UA-45667900-1
Showing posts with label Diamox. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Diamox. Show all posts

Wednesday 23 December 2015

“More GABA” for Autism and Epilepsy? Not so Simple

Today’s post was prompted by Tyler highlighting a very recent paper from MIT and Harvard, with some interesting research on GABA in autism.  It also provides the occasion to include an interesting epilepsy therapy, which I encountered a while back.  This fits with my suggestion that the onset of much epilepsy in autism could be prevented.

In the MIT/Harvard study, they were looking into the excitatory/ inhibitory (E/I) imbalance found in ASD and schizophrenia. They used a non-invasive optical method to measure E/I imbalance and this did get some media coverage.  However, I am not sure this could be a diagnostic tool in very young children with classic autism, as was suggested; most such children would not cooperate.  It is not just a problem of being non-verbal, as was suggested in the media.

Indeed, due to the nature of the experiment, the researchers involved older subjects, with milder autism and none had MR/ID (IQ<70).  Being a trial done in the US, of the 20 autistic subjects, 11  were being treated with psychiatric medications: antidepressants (n = 8), antipsychotics (n = 2), antiepileptics (n = 4), and anxiolytics (n = 2).

The easy to read version is from the MIT website:-


Study finds altered brain chemistry in people with autism



The full version is here:-




They used something called Binocular Rivalry  as a proxy for  E/I imbalance.

During binocular rivalry, two images, one presented to each eye, vie for perceptual dominance as neuronal populations that are selective for each eye’s input suppress each other in alternation [16, 17]. The strength of perceptual suppression during rivalry is thought to depend on the balance of inhibitory and excitatory cortical dynamics [12–15] and may serve as a non-invasive perceptual marker of the putative perturbation in inhibitory signaling thought to characterize the autistic brain.

We therefore measured the dynamics of binocular rivalry in individuals with and without a diagnosis of autism (41 individuals, 20 with autism). As predicted, individuals with autism demonstrated a slower rate of binocular rivalry (switches per trial: controls = 8.68, autism = 4.19; F(1,37) = 16.52, hp 2 = 0.311, p = 0.001; Figure 1A), which was marked by reduced periods of perceptual suppression (proportion of each trial spent viewing a dominant percept, (dominant percept durations)/(dominant + mixed percept durations): controls = 0.69; autism = 0.55; F(1,36) = 7.27, hp 2 = 0.172, p = 0.011; Figure 1B). The strength of perceptual suppression inversely predicted clinical measures of autistic symptomatology (Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule [ADOS]: Rs = 0.39, p = 0.027; Figure 1) and showed high test-retest reliability in a control experiment (R = 0.94, p < 0.001; see Supplemental Experimental Procedures and also [18]). These results replicate our previous findings in an independent sample of autistic individuals [11] and confirm rivalry disruptions as a robust behavioral marker of autism.


To test whether altered binocular rivalry dynamics in autism are linked to the reduced action of inhibitory (g-aminobutyric acid [GABA]) or excitatory (glutamate [Glx]) neurotransmitters in the brain, we measured the concentration of these neurotransmitters in visual cortex using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS).


GABA and glutamate are predicted to contribute to different aspects of binocular rivalry dynamics: mutual inhibition between (GABA) and recurrent excitation within (glutamate) populations of neurons coding for the two oscillating percepts [14].

. Critically, reducing either mutual inhibition or recurrent excitation is predicted to reduce the strength of perceptual suppression during rivalry in one implementation of this model [14], mirroring the dynamics we observed in autism. We therefore considered each neurotransmitter separately to test whether inhibitory or excitatory signaling was selectively disrupted in the autistic brain.

As predicted by models of binocular rivalry, GABA concentrations in visual cortex strongly predicted rivalry dynamics in controls, where more GABA corresponded to longer periods of perceptual suppression (Rs = 0.62, p = 0.002; Figure 2B). However, this relationship was strikingly absent in individuals with autism (Rs = 0.02, p = 0.473; Figure 2B). The difference between the two correlations was significant (hp 2 = 0.167, p = 0.013; Figure 2C), indicating a reduced impact of GABA on perceptual suppression in the autistic brain.


