treatment of cognitive impairment specifically associated with Down syndrome.  The problem with such novel substances is that they will be ultra expensive and often they fail in their clinical trials and are never commercialized.  Roche cancelled Basmisanil because it failed in the Down Syndrome trial.  Tuning down the response from GABAa receptors containing the α5 subunit may very well be an effective way to improve cognitive function in some people, but the failure of this trial likely means no new substances will be developed.

While it is okay to write about new drugs in development, the real interest is in applying what can be used today. All four of the following need to be satisfied:

1.     Safe (no/minimal side effects, no tolerance, no addiction, interactions)
2.     Affordable
3.     Available
4.     Effective

Some drugs, not commonly used in Western countries, likely do tick the first 3 points, whether effective in autism depends on the individual sub-type.  Many do look interesting - from Ibudilast (Japan), to Mildronate (Latvia) for Complex 1 mitochondrial disease and perhaps Afobazole (Russia) for some schizophrenia/autism.

Afobazole is a cheap over-the-counter anxiety treatment in Russia.  It is apparently “effective” in the BALB/c mouse model, that may be relevant to autism. BALB/c mice show low sociability, relatively high levels of anxiety and aggressive behaviors, large brain size, underdevelopment of the corpus callosum, and low levels of brain serotonin.

Is Afobazole the answer to ER stress in autism?  If not, then what might be?  The schizophrenia research suggests 4-phenylbutyrate, salubrinal, cordycepin, taurosodeoxycholic acid.  Cordycepin comes from a mushroom that I recall one of our Aspie readers favours.   

This post could go on forever; I think I have made my point, but a little more:-

The lipophilic 4-phenylbutyric acid derivative prevents aggregation and retention of misfolded proteins 

Chemical chaperones prevent protein aggregation. However, the use of chemical chaperones as drugs against diseases due to protein aggregation is limited by the very high active concentrations (mM range) required for mediating their effect. One of the most common chemical chaperones is 4-phenylbutyric acid (4-PBA). Despite its non-favorable pharmacokinetic properties, 4-PBA was approved as a drug to treat ornithine cycle diseases. Here we report that 2-isopropyl-4-phenylbutanoic acid (compound 5) was (2-10 fold) more effective than 4- PBA in several in vitro models of protein aggregation. Importantly, compound 5 reduced the secretion rate of autism-linked Arg451Cys Neuroligin3 (R451C NLGN3).


Protein misfolding, detectable in blood samples, predicts Alzheimer's Disease up to 14 years before onset, perhaps in time to start effective therapy? perhaps targeting sigma-1R, or perhaps with betanin, that pigment in beetroot, that seems to disrupt plaque formation.


Protein misfolding as a risk marker for Alzheimer's disease

                                                           
In symptom-free individuals, the detection of misfolded amyloid-beta protein in the blood indicated a considerably higher risk of Alzheimer's disease -- up to 14 years before a clinical diagnosis was made. Amyloid-beta folding proved to be superior to other risk markers evaluated.







Thursday 5 December 2019

Cleveland Clinic Training Video - Psychopharmacology and Autism Spectrum Disorder



    
Today we look at the progressive end of mainstream medicine’s current take on treating autism, a 45 minute training for doctors treating children with autism, produced by the Cleveland Clinic.






Click on the above link and then on the begin activity box, to start the video.  They even have a quiz at the end.


In the pipeline is a relatively simple post all about dietary autism and a complicated one that tries to apply/simplify genetic models of autism. Sigma-1 receptor agonists will get examined; there is a very interesting Russian one called Afobazole, which I was surprised to see is currently sold on Amazon and eBay.  There are many Sigma-1 receptor agonists (Memantine, Donepezil, Sertraline, Haloperidol, Fluvoxamine etc) but they all have other effects that you likely do not want. Afobazole has a different set of other effects (MT1, MT3, NGF, BNDF, GABAergic etc), but most importantly is reported to be well tolerated and non-addictive.  Afobazole was very recently shown to alleviate cognitive rigidity in an experimental model of ASD.

You might get prescribed Memantine, Donepezil, Sertraline, Haloperidol or Fluvoxamine at the Cleveland Clinic, but there is zero chance of being prescribed Afobazole.

