Learning from GABAa Dysfunction in Huntington’s Disease – useful ideas for Autism therapies?

Today’s post is really for the regular readers of this blog who are interested in the GABA switch and Bumetanide. It is not light reading.  We see how advanced some Taiwanese researchers are in their understanding of GABA_A dysfunctions in Huntington’s Disease.

Taipei 101, briefly the world’s tallest building

It is an excellent paper and much of it is applicable to autism. There are some omissions, but you will struggle to find a more complete paper.

They even go into the detail of altered the sub-unit expression of GABA_A receptors that occurs as the disease progresses. I think that correcting sub-unit miss-expression has great potential in treating some autism.

Huntington’s is an inherited brain disorder that first manifests itself around the age of 40 and then progresses for the next 15 to 20 years.

Much autism is present prior to birth but there is a progression that occurs as the brain develops in early childhood. Some people do seem to be entirely typical at birth and only around 2 years old develop symptoms. After 5 years old you cannot really develop “autism”, just the symptoms might not get noticed till later in life.

Schizophrenia only develops in early to mid-adulthood.

It is surprising to many people that such varied disorders share some similar aspects of biology.

In terms of practical interventions, in today’s paper these include:       

·        Inhibition of NKCC1 (bumetanide)

·        Activation of KCC2 (N-Ethylmaleimide)

·        Enhancer of CKB (creatine)

·        Inhibitor of WNK/SPAK

·        Activation of extra-synaptic GABAa receptors (taurine, progesterone)

·        Activation of synaptic GABAa receptors (zolpidem, alprazolam)

·        Inhibition of GABA transport mechanism (Tiagabine)

One thing to note is that activating GABAa receptors may well have a negative effect in some people.

Sub-unit specific therapies, like very low dose clonazepam targeting α3, are not mentioned in this paper, nor is the role of GABAb on NKCC1/KCC2 expression.

We are familiar with Bumetanide as an NKCC1 blocker intervention in autism, but looking at the list there are other common autism therapies (creatine and taurine) and the female hormone progesterone. We come upon the beneficial effect of female hormones on a regular basis in this blog (estradiol, pregnenalone, progesterone …).  We even saw how a sub-SSRI dose of Prozac increases the amount of the neurosteroid 3α-hydroxy-5α-pregnan-20-one (Allo) that potently, positively, and allosterically modulates GABA action at GABA_A receptors. Progesterone is converted to Allo in the body.

 

Here is the excellent paper on Huntington’s:-

Insights into GABAAergic system alteration in Huntington’s disease

                                                                                                               

An overview of the g-aminobutyric acid (GABA) signalling system. (a) GABA homeostasis is regulated by neurons and astrocytes. GABA is synthesized by GAD65/67 from glutamate in neurons, while astrocytic GABA is synthesized through MAOB. The release of GABA is mediated by membrane depolarization in neurons and Best1 in astrocytes. The reuptake of GABA is mediated through GAT1 in neurons and GAT3 in astrocytes. The metabolism of GABA is mediated by GABA-T in neurons and astrocytes. The reuptake of GABA in astrocytes is further transformed into glutamine via the TCA cycle and glutamine synthetase (GS). The glutamine is then transported to neurons and converted to glutamate for regeneration of GABA.

(b) GABAA receptors are heteropentameric complexes assembled from 19 different subunits. The compositions of different subunits determines the subcellular distributions and functional properties of the receptors. Phasic inhibition is mediated via the activation of synaptic GABAA receptors following brief exposure to a high concentration of extracellular GABA. Tonic inhibition is mediated via the activation of extrasynaptic GABAA receptors by a low concentration of ambient GABA.

c) The excitatory inhibitory response of GABA is driven by the chloride gradient across cell membranes, which can be determined via two cation–chloride cotransporters (NKCC1 and KCC2). The high expression of NKCC1 during the developmental stage maintains higher intracellular [Cl2] via chloride influx to the cell. The activation of GABAA receptors at an early developmental stage results in an outward flow of chloride and an excitatory GABAergic response. As neurons mature, the high expression of KCC2 maintains lower intracellular [Cl2] via chloride efflux out of the cell. The activation of GABAA receptors on mature neurons results in the inward flow of chloride and an inhibitory GABAergic response.

An excerpt showing data on sub-unit misexpression in different parts of the brain at different stages of the disease