GABA was working backwards

Importantly, this finding was specific to GABA: glutamate strongly predicted the dynamics of binocular rivalry in autism (Rs = 0.60, p = 0.004; Figure 2B), to the same degree as that found in controls.


Glumate is working just fine.

These findings suggest that alterations in the GABAergic signaling pathway may characterize autistic neurobiology. Consistent with prior evidence from animal and post-mortem studies, such dysfunction may arise from perturbations in key components of the GABAergic pathway beyond GABA levels, such as receptors [3–9] and inhibitory neuronal density

Together with the pivotal roles of GABA in canonical cortical computations [39] and neurodevelopment [40], these findings point to the GABAergic signaling pathway as a prime suspect in the neurobiology of this pervasive developmental disorder [41]




This study reconfirms what regular readers of this blog already knew.



Epilepsy

I thought it was positive that the MIT researchers suggested that the high level of epilepsy in autism and this E/I imbalance really must be connected.

I have been suggesting for some time that by correcting this E/I imbalance in children with autism, it is likely that the onset of epilepsy could be avoided (in some cases).

I did suggest this to one well known researcher who thought the idea of preventing the onset of epilepsy was not something that the medical community would accept as a concept.

I also raised the novel epilepsy therapy, below, to the same researcher who thought it also would never be considered.

The therapy was to use both bumetanide and potassium bromide to switch GABA back to inhibitory and then give a little boost using a GABA agonist.   

There are many types of epilepsy and some do not respond well to current treatments.  It would seem plausible that the autism-associated type of epilepsy might constitute a specific sub-type.









Potassium Bromide was the original epilepsy therapy over a hundred years ago.  It is still used in Germany as a therapy.  Reports from a century ago suggest it has the same effect in autism as Bumetanide. (we saw this in my post on autism history). 

As you can see on Wikipedia there is a wide range of GABA agonists, but the only ones that would help in epilepsy and autism would be the ones that can cross the blood brain barrier.

GABAA receptor Agonists

·         Bamaluzole
·         GABA
·         Gabamide
·         GABOB
·         Gaboxadol
·         Ibotenic acid
·         Isoguvacine
·         Isonipecotic acid
·         Muscimol
·         Phenibut
·         Picamilon
·         Progabide
·         Quisqualamine
·         SL 75102
·         Thiomuscimol


In an earlier post, we looked at the possible use of small doses of AEDs (anti-epileptic drugs).  One reader found that tiny dose of Valproate (known to raise GABA) had a positive effect when combines with Bumetanide.

In a recent comment one reader showed the same result by combing picamilon with bumetanide.

Both Picamilon and Valproate are having the effect proposed by the epilepsy researchers.

Potassium Bromide does have known side effects, but the idea of further boosting the effect of Bumetanide is interesting.  I have suggested before that this should also be possible using Diamox (Acetazolamide).  Diamox does not affect NKCC1 or EGABA,  it affects the  Cl-/HCO3-exchanger AE3  to further affect Cl- levels.  

I did suggest this a long time ago in my posts on the GABAa receptor.  I am not the only one to realize this.

NKCC1 and AE3 Appear to Accumulate Chloride in Embryonic Motoneurons

   

Picamilon is well researched Russian drug, sold in other countries as a supplement.  It is a modified version of GABA that includes niacin; together it can cross the blood brain barrier (BBB).



So I think a better version of what the epilepsy researchers suggest might be:-

                           Bumetanide  +  Diamox  +  a touch of Picamilon



What would be the effect in autism?











Friday 16 October 2015

It’s not Autism, it’s Sotos Syndrome – and more about GABA therapies




I recently returned from a 25 year class reunion; of the 200 or so class members about 120 turned up. Of the 200 we know that at least 5 have a son with autism and at least one has a nephew with autism.  So I had my first ever “autism lunch” discussing all those tricky issues we are left to deal with.