Afobazole also looks potentially interesting for Parkinson's, schizophrenia and anywhere there is ER-stress (Endoplasmic Reticulum stress).  More about ER stress in that future post.

















Wednesday 27 November 2019

PolyPill v6 for Severe Autism and now for Smartphones




From my blog statistics I know that many people rely on their smartphone to figure out autism.  Most people look at diets and supplements; I can see that from what words people have put in their Google searches. This blog is about anything that actually works and very often that ends up being a pharmaceutical, which is the last thing most people want to hear.


Today we have a video post on YouTube.  It is a power PowerPoint presentation with narration;  this seems to be the best way to view something on a smart phone.

You can skip through it with volume off, or if you are interested in certain parts listen to the narration.

It is not supposed to be a masterpiece, more of an experiment, without any script/rehearsal/editing. There is a preamble since not everyone is a regular reader of the blog. It is really just another way to spread the word that severe autism is treatable, even if that does open Pandora's box. 





You can either click the image at the start of this post, or the link below:-

                  https://youtu.be/T8-ukM2uuQ4


You may need to scroll the video back to the start, if it re-starts in the middle. 

I have added Clemastine and DMF in version 6 of my Polypill.  Some items remain for completeness (they do work), but are no longer in use.

For any techies among you, this is how people view this blog; quite a lot of a lot of iPhones and android phones, not many iPads.  I use Windows and a big screen.








Wednesday 20 November 2019

Ordinary Gifted or Gifted with Asperger’s Syndrome? And Treatment options for Aspies



Asperger with his Little Professors

This blog is focused more on severe autism, but today it is turn for the Aspies.  The post does rather ramble, because I included some old unused material on micro-dose LSD that may be Aspie-relevant.

Most people diagnosed with autism these days do not have severe autism and so their ideal medical therapy may be very different to the Polypill, I developed for my son.

For a young Aspie he might just need a single intervention like Sertraline (Zoloft) and nothing else, or perhaps Amantadine.

There is more than twenty years of experience medically treating people with Asperger’s, but it very much remains a case of trial and error to find what works.

It does look like most translational research in autism is now focused on those without problems with speech or cognition. That is good news for people with Asperger’s, not so good for the other end of the spectrum.

The paper below is 20 years old, but the medical treatment has not become out of date.






Behavior Problems. Children with AS usually have some behavior problems. They may be compulsive or hyperactive. They may be prone to tantrums or aggressive outbursts. They may routinely hit other children without provocation or touch people in inappropriate ways. Some AS children suffer from anxiety attacks or specific phobias. They may be sensitive to teasing, but consistently demonstrate provocative behaviors that invite teasing. Some AS children will engage adults in endless arguments if given the opportunity. Parents especially may find themselves trapped in repeated discussions about the same events or disagreements. Adults should not attempt to reason for more than a minute with such children (Barron & Barron, 1992; Dewey, 1991; Klin & Volkmar, 1995). Brief, concrete directives are most effective. Visual supports like pictograms can be posted on a child's notebook, desk, or on the wall to visually cue the child regarding expected behaviors. The addition of visual supports can be remarkably effective in helping AS students organize their behavior. Teachers and parents should consult with an augmentative communication specialist to learn more about visual supports.

In addition to behavioral and educational approaches, medications may be helpful in treating specific problematic behaviors. Medications can significantly improve the quality of life of AS children when they exhibit compulsive or aggressive behaviors that interfere with school adjustment or family life. Medication may also be needed to alleviate symptoms of depression, thought disorder, or anxiety attacks. Tofranil and Prozac have been recommended (Grandin, 1992). Beta blockers have been helpful for some aggressive AS children, and Anafranil, Luvox, or one of the SSRIs (e.g., Zoloft) can be useful in reducing obsessive-compulsive tendencies (Gragg & Francis, 1997; Rapoport, 1989).

If you now look at what is recommend today, two decades later it is pretty much the same.

