There
are many blogs about severe autism on the internet. They tend to start when the child is very
young and the author is upbeat and optimistic about all the challenges ahead. ABA is wonderful, homeopathy is great, the
DAN doctor and the Zyto scan are so impressive and then they usually fade away as the reality sets
in of dealing with a child who is no longer a cute youngster anymore and their autism
did not go away, it became more evident.
If
you want to read about the reality of older children/adults with untreated severe autism
you can follow the blog of the US National Council for Severe Autism.
This group
does indeed share “autism horror stories”, but that is the reality they live
in. Those sometimes annoying autism self-advocates that get upset by these inconvenient stories about severe autism are demonstrating what is well known, that some Aspies do lack empathy and cannot be
reasoned with on subjects they have become fixated upon. Most Aspies, fortunately, do not have these
issues - best the former group find something else to fixate upon, like climate change.
I
think autism horror stories should act as a warning of what might lie ahead if
you are not proactive earlier on.
I do
recall “medical advice” given to me by doctor relatives when Monty was
diagnosed aged three. “It’s alright now
that he doesn’t talk, but what are you going to do when he is five years old, if
he still does not talk? People are going
to notice” and “make sure he does not get aggressive, as he gets older”.
How
do you ensure speech develops and aggressive behaviour does not develop? It is
not so easy.
Monty
is now 16 and adult-sized, by 9 years old he had experienced all the worse
autism can bring, except for epilepsy, but we are still here and still
optimistic. Autism did not fade away to nothing, but after nearly 7 years of
personalized medicine, IQ has been significantly increased and the severe
issues relating to autism have all been resolved.
As
one severe-autism Grandad said to me, “Monty is 80% fixed”.
The
remaining 20% does still make him more autistic than most people diagnosed
today with “autism”. But overdiagnosis
is another story.
I
think the members of the US National Council for Severe Autism really should
look at personalized medicine. Improvement is possible at any age. Just because
you tried a DAN Doctor a decade ago, does not mean you did everything, science
has moved on and there are some good researchers.
I am
really pleased that even at Monty’s age of 16 that further improvement to the
rate of skill acquisition is possible. It took just three weeks, seven years ago, to
find my first 3 effective interventions; further innovations took longer and
longer. Six years later another burst of activity seems to have paid off and I
think we are approaching “as good as it gets” in terms of mood, behaviour and
learning capacity.
The
current plan is three more years of high school and then to move on. That would mean leaving school just before Monty’s
19th birthday, while his classmates would be 16/17 and after they
all take their first set of official exams (General Certificate of Secondary
Education). The English educational system is unusual in that in the last two
years of high school most people study only 3 subjects, it is very narrow and
specialized and so unsuited to inclusion of anyone with Classic autism. In effect Monty skips the last two years of
high school, but since he was held back two years at the age of 9, he still
leaves school at 18.
Monty
does not have an IEP (Individualized Education
Program), he attends the regular classes and sits the regular exams, but he
does have a 1:1 assistant. Hopefully,
this will continue to work well for another three school years.
Monty has recently joined a social skills group for teenagers
with Asperger’s/Autism, which we are calling “Drama class”; it is his first
classroom experience with non-neurotypicals. They can practise social
interactions and concepts like personal space.
The others have more conversational speech than Monty.
We have found inclusion in a small mainstream school very
successful. Putting a group of people with special needs together has
advantages and disadvantages. Having a combination of both types of education
is probably best. In the research
studies, the interaction with typical peers is the most beneficial, but in many
real-life cases of inclusion there are typical peers, but there is almost no
interaction with them.
I think that sometimes inclusion is more for the parents’
benefit than the child. Where we live an
autistic child with MR/ID can attend an elite selective high school because
according to their IEP they have outstanding grades and so win entry. How does this help the child? They have no
chance of following anything their brainy classmates are learning.
The key aim of Monty’s therapy for
some time has been to develop more speech. Many young children now diagnosed
with autism have obsessive interests like dinosaurs, about which they may drone
on incessantly. We are coming from the “not speaking at all” end of the
spectrum. When people tell me that
others with autism speak more than Monty, I now ask what are they actually
talking about. Very often it is a repetitive ritual of questions and answers,
but it is indeed a form of conversation.