What was immediately apparent was how different each child’s “autism” was and that none of them were the autism-lite variants that are now being so widely diagnosed in older children. or even adults .  Of the six, two are non-verbal, one is institutionalized, yet one talks a lot.  Three sets of parents are big ABA fans and one child did not respond to ABA.

You may be wondering about that high incidence of autism.  This was not a gathering of science boffins or mathematicians; this was at a business school.  One thing is obvious, you can correlate some autism incidence with educational level.  You can connect all sorts of measures of IQ to autism, from having a math prodigy in the family, to having professors at Ivy league type Universities, particularly in Mathematics.  It does appear to be true that the so-called clever genes are also associated with some types of autism.

I presume that if my science-only university organized such events the incidence of autism would be even higher.

On the way back home we met an acquaintance at the airport, who was telling us all about his son with Sotos Syndrome.  "It is not autism", we were informed, but then I am not quite sure what is.  When you look it up, many of the symptoms look just like autism.  In fact, it is a single gene dysfunction that leads to gigantism and various elements of autism.

This brings me to the painting above of Peter the Wild Boy; it is not me I should point out.  The above Peter was a German boy who came to live in England in the 18th Century; he was non-verbal and is now thought to have had Pitt Hopkins Syndrome.  Like Sotos, this is another very rare single gene disorder.

We have already come across Rett Syndrome, which for some reason is treated as autism.

Fragile X is thought of as a syndrome where autism can be comorbid.

Timothy Syndrome is fortunately extremely rare, but I have already drawn on it in my own research into autism.

There are also autism related disorders involving multiple genes.

Prader–Willi syndrome  is a rare genetic disorder in which seven genes (or some subset thereof) on chromosome 15 (q 11–13) are deleted or unexpressed (chromosome 15q partial deletion) on the paternal chromosome.  If the maternally derived genetic material from the same region is affected instead, the sister Angelman Syndrome is the result.

The most frequent disorder caused by known multiple gene overexpression is Down Syndrome.  We saw in earlier post that DS is caused by the presence of all or part of a third copy of chromosome 21.  This results in over-expression of some 300 genes.


Why So Many Syndromes

Even before the days of genetic testing, these syndromes had been identified.  How could that be?  Each syndrome is marked by clear physical differences.

These physical differences where used to identify those affected.

Within autism too, sometimes there are physical differences.  Big heads, small heads, slim stature or heavy stature, advanced bone age or retarded bone age.


So many syndromes , but no therapies

Many of the rare syndromes have their own foundations funding research, mainly on the basis that if there is a known genetic dysfunction there should be matching therapy somewhere.

As of today, there are no approved therapies for any of these syndromes.


The Futility of Genetic Research?

A great deal of autism research funding goes into looking for target genes.  The idea goes that once you know which gene is the problem you can work out how to correct it.  There are numerous scientific journal dedicated to this approach.

Since no progress has been made in treating known genetic conditions leading to “autism”, is all this research effort well directed?  Some clever researchers think it is not.

All I can do is make my observations from the side lines.

What do Down Syndrome, Autism and Pitt Hopkins Syndrome all have in common?

In at least some of those affected, they have the identical excitatory-inhibitory imbalance of GABA, that can be corrected by Bumetanide.

If you did whole exome genetic testing on the responders with these three conditions you would not find a common genetic dysfunction; and yet they respond to the same therapy.

I am actually all for continued genetic research, but those involved have got to understand its limitations, as well as its potential.



More on GABA

This post returns to the theme of the dysfunctional GABA neurotransmitter because the research indicates it is present in numerous of the above-mentioned conditions. 



·        Autism
·        Fragile X
·        Rett Syndrome
·        Down Syndrome
·        Neurofibromatosis type 1
·        Tourette syndrome
·        Schizophrenia
·        Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)
·        Prader-Willi syndrome
·        Angelman Syndrome


Based on feedback to me, we should add Pitt Hopkins Syndrome to the above list.

The GABA dysfunction is not the same in all the above conditions, but at least in some people, Bumetanide is effective in cases of autism, Down Syndrome and Pitt Hopkins Syndrome.  I suspect that since it works in mice with Fragile-X , it will work in at least some humans.