From the Kennedy Krieger Institute:

  
For core anxiety symptoms, her group listed four possible SSRI antidepressants, sertraline (Zoloft), Prozac, Celexa, or escitalopram (Lexapro). That listing was based upon data on children and teenagers who do not have a developmental disorder. The researchers noted that youth with autism often report one particular side effect with SSRI drugs: "behavioral activation," which may appear as hyperactivity, impulsiveness, or trouble sleeping.14 Other possible side effects, which are not unique to autism, are suicidal thoughts in adolescents, or worsening of mood problems in people with bipolar disorder. So these drugs "should be prescribed cautiously in youth with ASD, with close monitoring," the researchers advised. Their article, in the journal Pediatrics, includes starting and maximum doses for doctors to consider. (See Additional Resources below for a link to the article, to share with your health care provider.)

Over at the MIND Institute at UC Davis:-

Specifying and Treating Anxiety in Autism Research (STAAR) Study

At least 50 percent of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) exhibit clinically significant anxiety symptoms. These are associated with increased social deficits, depression, irritability, and stereotyped and self-injurious behaviors. While it is clear that anxiety represents a substantial problem for those with ASD, there are important issues that need to be clarified before effective treatment becomes widespread. This project of the ACE will explore better ways to detect anxiety in children with ASD and determine whether cognitive behavioral therapy or medication can better alleviate their symptoms

  
Studies often appear to show no benefit, but it depends what you choose to measure (the primary outcome) and how large the sample is.



At first, the fluoxetine group appeared to show a slight but significant easing of obsessive-compulsive symptoms after four months compared with the placebo. But after the researchers controlled for factors including age, sex and the severity of symptoms at the start of the trial, the difference vanished. Fluoxetine did no better than the placebo.
The relatively small sample size could have limited the researchers’ ability to detect a benefit from the drug, Neumeyer says. “It’s possible that, with higher numbers, they would’ve found subgroups who benefit from SSRIs,” she says. “That’s the painful part of this [kind of] research though; you’re left wondering.”

Interesting to see low dose Prozac (fluoxetine) used successfully in severe French autism:-

Low-Dose Fluoxetine in Four Children with Autistic Spectrum Disorder Improves Self-Injurious Behavior, ADHD-Like Symptoms, and Irritability


In this article, the authors present four clinical cases of ASD-diagnosed children with ADHD-like symptoms and/or SIB and/or other heteroaggressive behaviors and/or irritability and impulsivity. Each was treated with low doses of fluoxetine, specified as follows: 2.5 mg/d (liquid formulation) in the morning for the first week, followed by a flexible titration schedule based on weight and tolerability. The Hollander et al. protocol [3] is reproduced here, in which children with ASD were given low doses of fluoxetine. Patients were assessed using the Clinical Global Impression Scales (CGI) [12] during the time of fluoxetine introduction and observation. None had tried an SSRI treatment before the reported trial.

In conclusion, in these case reports, we found that the prescription of fluoxetine, in addition to valproate and cyamemazine (Case 1) or to risperidone (Cases 2, 3 and 4), could be effective on severe behavioral symptoms associated with ASD in children. It is important to inform child psychiatrists about this therapeutic possibility even if it would be difficult to predict the rate of responders on the basis of this cases and the literature. The role of comedication remains unanswered as none of our cases was on fluoxetine monotherapy.
  
Recall this old post:- 

When is an SSRI not an SSRI? Low dose SSRIs as Selective Brain Steroidogenic Stimulants (SBSSs) via Allopregnanolone modifying GABAa receptors and neonatal KCC2 expression




Micro-dosing LSD for Aspies?

Since we are on the subject of Aspies, I will insert a post that I never finished.  It is very much for the genuine Aspie, the one with a high IQ, the type working over at Google HQ. Usually male, does not strictly need any medical treatment, but may seek some out nonetheless.

Even though LSD was used at high doses in people with severe autism in the 1960s at UCLA, current interest involves micro-doses taken by people without any severe disability. 

A trial is about to start at Imperial College in London that may particularly interest Californian and Dutch Aspies.