The net result of Monty’s therapy and
pills has been more speech in recent months. He is very interested in a
widening group of landmark buildings in the city centre and is interested to
know in terms of North, South, East and West where certain cities and countries
are. I suppose this is the kind of dinosaur conversation/monologue that parents
experience with their young Aspie child.
Monty is making some great comments
while we are driving, when anything unexpected happens, like today when an ambulance
had to squeeze past our car in traffic. Today was a new comment of his
creation.
Since Monty is 16 years old, I suppose
we are expecting more “speech” like that we had from Monty’s big brother, who
could speak like an adult when he was just a small boy. Big brother calls me up
from his University in Milan to discuss which Universities to apply to for his
semester abroad, or what kind of wine goes best with the risotto a friend is
cooking, or how to stop his air conditioner from smelling. Monty wants to know
where is Stockholm and does it have a shopping mall? Does the shopping mall
have a cinema? Who lives in Myanmar? (Aung San Suu Kyi), Who lives in Kazakhstan? (big brother’s
friend) Who lives in Russia (Mr Putin). He wants to know what is for supper and
can he go out for ice cream afterwards.
It is better to just regard more of
any kind of “relevant-to-him” speech as a good thing. When he sees a road being
reconstructed, he wants to talk about what equipment is used and how the
workers will tidy up after they have finished. For Monty being tidy is very
important, this why he likes washing cars every weekend. We have now moved on to washing decking.
If you count all this as “speech”,
then there is far more speech than twelve months ago.
At school he can describe where he
went for his summer holiday, but at home with family he would be briefer. This is probably perfectly normal behavior.
In addition to more speech, some
sentences are getting very long, meaning sometimes he has to take a second run
at getting to the end.
There is also much more use of the
first person, rather than you/Monty. He also improved in his second language.
Meanwhile, broader cognitive function
is also growing. I restarted an online Math tutoring program called Maths Whizz
that we used several years ago. Now we are at a much higher level and Monty
needs far less help than I used to give. I have not repeated any of the
lessons, whereas I used to repeat all of them several times.
I am not expecting Monty to ever get
to the level of a “true Aspie”, Hans Asperger’s little professors who are
brilliant at maths and fluently speak multiple languages, like Greta Thunberg. The
“contemporary Aspie” may well be what he ends up resembling in a few more years
- I am surprised how over-used that term became, maybe that is why they got rid
of it in DSM5.
To be an Aspie the definition slipped to
mean you never had MR/ID and did not have a speech delay.
I think Azosemide (the second daily
NKCC1 blocker), Clemastine (myelin booster and pacifier of microglia), BHB/C8 and the recently added DMF (immunomodulator and Nrf-2 activator) are driving the changes
along with his long term 1:1 assistant.
The
summertime raging and regression of previous years is countered by Verapamil, Dymista nasal spray (fluticasone propionate with azelastine
hydrochloride), Azosemide and now a tiny amount of DMF.
Our ENT doctor is another big fan of Dymista and told me to feel free to give it twice a day for 2+ months. More Dymista =
less anxiety.
Our dental marathon is nearly over. We
have been to our new dentist 15 times this year to avoid general anesthetic
and two extractions and she has witnessed how allergy greatly affects behavior and
compliance. Monty has had local anesthetic 10 times, which is far more than I had expected.
DMF was my final secret weapon to ensure summertime tranquillity at the dentist.
Now at the dentist Monty gets into the chair and then requests what music he wants the dental assistant to put on. Monty and his dentist seem to like Abba and Cyndi Lauper at the moment. When one track ends, he requests the next one, “Miss, can we have ….”.
Now at the dentist Monty gets into the chair and then requests what music he wants the dental assistant to put on. Monty and his dentist seem to like Abba and Cyndi Lauper at the moment. When one track ends, he requests the next one, “Miss, can we have ….”.
It does look
like very low dose DMF is another piece in the puzzle, at least in our case. It
does tick the important boxes in terms of safety and price, plus there is a
great deal of scientific evidence showing why it might be helpful.