GABAA has already been covered in some depth in this blog, but I am always on the lookout for more on this subject, since interventions are highly effective.  It is complicated, but for those of you using Bumetanide, Low Dose Clonazepam, Oxytocin and some even Diamox, the paper below will be of interest.



Regular readers will know that in autism high levels of chloride Cl inside the neuron have been shown to make GABA excitatory rather than inhibitory.  This leads to neurons firing too frequently;  this results in effects ranging from anxiety to seizures and with reduced cognitive functioning.  Therapies revolve around reducing chloride levels, this can be done by restricting the flow in ,or by increasing the flow out.  The Na+/K+/Cl cotransporter NKCC1  imports Cl into the neuron.  By blocking this transporter using Bumetanide you can achieve lower Cl within the neuron, but with this drug you also affect NKCC2, an isoform present in the kidney, which is why Bumetanide is a diuretic.  Some experimental drugs are being tested that block NKCC1 without affecting NKCC2 and better cross the blood brain barrier. 

The interesting new approach is to restore Cl balance by increasing KCC2 expression at the plasma membrane.  This means increasing the number of transporters that carry  Cl  out of the neurons.



In the Modulation of GABAergic transmission paper there is no mention of acetazolamide (Diamox) which I suggested in my posts could also reduce Cl, but via the AE3 exchanger.  This would explain why Diamox can reduce seizures in some people.

The paper does mention oxytocin and it does occur to me that babies born via Cesarean/Caesarean section will completely miss this surge of the oxytocin hormone.  This oxytocin surge is suggested to be key to the GABA switch, which should occur soon after birth when GABA switches from excitatory to inhibitory.  In much autism this switch never takes place.

That would suggest that perhaps all babies born via Caesarean section should perhaps receive an artificial dose of oxytocin at birth.  This might then reduce the incidence of GABA dysfunctions in later life, which would include autism and some epilepsy.

Indeed, children born by Caesarean section (CS) are 20% more likely to develop autism.


Conclusions and Relevance  This study confirms previous findings that children born by CS are approximately 20% more likely to be diagnosed as having ASD. However, the association did not persist when using sibling controls, implying that this association is due to familial confounding by genetic and/or environmental factors.

So as not to repeat the vaccine/autism scare, the researchers do not say that Caesarean section leads to more autism, rather that the kinds of people who are born by Caesarean section already had an elevated risk of autism.  This is based on analysing sibling pairs, but I do not entirely buy into that argument.  They do not want to scare people from having a procedure that can be life-saving for mother and baby.

If you look at it rationally, you can see that the oxytocin surge at birth is there for an evolutionary reason.  It is very easy to recreate it with synthetic oxytocin.

Another interesting point is in the conflict of interest statement:-


Laura Cancedda is on the Provisional Application: US 61/919,195, 2013. Modulators of Intracellular Chloride Concentration For Treating An Intellectual Disability


Regular readers will note that in this blog we have known for some time that modifying GABAA leads to improved cognitive function.  I even suggested to Ben-Ari that IQ should be measured in their autism trials for Bumetanide.  IQ is much less subjective than measures of autism.


Conclusion

My conclusion is that while genetic testing has its place, it is more productive to look at identifying and treating the downstream dysfunctions that are shared by many individual genetic dysfunctions.

By focusing on individual genes there is a big risk of just giving up, so if you have Pitt Hopkins Syndrome, like Peter the Wild Boy, it is a single gene cause of “autism” and there is no known therapy.  Well it seems that it shares downstream consequences with many other types of autism, so it is treatable after all.

I also think more people need to consider that cognitive dysfunction (Intellectual Disability/MR) may indeed be treatable, and not just via GABA; so good luck to Laura Cancedda.







Wednesday 27 May 2015

Diamox & Bumetanide, Ion Channels Nav1.4 and Cav1.1, HypoPP, Autism and Seizures









Today’s post links together subjects that have been covered previously.