5.2. Modulation of chloride homeostasis via cation – chloride cotransporters

Emerging evidence suggests that chloride homeostasis is a therapeutic target for HD. Pharmacological agents that target cation–chloride cotransporters (i.e. NKCC1 or KCC2) therefore might be used to treat HD (figure 3b). Of note, dysregulation of cation–chloride cotransporters and GABA polarity was associated with several neuropsychiatric disorders [70,134–139] (reviewed in [27,140]). Such abnormal excitatory GABAA receptor neurotransmission can be rescued by bumetanide, an NKCC1 inhibitor that decreases intracellular chloride concentration. Bumetanide is an FDA-approved diuretic agent that has been used in the clinic. It attenuates many neurological and psychiatric disorders in preclinical studies and some clinical trials for traumatic brain injury, seizure, chronic pain, cerebral infarction, Down syndrome, schizophrenia, fragile X syndrome and autism (reviewed in [141]). Daily intraperitoneal injections of bumetanide also restored the impaired motor function of HD mice. The effect of bumetanide is likely to be mediated by NKCC1 because genetic ablation of NKCC1 in the striatum also rescued the motor deficits in R6/2 mice. This study uncovered a previously unrecognized depolarizing or excitatory action of GABA in the aberrant motor control in HD. In addition, chronic treatment with bumetanide also improved the impaired memory in R6/2 mice [69], supporting the importance of NKCC1 in HD pathogenesis. Owing to the poor ability of bumetanide to pass through the blood–brain barrier, further optimization of bumetanide and other NKCC1 inhibitors is warranted [142,143]. Disruption of KCC2 function is detrimental to inhibitory transmission and agents to activate KCC2 function would be beneficial in HD. However, no agonist of KCC2 has been described until very recently [144,145]. A new KCC2 agonist (CLP290) has been shown to facilitate functional recovery after spinal cord injury [145]. It would be of great interest to evaluate the effect of KCC2 agonists on HD progression. Another KCC2 activator, CLP257, was found to increase the cell surface expression of KCC2 in a rat model of neuropathic pain [146]. Post-translational modification of KCC2 by kinases may modulate the function of KCC2. The WNK/ SPAK kinase complex, composed of WNK (with no lysine) and SPAK (SPS1-related proline/alanine-rich kinase), is known to phosphorylate and stimulate NKCC1 or inhibit KCC2 [147]. Thus, compounds that inhibit WNK/SPAK kinases will result in KCC2 activation and NKCC1 inhibition. Some compounds have been noted as potential inhibitors of WNK/SPAK kinases and need to be further tested for their effects on cation –chloride cotransporters [148–150]. An alternative mechanism to activate KCC2 is manipulation of its interacting proteins (e.g. CKB [65,66]). Because CKB could activate the function of KCC2 [65,66], CKB enhancers may increase the function of KCC2. In HD, reduced expression and activity of CKB is associated with motor deficits and hearing impairment [68,88]. Enhancing CKB activity by creatine supplements ameliorated the motor deficits and hearing impairment of HD mice. It is worthwhile to further investigate the interaction of KCC2 and CKB in GABAergic neurotransmission and motor deficits in HD. The depolarizing GABA action with altered expression levels of NKCC1 or KCC2 is associated with neuroinflammation in HD brains [32,69]. Blockade of TNF-a using Xpro1595 (a dominant negative inhibitor of soluble TNF-a) [151] in vivo led to significant beneficial effects on disease progression in HD mice [152] and reduced the expression of NKCC1. It would be of great interest to test the effect of other anti-inflammatory agents [153] on the function and expression of NKCC1 and GABAergic inhibition. Neuroinflammation is implicated in most neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease [154,155], and the interaction of cation–chloride cotransporters and neuroinflammation in GABAergic neurotransmission may also play a critical role in other neurodegenerative diseases.

Figure 2. Molecular mechanism(s) underlying the abnormal GABAAergic system in HD. (a) In the normal condition, adult neurons express high KCC2 and few NKCC1 to maintain the lower intracellular chloride concentration, which results in an inward flow of chloride when GABAA receptors are activated. Astrocytes function normally for the homeostasis of glutamate, potassium and glutamate/GABA-glutamine cycle. (b) In Huntington’s disease, reduced GABAA receptor-mediated neuronal inhibition is associated with enhanced NKCC1 expression and a decreased expression in KCC2 and membrane localized GABAA receptors. The dysregulated GABAAergic system might be caused by mutant HTT, excitotoxicity, neuroinflammation or other factors. Mutant HTT in neurons alters the transcription of genes (GABAAR and KCC2) through interactions with transcriptional activators (SP1) and repressors (REST/NRSF). Mutant HTT in neurons also disrupts the intracellular trafficking of GABAARs to the cellular membrane. HD astrocytes have impaired homeostasis of extracellular potassium/glutamate (due to deficits of astrocytic Kir4.1 channel and glutamate transporters, Glt-1) and cause neuronal excitability, which might be related to the changes of KCC2, NKCC1 and GABAAR. The activity of KCC2 could be affected through its interacting proteins, such as CKB and mHTT. Neuroinflammation, which is evoked by the interaction of HD astrocyte and microglia, enhances NKCC1 expression in neurons at the transcriptional level through an NF-kB-dependent pathway. HD astrocytes also have compromised astrocytic metabolism of glutamate/GABA–glutamine cycle that contributes to lower GABA synthesis.

Notably, neuroinflammation and the GABA neurotransmitter system are reciprocally regulated in the brain (reviewed in [104,105]). Specifically, neuroinflammation induces changes in the GABA neurotransmitter system, such as reduced GABAA receptor subunit expression, while activation

of GABAA receptors likely antagonizes inflammation.