Silicon Valley geeks say it sharpens their thinking and enhances creativity. Other people say it lifts the fog of depression. A novel experiment launching 3 September 2018 will investigate whether microdosing with LSD really does have benefits – or whether it’s all in the mind.
Microdosing using psychedelic drugs – either LSD or magic mushrooms – is said to have become very popular, especially with people working in the Californian digital tech world, some of whom are said to take a tiny amount one or more days a week as part of their routine before heading to work. It’s not for a psychedelic high, though – it’s to make them more focused.
Microdosers tend to use either tiny amounts of LSD – as little as one-fifteenth of a tab – or of psilocybin, the active ingredient in magic mushrooms. The study is recruiting just those who use LSD, because of the difficulty in disguising even ground-up mushrooms in a capsule.
But it’s illegal. So how many people are microdosing is unknown and there is only anecdotal evidence of the effects and any downsides. In a bid to learn more, the Beckley Foundation, which was set up to pioneer research into mind-altering substances, and the unit it funds at Imperial College London, will launch the first ever placebo-controlled trial of microdosing on Monday, 3 September 2018.

It will be unique, says Balázs Szigeti, the study leader. The cost and the illegality of LSD would make a conventional study prohibitively expensive. So he has hit on a way of running it by inviting those who already microdose to join a “self-blinded” study. They will take either what they usually use in a capsule or an identical dummy capsule instead, without knowing which is which. They will complete questionnaires and tests and play cognitive games online, and only at the end will they learn whether they were happy and focused because of LSD or because they thought they were using LSD.

Conclusion

The big difference between treating mild autism (Asperger’s) and severe autism is whether cognitive function is a target.  For severe autism raising cognitive function is the most important target, because it has the potential to improve all other behavioral issues. 

Aspies have been self-treating for decades and in some countries have a helpful psychiatrist happy to prescribe off-label (SSRIs, bet-blockers etc).  They often seem to like 5HT2A agonists.

The effective drugs for mild autism (Asperger’s) may have only limited value to those with severe autism.  Unless you resolve cognitive impairment, you will not transform the developmental trajectory.

It would be helpful if during the initial observational autism diagnosis, the doctor made clear to parents, what kind of autism the child has.   This often is not the case.

It is clear that most people diagnosing autism in very young children do not attempt to measure IQ, or even use an autism ratings scale, like CARS.  There are understandable reasons for this, but it still looks lazy to me.  Nowadays people struggle less hearing the word “autism”, but nobody wants to hear about MR/ID in their 3 year old.  So better to keep silent and avoid parents bursting into tears.

You really do need to be told where you are on the scale from Aspie to the other extreme of Autistic disorder/ Kanner’s/Classic/SDA.  You might think this would be obvious, but it is not.  If you have a 4 year old Aspie, start with Aspie therapies, not therapies for severe autism.

We saw in Catherine Lord’s study that all of those in her 20 year longitudinal study of children with an autism diagnosis, also had an IQ , when measured, indicating MR/ID.  Her study group was a random selection of those diagnosed with autism where she worked.  Back then autism meant autism.  Her “top performing” 40% have normal IQ as adults, but even in that group their measured IQ at age 3 or 4 was less than 70.  This group are not Aspies, they would have had normal/high IQ when tested at the age of 3 or 4.

The meaning of the diagnosis has changed so much in 20 years that the research now talks of autism with a developmental disorder and autism without a developmental disorder.

Actually, “autism” is supposed to be a developmental disorder; that was the whole point. But never mind.

Aspies have had a wide range of treatment options for more than 20 years and they also stand to benefit for the new generation of “autism” drugs, which are actually mainly for mild autism.

As with severe autism, treating an Aspie will also require personalized medicine, or just call it trial and error.  Prozac might be hopeless, but Zoloft work wonders.  ADHD meds might help, or just make things worse.  Oxytocin might improve empathy, or do absolutely nothing.  Perhaps the study at Imperial will show micro-dose LSD does have a benefit.  Since you are fully verbal and have a high IQ it is not hard to establish whether there is a benefit or not, move on and perfect your personal therapy.

It is the other end of the spectrum, where there is a big problem.  You may need to look at the new drugs being developed for Down Syndrome, Fragile-X and the numerous rare single gene autisms. Those drugs will not be cheap.