It does suggest that there are multiple therapies that may be effective in the large sub-group of autism that is characterized by the neurotransmitter GABA being excitatory (E) rather than inhibitory (I).  The science was covered in the earlier very complicated post:-



The growing list of potential therapies is:-

·        Bumetanide (awaiting funding for Stage 3 clinical trials in humans)
·        Micro-dose Clonazepam (trials in mouse models of autism)
·        Diamox (off-label use in autism)
·        Potassium Bromide  - to be covered in a later post (in use for 150 years)


Not surprisingly, all of these drugs also have an effect on certain types of seizure.

The optimal therapy in people with this E/I imbalance will likely be a combination of some of the above.



Periodic paralysis

Periodic paralysis (Hypokalemic periodic paralysis or HypoPP) is a rare condition that causes temporary paralysis that can be reversed by taking potassium.  A similar condition is hypokalemic sensory overload, when someone becomes overwhelmed by lights or sounds, but after taking potassium all goes back to normal. Autistic sensory overload, experienced by most people with autism, can also be reduced by potassium.

Though rare, we know that HypoPP is caused by dysfunction in the ion channels Nav1.4 and/or Cav1.1.

For decades one of the treatments for HypoPP has been a diuretic called Diamox/Acetazolamide.

Other treatments include raising potassium levels using supplements or potassium sparing diuretics.

Bumetanide is a diuretic, but rather than raising potassium levels, it does the opposite.  So I always thought it was odd that bumetanide would have a positive effect on HypoPP.  But the research showed a benefit.


Autism and Channelopathies

We know that autism and epilepsy are associated with various ion channel and transporter dysfunctions (channelopathies).  In a recent post I was talking about Cav1.1 to Cav1.4.

Today we are talking about Cav1.1 and Nav1.4.

We know that Nav1.1 is associated with epilepsy and some autism (Dravet syndrome).


Nav1.4 is expressed at high levels in adult skeletal muscle, at low levels in neonatal skeletal muscle, and not at all in brain

Nav1.1 expression increases during the third postnatal week and peaks at the end of the first postnatal month, after which levels decrease by about 50% in the adult.

We saw with calcium channels that a dysfunction in one of Cav1.1 to Cav1.4 can cause a dysfunction in another dysfunction in another one of Cav1.1 to Cav1.4.

We also so that in autism the change in expression of NKCC1 and KCC2 as the brain matures failed to occur and so in effect they remain immature and therefore malfunction.

So it is plausible that sodium channels may also malfunction in a similar way. 
  



Hypokalemic periodic paralysis (hypoPP) is an autosomal dominant neuromuscular disorder characterized by episodes of flaccid skeletal muscle paralysis accompanied by reduced serum potassium levels. It is caused by mutations in one of two sarcolemmal ion channel genes, CACNA1S and SCN4A1-3 that lead to dysfunction of the dihydropyridine receptor or the alpha sub-unit of the skeletal muscle voltage gated sodium channel Nav1.4. Seventy to eighty percent of cases are caused by mutations of CACNA1S and ten percent by mutations of SCN4A4. 

There are no consensus guidelines for the treatment of hypoPP. Current pharmacological agents commonly used include potassium supplements, potassium sparing diuretics and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (acetazolamide and dichlorphenamide). Dichlorphenamide is the only therapy for hypoPP to have undergone a randomized double blind placebo controlled cross over trial. This trial showed a significant efficacy of dichlorphenamide in reducing attack frequency but the inclusion criteria were based on clinical diagnosis of hypoPP and not genetic confirmation.

  


Cav1.1 also known as the calcium channel, voltage-dependent, L type, alpha 1S subunit, (CACNA1S), is a protein which in humans is encoded by the CACNA1S gene




Nav1.4

Sodium channel protein type 4 subunit alpha is a protein that in humans is encoded by the SCN4A gene.

The Nav1.4 voltage-gated sodium channel is encoded by the SCN4A gene. Mutations in the gene are associated with hypokalemic periodic paralysis, hyperkalemic periodic paralysis, paramyotonia congenita, and potassium-aggravated myotonia.