TNF-a, a proinflammatory cytokine, induces a downregulation of the surface expression of GABAARs containing a1, a2, b2/3 and g2 subunits and a decrease in inhibitory synaptic strength in a cellular model of hippocampal neuron culture [106]. The same group further demonstrated that protein phosphatase 1-dependent trafficking of GABAARs was involved in the TNF-a evoked downregulation of GABAergic neurotransmission [107]. Upregulation of TNF-a also negatively impacts the expression of GABAAR a2 subunit mRNA and thus decreases the presynaptic inhibition in the dorsal root ganglion in a rat experimental neuropathic painmodel [108]. Conversely, blockade of central GABAARs in mice by aGABAAR antagonist increased both the basal and restraint stress-induced plasma IL-6 levels [109]. Inhibition of GABAAR activation by picrotoxin increased the nuclear translocation of NF-kB in acute hippocampal slice preparations [110]. Collectively, neuroinflammation

weakens the inhibitory synaptic strength in neurons, at least partly, through the reduction of GABAARs.

The reduced expression and function of GABAARs may further increase inflammatory responses. It remains elusive whether the same mechanism occurs in the inflammatory environment in HD brains.

hyperexcitability resulting from deficiency of astrocytic Kir4.1 might have also contributed to neuronal NKCC1 upregulation and altered GABAergic signalling in HD brains.

Figure 3. Strategy to target (a) GABAAR and (b) cation–chloride cotransporters as potential therapeutic avenues. (a) The GABAergic system is influenced directly by agents that (1) target synaptic GABAAR, (2) increase tonic GABA current or interfere with synaptic GABA concentrations via a reduction of GABA reuptake (3), and (4) block GABA metabolism.

5.1. Modulating the GABAA receptor as a therapeutic target

In view of the presently discovered HD-related deficit in the GABA system, the question arises whether HD patients can benefit from drugs that stimulate the GABA system (figure 3a). HD patients suffer from motor abnormalities and

non-motor symptoms, including cognitive deficits, psychiatric symptoms, sleep disturbance, irritability, anxiety, depression and an increased incidence of seizures [74,77,116,117].

Seizures are a well-established part of juvenile HD but no more prevalent in adult-onset HD than in the general population [73,74,118]. Several pharmacological compounds can enhance inhibitory GABAergic neurotransmission by targeting GABAAR and thereby producing sedative, anxiolytic, anticonvulsant and muscle-relaxant effects. A recent study demonstrated that zolpidem, a GABAAR modulator that enhances GABA inhibition mainly via the a1-containing GABAA receptors, corrected sleep disturbance and electroencephalographic abnormalities in symptomatic HD mice (R6/2) [119]. Alprazolam, a benzodiazepine-activating GABA receptor, reversed the dysregulated circadian rhythms and improved cognitive performance of HD mice (R6/2) [120].

In addition, progesterone, a positive modulator of GABAAR, significantly reversed the behavioural impairment in a 3-nitropropionic acid (3-NP)-induced HD rat model [121]. Apart from modulating the activity of the GABAergic system by interfering directly with the receptor, pharmacological agents can also interfere with synaptic GABA concentrations. Tiagabine, a drug that specifically blocks the GABA transporter (GAT1) to increase synaptic GABA level,was found to improve motor performance and extend survival inN171-82Q and R6/2 mice [122]. It is also worth evaluating whether vigabatrin, a GABA-T inhibitor that blocksGABAcatabolismin neurons and astrocytes [123], plays a role in the compromised astrocytic glutamate–GABA–glutamine cycling [56]. Interestingly, taurine exerted GABAA agonistic and antioxidant activities in a 3-NP HD model and improved locomotor deficits and increased GABA levels [124]. However, several early studies failed to provide the expected benefits of GABA analogues in slowing disease progression in HD patients [125–127]. For example, gaboxadol, an agonist for the extrasynaptic d-containing GABAA receptor, failed to improve the decline in cognitive and motor functions of five HD patients during a short two-week trial, but it caused side effects at the maximal dose [125]. Interestingly, although treatment with muscimol (a potent agonist of GABA receptors) did not improve motor or cognitive deficits in 10HDpatients, it did ameliorate chorea in the most severely hyperkinetic patient [126]. The therapeutic failure of GABA stimulation in early clinical trials does not argue against the importance of GABAergic deficits in HD pathogenesis. The alteration of GABAergic circuits plays a primary role or is a compensatory response to excitotoxicity, and it may contribute to HD by disrupting the balance between the excitation and inhibition systems and the overall functions of neuronal circuits. Because the subunits of the GABAA receptor are brain region- or neuron subtypespecific, the choice of drugs may have distinct effects on the brain region or neuronal population targeted [128–130]. For example, the expression of GABAAR subunits is differentially altered in MSNs and other striatal interneurons in HD 54,60]. The early involvement of D2-expressing MSNs can cause chorea [131], while dysfunctional PV-expressing interneurons can cause dystonia in HD patients [132]. Specific alteration in neuronal populations and receptor subtypes during HD progression needs to be taken into consideration when treating the dysfunction of GABAergic circuitry.

Notably, striatal tonic inhibition mediated by the dcontaining GABAARs may have neuroprotective effects against excitotoxicity in the adult striatum [63]. Because the reductions in d-containing GABAARs and tonic GABA currents in D2-expressing MSNs have been observed in early HD [32,39,40,54,61], it would be of great interest to evaluate the effects of several available compounds, such as alphaxalone and ganaxolone [133], that target d-containing GABAARs, in animal models of HD.