Ranolazine

Ranolazine is an antianginal and anti-ischemic drug that is used in patients with chronic angina. Ranzoline blocks Na+ currents of Nav1.4. Both muscle and neuronal Na+ channels are as sensitive to ranolazine block as their cardiac counterparts. At its therapeutic plasma concentrations, ranolazine interacts predominantly with the open but not resting or inactivated Na+ channels. Ranolazine block of open Na+ channels is via the conserved local anesthetic receptor albeit with a relatively slow on-rate.


Muscle channelopathies:does the predicted channel gating pore offer new treatment insights for hypokalaemic periodic paralysis?


Beneficial effects of bumetanide in a CaV1.1-R528H mouse model of hypokalaemic periodic paralysis
Transient attacks of weakness in hypokalaemic periodic paralysis are caused by reduced fibre excitability from paradoxical depolarization of the resting potential in low potassium. Mutations of calcium channel and sodium channel genes have been identified as the underlying molecular defects that cause instability of the resting potential. Despite these scientific advances, therapeutic options remain limited. In a mouse model of hypokalaemic periodic paralysis from a sodium channel mutation (NaV1.4-R669H), we recently showed that inhibition of chloride influx with bumetanide reduced the susceptibility to attacks of weakness, in vitro. The R528H mutation in the calcium channel gene (CACNA1S encoding CaV1.1) is the most common cause of hypokalaemic periodic paralysis. We developed a CaV1.1-R528H knock-in mouse model of hypokalaemic periodic paralysis and show herein that bumetanide protects against both muscle weakness from low K+ challenge in vitro and loss of muscle excitability in vivo from a glucose plus insulin infusion. This work demonstrates the critical role of the chloride gradient in modulating the susceptibility to ictal weakness and establishes bumetanide as a potential therapy for hypokalaemic periodic paralysis arising from either NaV1.4 or CaV1.1 mutations.







Mode of action

The research does state that nobody knows why Diamox is effective in many cases of hypoPP.

My reading of the research has already taken me in a different direction.  While researching the GABAA receptor that is dysfunctional in some autism, it occurred to me that in addition to targeting the NKCC1 receptor with bumetanide, another way of lowering chloride levels within the cells might well exist.

I suggested in an earlier post that Diamox could be used to target the AE3 exchanger.


What Diamox (acetazolamide) does is lower the pH of the blood in the following way.


Acetazolamide is a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, hence causing the accumulation of carbonic acid Carbonic anhydrase is an enzyme found in red blood cells that catalyses the following reaction:




hence lowering blood pH, by means of the following reaction that carbonic acid undergoes


In doing so there will be an effect on both AE3 and NDAE, below.  This will change the intracellular concentration of Cl-, and hence give a similar result to bumetanide.

This would also explain the phenomenon cited below that pH affects the excitability of the brain.

Over excitability of the brain is the cause of some of the effects seen as autism and clearly Over excitability of the brain will be the cause of some people’s seizures/epilepsy.

Not surprisingly, then one of the uses of Diamox is to avoid seizures.





  




Anion exchanger 3 (AE3) in autism

Anion exchange protein 3 is a membrane transport protein that in humans is encoded by the SLC4A3 gene. It exchanges chloride for bicarbonate ions.  It increases chloride concentration within the cell.  AE3 is an anion exchanger that is primarily expressed in the brain and heart

Its activity is sensitive to pH. AE3 mutations have been linked to seizures


Bicarbonate (HCO3-) transport mechanisms are the principal regulators of pH in animal cells. Such transport also plays a vital role in acid-base movements in the stomach, pancreas, intestine, kidney, reproductive organs and the central nervous system.