(b) GABAAR-mediated signalling in HD neurons is depolarizing due to the high intracellular chloride concentration caused by high NKCC1 expression and low KCC2 expression. Rescuing the function of cation–chloride cotransporters can occur via (1) inhibition of NKCC1 activity using bumetanide, (2, 3) increase in KCC2 function using a KCC2 activator or CKB enhancer, and (4) inhibitors of WNK/SPAK kinases.

5.2. Modulation of chloride homeostasis via cation–chloride cotransporters

Emerging evidence suggests that chloride homeostasis is a therapeutic target for HD. Pharmacological agents that target cation–chloride cotransporters (i.e.NKCC1 orKCC2) therefore might be used to treat HD (figure 3b). Of note, dysregulation of cation–chloride cotransporters and GABA polarity was associated with several neuropsychiatric disorders [70,134–139] (reviewed in [27,140]). Such abnormal   receptor neurotransmission can be rescued by bumetanide, an NKCC1 inhibitor that decreases intracellular chloride concentration. Bumetanide is an FDA-approved diuretic agent that has been used in the clinic. It attenuates many neurological and psychiatric disorders in preclinical studies and some clinical trials for traumatic brain injury, seizure, chronic pain, cerebral infarction, Down syndrome, schizophrenia, fragile X syndrome and autism (reviewed in [141]). Daily intraperitoneal injections of bumetanide also restored the impaired motor function ofHDmice (R6/2, Y-T Hsu,Y-GChang, Y-CLi, K-YWang, H-MChen, D-J Lee, C-HTsai, C-C Lien,YChern 2018, personal communication). The effect of bumetanide is likely to be mediated by NKCC1 because genetic ablation of NKCC1 in the striatum also rescued the motor deficits in R6/2 mice (Y-T Hsu, Y-G Chang, Y-C Li, K-Y Wang, H-M Chen, D-J Lee, C-H Tsai, C-C Lien, Y Chern 2018, personal communication). This study uncovered a previously unrecognized depolarizing or excitatory action of GABA in the aberrant motor control in HD. In addition, chronic treatment with bumetanide also improved the impaired memory in R6/2 mice [69], supporting the importance of NKCC1 in HD pathogenesis. Owing to the poor ability of bumetanide to pass through the blood–brain barrier, further optimization of bumetanide and other NKCC1 inhibitors is warranted [142,143].

Disruption of KCC2 function is detrimental to inhibitory transmission and agents to activate KCC2 function would be beneficial in HD. However, no agonist of KCC2 has been described until very recently [144,145]. A new KCC2 agonist (CLP290) has been shown to facilitate functional recovery after spinal cord injury [145]. It would be of great interest to evaluate the effect of KCC2 agonists on HD progression. Another KCC2 activator, CLP257, was found to increase the cell surface expression of KCC2 in a rat model of neuropathic pain [146]. Post-translational modification of KCC2 by kinases may modulate the function of KCC2. The WNK/SPAK kinase complex, composed of WNK (with no lysine) and SPAK (SPS1-related proline/alanine-rich kinase), is known to phosphorylate and stimulate NKCC1 or inhibit KCC2 [147]. Thus, compounds that inhibit WNK/SPAK kinases will result in KCC2 activation and NKCC1 inhibition.

Some compounds have been noted as potential inhibitors of WNK/SPAK kinases and need to be further tested for their effects on cation–chloride cotransporters [148–150]. An alternative mechanism to activate KCC2 is manipulation of its interacting proteins (e.g. CKB [65,66]). Because CKB could activate the function of KCC2 [65,66], CKB enhancers may increase the function of KCC2. In HD, reduced expression and activity of CKB is associated with motor deficits and hearing impairment [68,88]. Enhancing CKB activity by creatine supplements ameliorated the motor deficits and hearing impairment of HD mice. It is worthwhile to further investigate the interaction of KCC2 and CKB in GABAergic neurotransmission and motor deficits in HD. The depolarizing GABA action with altered expression levels of NKCC1 or KCC2 is associated with neuroinflammation in HD brains [32,69]. Blockade of TNF-a using Xpro1595 (a dominant negative inhibitor of soluble TNF-a) [151] in vivo led to significant beneficial effects on disease progression in HD mice [152] and reduced the expression of NKCC1It would be of great interest to test the effect of other anti-inflammatory agents [153] on the function and expression of NKCC1 and GABAergic inhibition. Neuroinflammation is implicated in most neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease [154,155], and the interaction of cation–chloride cotransporters and neuroinflammation in GABAergic neurotransmission may also play a critical role in other neurodegenerative diseases.

Chloride extrusion enhancers as novel therapeutics for neurological diseases

Discovery of Novel SPAK Inhibitors That Block WNK Kinase Signaling to Cation Chloride Transporters

Upon activation by with-no-lysine kinases, STE20/SPS1-related proline–alanine-rich protein kinase (SPAK) phosphorylates and activates SLC12A transporters such as the Na⁺-Cl⁻ cotransporter (NCC) and Na⁺-K⁺-2Cl⁻ cotransporter type 1 (NKCC1) and type 2 (NKCC2); these transporters have important roles in regulating BP through NaCl reabsorption and vasoconstriction. SPAK knockout mice are viable and display hypotension with decreased activity (phosphorylation) of NCC and NKCC1 in the kidneys and aorta, respectively. Therefore, agents that inhibit SPAK activity could be a new class of antihypertensive drugs with dual actions (i.e., NaCl diuresis and vasodilation). In this study, we developed a new ELISA-based screening system to find novel SPAK inhibitors and screened >20,000 small-molecule compounds. Furthermore, we used a drug repositioning strategy to identify existing drugs that inhibit SPAK activity. As a result, we discovered one small-molecule compound (Stock 1S-14279) and an antiparasitic agent (Closantel) that inhibited SPAK-regulated phosphorylation and activation of NCC and NKCC1 in vitro and in mice. Notably, these compounds had structural similarity and inhibited SPAK in an ATP-insensitive manner. We propose that the two compounds found in this study may have great potential as novel antihypertensive drugs.

Chemical library screening for WNK signalling inhibitors using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy.

WNKs (with-no-lysine kinases) are the causative genes of a hereditary hypertensive disease, PHAII (pseudohypoaldosteronism type II), and form a signal cascade with OSR1 (oxidative stress-responsive 1)/SPAK (STE20/SPS1-related proline/alanine-rich protein kinase) and Slc12a (solute carrier family 12) transporters. We have shown that this signal cascade regulates blood pressure by controlling vascular tone as well as renal NaCl excretion. Therefore agents that inhibit this signal cascade could be a new class of antihypertensive drugs. Since the binding of WNK to OSR1/SPAK kinases was postulated to be important for signal transduction, we sought to discover inhibitors of WNK/SPAK binding by screening chemical compounds that disrupt the binding. For this purpose, we developed a high-throughput screening method using fluorescent correlation spectroscopy. As a result of screening 17000 compounds, we discovered two novel compounds that reproducibly disrupted the binding of WNK to SPAK. Both compounds mediated dose-dependent inhibition of hypotonicity-induced activation of WNK, namely the phosphorylation of SPAK and its downstream transporters NKCC1 (Na/K/Cl cotransporter 1) and NCC (NaCl cotransporter) in cultured cell lines. The two compounds could be the promising seeds of new types of antihypertensive drugs, and the method that we developed could be applied as a general screening method to identify compounds that disrupt the binding of two molecules.

N-Ethylmaleimide increases KCC2 cotransporter activity by modulating transporter phosphorylation

K⁺/Cl⁻ cotransporter 2 (KCC2) is selectively expressed in the adult nervous system and allows neurons to maintain low intracellular Cl⁻ levels. Thus, KCC2 activity is an essential prerequisite for fast hyperpolarizing synaptic inhibition mediated by type A γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA_A) receptors, which are Cl⁻-permeable, ligand-gated ion channels. Consistent with this, deficits in the activity of KCC2 lead to epilepsy and are also implicated in neurodevelopmental disorders, neuropathic pain, and schizophrenia. Accordingly, there is significant interest in developing activators of KCC2 as therapeutic agents. To provide insights into the cellular processes that determine KCC2 activity, we have investigated the mechanism by which N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) enhances transporter activity using a combination of biochemical and electrophysiological approaches. Our results revealed that, within 15 min, NEM increased cell surface levels of KCC2 and modulated the phosphorylation of key regulatory residues within the large cytoplasmic domain of KCC2 in neurons. More specifically, NEM increased the phosphorylation of serine 940 (Ser-940), whereas it decreased phosphorylation of threonine 1007 (Thr-1007). NEM also reduced with no lysine (WNK) kinase phosphorylation of Ste20-related proline/alanine-rich kinase (SPAK), a kinase that directly phosphorylates KCC2 at residue Thr-1007. Mutational analysis revealed that Thr-1007 dephosphorylation mediated the effects of NEM on KCC2 activity. Collectively, our results suggest that compounds that either increase the surface stability of KCC2 or reduce Thr-1007 phosphorylation may be of use as enhancers of KCC2 activity.

                                                                  

Tiagabine (trade name Gabitril) is n anticonvulsant medication produced by Cephalon that is used in the treatment of epilepsy. The drug is also used off-label in the treatment of anxiety disorders and panic disorder.

Tiagabine is approved by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an adjunctive treatment for partial seizures in individuals of age 12 and up. It may also be prescribed off-label by physicians to treat anxiety disorders and panic disorder as well as neuropathic pain (including fibromyalgia). For anxiety and neuropathic pain, tiagabine is used primarily to augment other treatments. Tiagabine may be used alongside selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, or benzodiazepines for anxiety, or antidepressants, gabapentin, other anticonvulsants, or opioids for neuropathic pain.^[4]

Tiagabine increases the level of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system, by blocking the GABA transporter 1 (GAT-1), and hence is classified as a GABA reuptake inhibitor (GRI).

Conclusion

Today’s post shows how you need to read well beyond the autism research, not to miss something useful.

Some of today’s suggested therapies for Huntington’s are likely to help some types of autism, but some will certainly have a negative effect in some people.  For example, increasing the amount of GABA in the CNS would do my son no good at all.

The emerging field of drugs that enhance KCC2 should be very beneficial to all those with autism who are bumetanide responders.

Enhancing CKB with creatine is interesting. Creatine is a muscle building supplement used by body builders and some DAN doctors. It does have interactions at high doses.