Abstract

Chloride influx through GABA-gated Cl channels, the principal mechanism for inhibiting neural activity in the brain, requires a Cl gradient established in part by K+–Cl cotransporters (KCCs). We screened for Caenorhabditis elegans mutants defective for inhibitory neurotransmission and identified mutations in ABTS-1, a Na+-driven Cl–HCO3 exchanger that extrudes chloride from cells, like KCC-2, but also alkalinizes them. While animals lacking ABTS-1 or the K+–Cl cotransporter KCC-2 display only mild behavioural defects, animals lacking both Cl extruders are paralyzed. This is apparently due to severe disruption of the cellular Cl gradient such that Cl flow through GABA-gated channels is reversed and excites rather than inhibits cells. Neuronal expression of both transporters is upregulated during synapse development, and ABTS-1 expression further increases in KCC-2 mutants, suggesting regulation of these transporters is coordinated to control the cellular Cl gradient. Our results show that Na+-driven Cl–HCO3 exchangers function with KCCs in generating the cellular chloride gradient and suggest a mechanism for the close tie between pH and excitability in the brain.



Abstract

During early development, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) depolarizes and excites neurons, contrary to its typical function in the mature nervous system. As a result, developing networks are hyperexcitable and experience a spontaneous network activity that is important for several aspects of development. GABA is depolarizing because chloride is accumulated beyond its passive distribution in these developing cells. Identifying all of the transporters that accumulate chloride in immature neurons has been elusive and it is unknown whether chloride levels are different at synaptic and extrasynaptic locations. We have therefore assessed intracellular chloride levels specifically at synaptic locations in embryonic motoneurons by measuring the GABAergic reversal potential (EGABA) for GABAA miniature postsynaptic currents. When whole cell patch solutions contained 17–52 mM chloride, we found that synaptic EGABA was around −30 mV. Because of the low HCO3 permeability of the GABAA receptor, this value of EGABA corresponds to approximately 50 mM intracellular chloride. It is likely that synaptic chloride is maintained at levels higher than the patch solution by chloride accumulators. We show that the Na+-K+-2Cl cotransporter, NKCC1, is clearly involved in the accumulation of chloride in motoneurons because blocking this transporter hyperpolarized EGABA and reduced nerve potentials evoked by local application of a GABAA agonist. However, chloride accumulation following NKCC1 block was still clearly present. We find physiological evidence of chloride accumulation that is dependent on HCO3 and sensitive to an anion exchanger blocker. These results suggest that the anion exchanger, AE3, is also likely to contribute to chloride accumulation in embryonic motoneurons.
 



Conclusion

So the science does confirm that “chloride accumulation following NKCC1 block was still clearly present”.  This means that bumetanide is likely only a partial solution.

We also see that “anion exchanger, AE3, is also likely to contribute to chloride accumulation in embryonic motoneurons” and “that chloride accumulation that is dependent on HCO3”.

This is a subject of some research, but it is still early days.

  
I suggest that Diamox, via its effect on HCO3, may affect anion exchanger AE3 and further reduce chloride accumulation within cells.  This may have a further cumulative effect on GABA.

As we saw earlier, bumetanide does indeed shift GABA from excitatory to inhibitory in people who neurons remain in an immature state (like those of a typical two week old baby).  To my surprise, the use of micro-dose Clonazepam, as proposed by Professor Catterall, but in addition to Bumetanide, has a further effect on GABA’s excitatory/inhibitory imbalance.

Taken together this would highlight the possible further benefit of Diamox.

Normal blood pH is tightly regulated between 7.35 and 7.45.  I do wonder if perhaps in some people with autism, the pH of their blood is slightly elevated (alkaline), this would contribute to excitability of the brain.

Since Diamox increases the oxygen carrying capacity of the blood, I further wonder if this additional oxygen may also be beneficial in some cases.  Since some people are adamant that hypobaric oxygen therapy has beneficial (although not sustained) effects in autism, surely a better treatment would be Diamox?

Since the body is controlled via so-called feedback loops, perhaps in a small subset of people with autism who respond to extra O2, they actually have blood pH that is higher than 7.45.  In which case measuring blood pH would be a biomarker of who would respond to hypobaric oxygen therapy.  Not surprisingly then, trials of hypobaric oxygen therapy in autism fail, because most of the trial subjects do not have elevated blood pH.
  
So there are many reasons that Diamox should be trialed in autism.  I did find one (DAN) doctor currently using it, but they do not really explain why.

Biomedical Treatment of the Young Adult with ASD