Making best use of existing NKCC1/2 Blockers in Autism

Azosemide C12H11ClN6O2S2  

Source: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/azosemide

Today’s post may be of interest to those already using bumetanide for autism and for those considering doing so.  It does go into the details, because they really do matter and does assume some prior knowledge from earlier posts.

There has been a very thorough new paper published by a group at Johns Hopkins:-

Off-Label Use of Bumetanide for Brain Disorders: An Overview

It does cover all the usual issues and raises some points that have not been covered yet in this blog.  One point is treating autism prenatally. This issue was studied twice in rats, and the recent study was sent to me by Dr Ben Ari.  Short term treatment during pregnancy produced a permanent benefit.

Maternal bumetanide treatment prevents the overgrowth in the VPA condition

            

Brief maternal administration of bumetanide before birth restores low neuronal intracellular chloride concentration ([Cl⁻]_i) levels, produces an excitatory-to-inhibitory shift in the action of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and attenuates the severity of electrical and behavioral features of ASD (9, 10), suggesting that [Cl⁻]_i levels during birth might play an important role in the pathogenesis of ASD (7). Here, the same bumetanide treatment significantly reduced the hippocampal and neocortical volumes of P0 VPA pups, abolishing the volume increase observed during birth in the VPA condition [hippocampus: P0 VPA versus P0 VPA + BUM (P = 0.0116); neocortex: P0 VPA versus P0 VPA + BUM (P = 0.0242); KWD] (Fig. 3B). Maternal bumetanide treatment also shifted the distribution of cerebral volumes from lognormal back to normal in the population of VPA brains, restoring smaller cerebral structure volumes (Fig. 3C). It also decreased the CA3 volume to CTL level after birth, suggesting that the increased growth observed in this region could be mediated by the excitatory actions of GABA (Fig. 3D). Therefore, maternal bumetanide administration prevents the enhanced growth observed in VPA animals during birth.

One issue with Bumetanide is that it affects both:-

·        NKCC2 in your kidneys, causing diuresis

·        NKCC1 in your brain and elsewhere, which is divided into two slightly different forms NKCC1a and NKCC1b

NKCC1 is also expressed in your inner ear where it is necessary for establishing the potassium-rich endolymph that bathes part of the cochlea, an organ necessary for hearing. 

If you block NKCC1 too much you will affect hearing.

Blocking NKCC1 in children and adults is seen as safe but the paper does query what the effect on hearing might be if given prenatally as the ear is developing.

Treating Down Syndrome Prenatally

While treating autism prenatally might seem a bit unlikely, treating Down Syndrome (DS) prenatally certainly is not.  Very often DS is accurately diagnosed before birth creating a valuable treatment window.  In most countries the vast majority of DS prenatal diagnoses lead to termination, but only a small percentage of pregnancies are tested for DS. In some countries such as Ireland a significant number of DS pregnancies are not terminated, these could be treated to reduce the deficits that will otherwise inevitably follow.

Timing of therapies for Down syndrome: the sooner, the better

The research does suggest that DS is another brain disorder that responds to bumetanide.

Back to autism and NKCC1

This should remind us that a defect in NKCC1 expression will not only cause elevated levels of chloride with in neurons, but will also affect the levels of sodium and potassium with neurons.

There are many ion channel dysfunctions (channelopathies) implicated in autism and elevated levels of sodium and potassium will affect numerous ion channels.  The paper does suggest that the benefit of bumetanide may go beyond modifying the effect of GABA, which is the beneficial mode of action put forward by Dr Ben Ari.

We have seen how hypokalemic sensory overload looks very similar to what often occurs in autism and that autistic sensory overload is reduced by taking an oral potassium supplement.

The paper also reminds us that loop diuretics like bumetanide and furosemide not only reduce inflow of chloride into neurons, but may also reduce the outflow. This is particularly known of furosemide, but also occurs with bumetanide at higher doses.

The chart below shows that the higher the concentration of bumetanide the strong its effect becomes on blocking NKCC1.

But at higher doses there will also be a counter effect of closing the NKCC2 transporter that allows chloride to leave neurons.

At some point a higher dose of bumetanide may have a detrimental effect on trying to lower chloride within neurons.

Since Dr Ben Ari’s objective is to lower chloride levels in neurons  it is important how freely these ions both enter and exit.  The net effect is what matters. (Loop diuretics block NKCC1 that lets chloride enter neurons but also block the KCC2 transporter via which they exit)

Is Bumetanide the optimal existing drug to lower chloride within neurons?  Everyone agrees that it is not, because only a tiny amount crosses into the brain. The paper gives details of the prodrugs like BUM5 that have been looked at previously in this blog; these are modified versions of bumetanide that can better slip across the blood brain barrier and then react in the brain to produce bumetanide itself.  It also highlights the recent research that suggests that Bumetanide may not be the most potent approved drug, it is quite conceivable that another old drug called Azosemide is superior.

The blood brain barrier is the problem, as is often the case.  Bumetanide has a low pH (it is acidic) which hinders its diffusion across the barrier.  Only about 1% passes through.

There is scepticism among researchers that enough bumetanide can cross into the brain to actually do any good.  This is reflected in the review paper.

The paper reminds us of the research showing how you can boost the level of bumetanide in the brain by adding Probenecid, an OAT3 inhibitor.  During World War 2 antibiotics were in short supply and so smaller doses were used, but their effect was boosted by adding Probenecid. By blocking OAT3, certain types of drug like penicillin and bumetanide are excreted at a slower rate and so the net level in blood increases.

The effect of adding Probenecid, or another less potent OAT3 inhibitors, is really no different to just increasing the dose of bumetanide.

The problem with increasing the dose of bumetanide is that via its effect on NKCC2 you cause even more diuresis, until eventually a plateau is reached.

Eventually, drugs selective for NKCC1a and/or NKCC1b will appear.

In the meantime, the prodrug BUM5 looks good. It crosses the BBB much better than bumetanide, but it still affects NKCC2 and so will cause diuresis.  But BUM5 should be better than Bumetanide + Probenecid, or a higher dose of Bumetanide.  BUM5 remains a custom-made research drug, never used in humans.

I must say that what again stands out to me is the old German drug, Azosemide.

In a study previously highlighted in this blog, we saw that Azosemide is 4 times more potent than Bumetanide at blocking NKCC1a and NKCC1b.

Azosemide is more potent than bumetanide and various other loop diuretics to inhibit the sodium-potassium-chloride-cotransporter human variants hNKCC1A and hNKCC1B

Azosemide is used in Japan, where recent research shows it is actually more effective than other diuretics

Azosemide, a Long-acting Loop Diuretic, is Superior to Furosemide in Prevention of Cardiovascular Death in Heart Failure Patients Without Beta-blockade 

As is often the case, Japanese medicine has taken a different course to Western medicine.

Years of safety information has already been accumulated on Azosemide.  It is not an untried research drug. It was brought to market in 1981 in Germany. It is available as Diart in Japan made by Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho and as a cheaper generic version by Choseido Pharmaceutical. In South Korea Azosemide is marketed as Uretin.

In any other sector other than medicine, somebody would have thought to check by now if Azosemide is better than Bumetanide.  It is not a matter of patents, Ben-Ari has patented all of the possible drugs, including Azosemide and of course Bumetanide.

So now we move on to Azosemide.

When researchers came to check the potency of the above drugs the results came as a surprise.  It turns out that the old German drug Azosemide is 4 times as potent as bumetanide.

The big question is how does it cross the blood brain barrier.

“The low brain concentrations of bumetanide obtained after systemic administration are thought to result from its high ionization (>99%) at physiological pH and its high plasma protein binding (>95%), which restrict brain entry by passive diffusion, as well as active efflux transport at the blood-brain barrier(BBB). The poor brain penetration of bumetanide is a likely explanation for its controversial efficacy in the treatment of brain diseases”

“… azosemide was more potent than any other diuretic, including bumetanide, to inhibit the two NKCC1 variants. The latter finding is particularly interesting because, in contrast to bumetanide, which is a relatively strong acid (pKa = 3.6), azosemide is not acidic (pKa = 7.38), which should favor its tissue distribution by passive diffusion. Lipophilicity (logP) of the two drugs is in the same range (2.38 for azosemide vs. 2.7 for bumetanide). Furthermore, azosemide has a longer duration of action than bumetanide, which results in superior clinical efficacy26 and may be an important advantage for treatment of brain diseases with abnormal cellular chloride homeostasis.”

Dosage equivalents of loop Diuretics

Bumetanide has very high oral bioavailablity, meaning almost all of what you swallow as a pill makes it into your bloodstream.

Furosemide and Azosemide have much lower bioavailability and so higher doses are needed to give the same effect.

Both Furosemide and Bumetanide are short acting, while Azosemide is long acting.

For a drug that needs to cross the blood brain barrier small differences might translate into profoundly different effects.

The limiting factor in all these drugs is their effect on NKCC2 that causes diuresis.

1mg of bumetanide is equivalent to 40mg of furosemide.

2mg of bumetanide is equivalent to 80mg of furosemide.

The standard dose for Azosemide in Japan, where people are smaller than in the West, is 30 mg or 60mg. 

Research suggests that the same concentration of Azosemide is 4x more potent than Bumetanide at blocking NKCC1 transporters, other factors that matter include:-

·        How much of the oral tablet ends up in the bloodstream.

·        How long does it stay in the blood stream

·        How much of the drug actually crosses the blood brain barrier

·        How does the drug bind to the NKCC1 transporters in neurons

·        How rapidly is the drug excreted from the brain

·        What effect is there on the KCC2 transporter that controls the exit of chloride ions from neurons.

All of this comes down to which is more effective in adults with autism 2mg of bumetanide or 60mg of Azosemide.

The side effects, which are mainly diuresis and loss of electrolytes will be similar, but Azosemide is a longer acting drug and so there will be differences. In fact Azosemide is claimed to be less troublesome than Bumetanide in lower potassium levels in your blood.

Conclusion  

The open question is whether generic Azosemide is “better” than generic Bumetanide for treating brain disorders in humans.

I did recently ask Dr Ben-Ari if he is aware of any data on this subject. There is none.

Many millions of dollars/euros are being spent getting Bumetanide approved for autism, so it would be a pity if Azosemide turns out to be better. (Dr Ben Ari’s company Neurochlore wants to develop a new molecule that will cross the blood brain barrier, block NKCC1 and not NKCC2 and so will not cause diuresis).

The hunch of the researchers from Hanover, Germany seems to be that the old German drug Azosemide will be better than Bumetanide.

I wonder if doctors at Johns Hopkins / Kennedy Krieger have started to prescribe bumetanide off-label to their patients with autism.  Their paper shows that they have a very comprehensive knowledge of the subject.

===========

I suggest readers consult the full version of the Johns Hopkins review paper on Bumetanide, it is peppered with links to all the relevant papers.

Off-Label Use of Bumetanide for Brain Disorders: An Overview

Bumetanide (BTN or BUM) is a FDA-approved potent loop diuretic (LD) that acts by antagonizing sodium-potassium-chloride (Na-K-Cl) cotransporters, NKCC1 (SLc12a2) and NKCC2. While NKCC1 is expressed both in the CNS and in systemic organs, NKCC2 is kidney-specific. The off-label use of BTN to modulate neuronal transmembrane Cl⁻gradients by blocking NKCC1 in the CNS has now been tested as an anti-seizure agent and as an intervention for neurological disorders in pre-clinical studies with varying results. BTN safety and efficacy for its off-label use has also been tested in several clinical trials for neonates, children, adolescents, and adults. It failed to meet efficacy criteria for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) neonatal seizures. In contrast, positive outcomes in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), autism, and schizophrenia trials have been attributed to BTN in studies evaluating its off-label use. NKCC1 is an electroneutral neuronal Cl⁻importer and the dominance of NKCC1 function has been proposed as the common pathology for HIE seizures, TLE, autism, and schizophrenia. Therefore, the use of BTN to antagonize neuronal NKCC1 with the goal to lower internal Cl⁻ levels and promote GABAergic mediated hyperpolarization has been proposed. In this review, we summarize the data and results for pre-clinical and clinical studies that have tested off-label BTN interventions and report variable outcomes. We also compare the data underlying the developmental expression profile of NKCC1 and KCC2, highlight the limitations of BTN’s brain-availability and consider its actions on non-neuronal cells.

Btn Pro-Drugs and Analogs

To improve BTN accessibility to the brain, pro-drugs with lipophilic and uncharged esters, alcohol and amide analogs have been created. These pro-drugs convert to BTN after gaining access into the brain. There was a significantly higher concentration of ester prodrug, BUM5 (N,N – dimethylaminoethyl ester), in mouse brains compared to the parent BTN (10 mg/kg, IV of BTN and equimolar dose of 13 mg/kg, IV of BUM5) (Töllner et al., 2014). BUM5 stopped seizures in adult animal models where BTN failed to work (Töllner et al., 2014; Erker et al., 2016). BUM5 was also less diuretic and showed better brain access when compared to the other prodrugs, BUM1 (ester prodrug), BUM7 (alcohol prodrug) and BUM10 (amide prodrug). BUM5 was reported to be more effective than BTN in altering seizure thresholds in epileptic animals post-SE and post-kindling (Töllner et al., 2014). Furthermore, BUM5 (13 mg/kg, IV) was more efficacious than BTN (10 mg/kg, IV) in promoting the anti-seizure effects of PB, in a maximal electroshock seizure model (Erker et al., 2016). Compared to BUM5 which was an efficacious adjunct to PB in the above mentioned study, BTN was not efficacious when administered as an adjunct (Erker et al., 2016). In addition to seizure thresholds, further studies need to be conducted to assess effects of BUM5 on seizure burdens, ictal events, duration and latencies.

Recently, a benzylamine derivative, bumepamine, has been investigated in pre-clinical models. Since benzylamine derivatives lack the carboxylic group of BTN, it results in lower diuretic activity (Nielsen and Feit, 1978). This prompted Brandt et al. (2018) to explore the proposed lower diuretic activity, higher lipophilicity and lower ionization rate of bumepamine at physiological pH. Since it is known that rodents metabolize BTN quicker than humans, the study used higher doses of 10 mg/kg of bumepamine similar to their previous BTN studies (Olsen, 1977; Brandt et al., 2010; Töllner et al., 2014). Bumepamine, while only being nominally metabolized to BTN, was more effective than BTN to support anticonvulsant effects of PB in rodent models of epilepsy. This GABAergic response, however, was not due to antagonistic actions on NKCC1; suggesting bumepamine may have an off-target effect, which remains unknown. However, the anticonvulsive effects of bumepamine, in spite of its lack of action on NKCC1, are to be noted. Additionally, in another study by the same group, it was shown that azosemide was 4-times more potent an inhibitor of NKCC1 than BTN, opening additional avenues for better BBB penetration and NKCC1-antagonizing compounds for potential neurological drug discovery (Hampel et al., 2018).

Conclusion

The beneficial effects of BTN reported in cases of autism, schizophrenia and TLE, given its poor-brain bioavailability are intriguing. The mechanisms underlying the effects of BTN, as a neuromodulator for developmental and neuropsychiatric disorders could be multifactorial due to prominent NKCC1 function at neuronal and non-neuronal sites within the CNS. Investigation of the possible off-target and systemic effects of BTN may help further this understanding with the advent of a new generation of brain-accessible BTN analogs.